unforum :: Topic review

urthstripe · Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 10:58 pm

That's because Rogi is an EXPERT Googler. Us regular people just flail futilely at the internet. Like my uncle... I swear he was a Luddite in a past life.

catherwood · Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:05 am

Rogi Ocnorb wrote:

I'm pretty sure I know. But I know how you hate it when I guess movies I haven't seen.

Who what now? Many of my guesses -- even my submissions! -- are movies I haven't seen. I rather enjoy the detective work of tracking down a movie based on some obscure item in a scene (but not so obscure that there is nothing to put into a search engine and nothing to find a confirming shot of online), almost as much as being able to recognize a single shot from memory.

So, feel free to guess when you want to win the round. Feel free to *say* you think you know it but are declining. And I'll gladly say I have NO idea what this current one is nor how to go about tracking it down.

As for McSpamster, we still would like a mod to remove the external link, even if the post must remain as an example to all who dare cross us.

Rogi Ocnorb · Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:09 am

Because that's not how the game is played there, Spammy McSpamster.
If you'd have guessed Urthstripe's flick, then you'd have won the right to post Citizen Kane. Well... You would have if it hadn't been used, before.
Normally, I'd just post your reply in the Spam cleanup thread and the mods would delete your post. But, in this case your Attempt at providing relevant content means they'll just remove the spammy link.

Fast-Debrid · Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:45 pm

I thought...

urthstripe · Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:19 am

Speaking of the award, I agree that 2004 was a major headscratcher, but every pick since then has been to movies that are, if not excellent, absolutely deserving. This year included.

Rogi Ocnorb · Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:59 pm

I'm pretty sure I know. But I know how you hate it when I guess movies I haven't seen.
I think it's the award that lost all credibility, for me, in 2004, the rest of the world in 2011 and can't make up it's mind how it should be named; So, it keeps flip-flopping.

urthstripe · Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:15 pm

It won a major award!

urthstripe · Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:30 pm

1. It is Thai.
2. It is not horror.

Rogi Ocnorb · Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:16 pm

I'm thinking it's gotta be Thai, given the Dharma pic on the wall and the cheesy glowing red eyes.

Maybe the older version of "Shutter"?

urthstripe · Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:22 pm

Nope.

JumboTron · Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:50 am

urthstripe, is it "Pulse"?

EGo · Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:25 pm

catherwood wrote:

EGo wrote:

urthstripe wrote:

Twilight?

Ha. Yes.

hrm, I thought it was specifically "Eclipse" from the Twilight Saga series, based solely my search for that Quileute word in the book shown. Now that there are three Twilight movies, perhaps the spreadsheet should record it as "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" (if indeed that was the correct one) for future disambiguation.

Carry on!

It would be The Twilight Saga: Twilight, then. It is indeed the first movie.

catherwood · Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 1:07 pm

EGo wrote:

urthstripe wrote:

Twilight?

Ha. Yes.

hrm, I thought it was specifically "Eclipse" from the Twilight Saga series, based solely my search for that Quileute word in the book shown. Now that there are three Twilight movies, perhaps the spreadsheet should record it as "The Twilight Saga: Eclipse" (if indeed that was the correct one) for future disambiguation.

Carry on!

urthstripe · Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:51 am

I continue the streak of guessing shameful movies.

EGo · Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:33 am

urthstripe wrote:

Twilight?

Ha. Yes.