So it was Lynch. Somehow I've missed seeing that one. I'll have to put it in the NF queue. I'll let somebody else drive. as I'll be in and out over the weekend.
wait. So what was the answer? That last frame looks like some stop-motion animated short -- which would not qualify as a title shown in theaters, would it?
Rogi is correct. He reincorporated the short (which was not stop-motion animated, those are actual people, one of which is Naomi Watts, wearing rabbit heads), into a larger feature that was shown in theaters.
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 1:53 am
Rogi Ocnorb
You're correct, catherwood. But he re-used parts of the shorts in a larger, 4 years later project.
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:29 pm
catherwood
Rogi Ocnorb wrote:
So it was Lynch. Somehow I've missed seeing that one. I'll have to put it in the NF queue. I'll let somebody else drive. as I'll be in and out over the weekend.
wait. So what was the answer? That last frame looks like some stop-motion animated short -- which would not qualify as a title shown in theaters, would it?
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:25 pm
Rogi Ocnorb
So it was Lynch. Somehow I've missed seeing that one. I'll have to put it in the NF queue. I'll let somebody else drive. as I'll be in and out over the weekend.
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 6:08 pm
urthstripe
Putting an end to your misery, even though you guys were so close...
vlcsnap-2011-03-18-17h04m05s220.png
Description
Filesize
432.55KB
Viewed
38 Time(s)
Posted: Fri Mar 18, 2011 4:16 pm
urthstripe
And we continue...
vlcsnap-2011-03-14-23h49m23s90.png
Description
Filesize
213.31KB
Viewed
41 Time(s)
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:00 pm
Puppy_Zwolle
urthstripe wrote:
Puppy, PARIS, TEXAS was used way back on page 15..... by you. So...no.
They say the one actually loosing his mind is the last to find out.... Another 'Oops' for my memoirs... if I can remember where I left them.
The Straight Story?
*edit*
And that 'oops' also goes for this early guess.
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 7:29 am
urthstripe
Puppy, PARIS, TEXAS was used way back on page 15..... by you. So...no.
red, orange and green hi-lo shag "renter's carpet" was outlawed. Brown wasn't outlawed until the '90s.
That would fit perfectly with a 'budget conscious' movie. They probably got payed for removing it from the location after filming.
And to keep in theme and on subject:
Blue Velvet?
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:41 am
Rogi Ocnorb
Because you skipped the '80s, you are probably unaware that red, orange and green hi-lo shag "renter's carpet" was outlawed. Brown wasn't outlawed until the '90s.
Doesn't ring any bells, but, how about something like Inception?
