While we're on the subject of wikis, here's what I've got so far for some wikilogos. I'll probably do a handful more tonight/tomorrow, but I want to have these up for suggestions while I'm doing others to keep them in mind.
I'm aware that they're larger, but it's easier to work that way. They look fine at the appropriate size. :) Keep in mind this is "untouchedup," but I'm not going to spend time on that if people totally don't like a logo or something.
Edit: please view at full size. Looks terrible compressed like that.
TestLogo.png
Description
Filesize
186.81KB
Viewed
111 Time(s)
Testlogo2.png
Description
Filesize
84.59KB
Viewed
431 Time(s)
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:18 pm
Mason
James Stone wrote:
Just to let you know I have been trying to sort things out in my head and created a wiki to assist.
Did some coding Attached is a file containing a text representation of the black and white pixels in the original black/white noise-or-barcode picture. Each 0 or 1 represents a single "block" in the original picture (i.e. 2 or 3 pixels wide/high), with 0 = black and 1 = white.
Interesting things to note:
1. The pixel array is 256 pixels wide by 256 pixels high.
2. There seem to be 2 areas, each rotated 180 degrees and placed beneath itself. There's the "main" area, on the right, which we found before, and there's a 4-pixel-wide strip on the left hand side which is rotated and placed "below". In essence then, once the rotations have been removed, I think there are 2 things here: a 4x128 strip in the top-left of the image, and a 251x128 "body" in the top-right.
It's also worth noting that we can't tell where the "break" in rotation is - it's possible that the top half has been rotated to get the bottom half, but also possible that the left half of each area has been rotated to get the right.
3. It doesn't seem to convert into ASCII, at least, not using it in the format it is now. I looked at it on it's side (i.e. so the left hand edge becomes the top) but can't see any obvious signs of ASCII (no repeated 0110xxxx patterns).
4. Perhaps with all the talk of PGP here, we're looking at a key and a code, or a public key and a session key? The left-hand strip is a total size of 512 bits, which could be a public key. I'm not sure how session keys work in PGP, or what size they're likely to be though.
Busy this evening, so I'm sure plenty will happen I'll look into this more when I get a chance, or if it looks extremely relevant, hum...
pixel_bitmap.txt
Description
pixels from white noise turned into ascii 1s and 0s
The whois for gatethreeincident.com also shows it was registered just the other day, on 26th June. Seems weird - he first mentioned gate 3 on the 23rd. Maybe registration takes a few days to go through? Or maybe he just wanted us to find the gate 3 article?
[Edit - forgot I was going to post other stuff ]
Quote:
Eric: I guess the file will help out once I get it - very curious. One of the AA's got away - so I think they are making the file public to those who have the key - very confusing
This, plus Stuart's talk, plus Eric posting my PGP key at me all makes me think the file will be PGP encrypted.
On the "who is Stuart Munro?" question: Eric's LinkedIn profile page (now gone - see previous post) was private, but if you logged into LinkedIn you could see it. I think that mentioned that he worked for xperience communications (http://www.xperiencecommunications.com/) - so mason dropped them a mail and got a reply back from Stuart, I believe.
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 5:23 am
enaxor
Eric just contacted me using Google Talk. Sorry, but I've been so busy I'm not quite sure what's up.
Quote:
Eric: Hello Eric H: 6op 1 Libra Roxanne: Hey Eric: West coast? Roxanne: Yes, Oregon Eric: Near Eugene? Roxanne: Portland Eric: Better than Detroit - been there a few times Roxanne: heh, from what I've heard, anywhere is better than Detroit Eric: Not really -- there is still FLint Michigan and Haiti Roxanne: never been to either
Do you have friends in Eugene?
Eric: Yes
I know people a lot of places
Roxanne: that's cool
so I guess a few of my friends found that website
Eric: YeahI think they are involved for a reason - not sure where you came in Roxanne: I'm totally confused by the whole thing
but that's my usual state
Eric: Yeah - me too
Not happy about it - you guys are a lot better at this stuff - I have no idea what is going on. Not happy about it
Roxanne: I'm not good at anything, my friends are Eric: A lot of personal info out there on me - makes it tough living my life Roxanne: ah Eric: but that's what they want
Stupid parking garages when you are drunk
Roxanne: by they do you mean your employer? Eric: Oh no.
It's a tough balance
Roxanne: I guess I'll need to have my friends fill me in on everything
so I can try to understand what this is all about
is there anything I can pass on to my friends that they will understand?
Eric: I guess the file will help out once I get it - very curious. One of the AA's got away - so I think they are making the file public to those who have the key - very confusing Roxanne: so you don't have the file yet?
I mean it does say "waiting for file"
Eric: No. Roxanne: will you be getting it? Eric: Maybe 1:18 my time tomorrow.... seems like Roxanne: ah okay
is that EDT?
or UTC?
Eric: EDST Roxanne: k, I will tell my friends to look for it Eric: They are out of a few places... Arlington and such
Have a nice night - I know I won't while they have their thumb to me.
Roxanne: oh so a compilation of files? Eric: No - just one Roxanne: k
sorry for your trouble
Eric: Yeah - I didn't want it - I hope they just go away.
Or find someone else
Roxanne: maybe we can help with that? Eric: That is why you are here. Roxanne: yeah I figured Eric: But thanks anyway Roxanne: I'll pass this along to my friends
I'm around most of the time, so just say hi if you want Eric: I will - I can use friends in this Roxanne: Eric: Sorry you are involved - this really goes to high levels - really creepy Roxanne: that's okay
Sent at 8:05 PM on Wednesday
Color Legend: Eric, bold darkblue Roxanne, red
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:17 pm
DelVillan.
That was another anagram for Threatening Deceit, but I dismissed it because...well, it's kinda nonsense.
Wish I would've posted it, too.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:15 pm
Mason
I don't think that 'never' was there when I looked. Hmm.
Also, Stuart replied with the tie question:
Quote:
Enchanted Tiger Tie
Google shows 'Enchanted Tiger' as VAN DEMARK, HARRY (Van Dusen) story #30 in Wild Game Stories [v 1 #6, December 1936].
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:11 pm
DelVillan.
Mason wrote:
Now we're talking!
Tags:
meta name="author" content="c2c2"
meta name="publication" content=""
meta name="postdate" content="1.18.07"
meta name="description" content=""
META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="ailis"
You missed META name="never," which seems to be important to note because it's spelled normally this time, as opposed to "nevar."
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 7:09 pm
Scribe
Bah, I watched Highlander while you guys were having fun? What a waste of an evening... Catch up tomorrow.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:33 pm
DelVillan.
Awesome.
Sorry about the delays I'm having. I found that stuff a while ago, but my internet's been on and off all day. Doing my best :)
Title: Mahasamparka
(Means: 'the great contact', also a title of 2 novels by P.N.Rangan ['Manu']).
Tags:
meta name="author" content="c2c2"
meta name="publication" content=""
meta name="postdate" content="1.18.07"
meta name="description" content=""
META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="ailis"
Whois shows:
Tucows Inc.
Registrant: Hachlinski, Eric.
Nameservers: NS1.R4L.COM
This may or may not be important, but after looking for anagrams of Threatening+deceit, there is "Gate Three incident," or "Gate 3 Incident." If you do a search for the latter, it happens to turn up something that allegedly happened in Area 51. I find it to be a red flag that anything anagrams to "Gate Three" at all, really.
Can anyone check that out? My internet is iffy due to storms, so I'll be looking for any more possible clues in the two words instead.
EDIT: Heh, I guess it was important.
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:50 pm
tipsila
Mason wrote:
Quote:
me: Eric
I've been speaking to Stuart from xperience... he's very philosophical
Sent at 9:13 PM on Wednesday
Eric: I met him once - you'd get more out of a March
Hare
it's all jabberwocky
Well, if we are going to go all Lewis Carroll, then here is the poem, Jabberwocky, found as a part of his novel Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (1871).
Quote:
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!"
He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought—
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.
And, as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!
One, two! One, two! And through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.
"And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
He chortled in his joy.
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.