unforum :: Topic review

tpbiv · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:23 am

Good luck!

feathernotdot · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:22 am

Quote:

Re: @feathernotdot
tpbiv wrote:
Did you see my post just a couple before yours? All those differences i listed....

Yes sorry, i was mainly responding to the fact that the data was interactive on the website, and that none of the other graphs/charts are like that other than the resources that you can click and have highlight to the side - I did see your hard work on the calculations, and i thank you for doing all the number crunching there.

It's now past midnight here, and i think my brain is sufficiently fried. Time for bed, and to have really weird dreams about stars, a dude chasing after 7 women, and charts. OH JOY!

There was no number crunching. If you click on the names David 7 or David 6 or whatever on the website. It shows the numbers on the website for you. I just copied them down.

Nerdygamerchick · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 am

Re: @feathernotdot

feathernotdot · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:17 am

@tpbiv

tpbiv · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:15 am

@feathernotdot

feathernotdot · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:13 am

I just thought I'd go through one more click through and bam, I noticed it.

Nerdygamerchick · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:08 am

feathernotdot wrote:

Did anyone realize that you can look at the different proficiencies of the different model of David's? Because I just noticed it. I may have missed it when the thread was going by earlier this evening.

I did notice this, then i went through each bit of data to see if it was clickable or not - the only thing i found being when you click a resource it highlights it to the right on the bar graph.

I didnt look too closely at the difference in the numbers in each model, as the timeline states that each model it increased in proficiency, and that it looked promising - but perhaps there is something to those numbers as well?

Too much math in all of this as far as I'm concerned :3 hehe

feathernotdot · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:03 am

Did anyone realize that you can look at the different proficiencies of the different model of David's? Because I just noticed it. I may have missed it when the thread was going by earlier this evening.

-edit-
On the websiite

David 7 - Technological 97, Intellectual 96, Physical 95, Emotional 96
David 6 - Technological 95, Intellectual 94, Physical 93, Emotional 92
David 5 - Technological 88, Intellectual 92, Physical 91, Emotional 89
David 4 - Technological 82, Intellectual 87, Physical 84, Emotional 80
David 3 - Technological 80, Intellectual 79, Physical 84, Emotional 65
David 2 - Technological 75, Intellectual 77, Physical 80, Emotional 59
David 1 - Technological 75, Intellectual 70, Physical 75, Emotional 40

On jpeg download

David 7 - Technological 93, Intellectual 94, Physical 89, Emotional 44

megara · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:54 am

SevenSonicStructures wrote:

We should keep in mind those resources with their proper chemical symbol, those who don't, and the fictional ones, that way we can sort them out in order of significance.

I think this is a good idea. Maybe the fact that they had to add fictional resources points to these ones being used to spell something and they had to add these fictional ones so that they would have the appropriate letter combinations available?

tpbiv · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:43 am

Additional thoughts...

tpbiv · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:21 am

Discrepancies List...

SevenSonicStructures · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:12 am

I'm going to fill the numerical values of the total current reserves, for each resource, based on the exact size of the bar.

Edit: Done. Now I'd like to make some Excel trickery and turn these into actual percentages based on the 0-5000 legend.

Edit 2: Done as well. I didn't go for formulas though, Google Docs doesn't work the way I expected.

elegantworm · Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:55 pm

Rebus wrote:

If anyone would find it useful, I've transferred the data over to a spreadsheet at http://bit.ly/weyland which can be accessed and edited by anyone. All I've done so far is highlight that ones that someone mentioned before had been added by Weyland. It just might make it easier for everyone to use rather than having to back track through pages. I'll put it in my signature so it's always on a page.

Outstanding, this will make things much easier!

Nerdygamerchick · Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:44 pm

Rebus wrote:

If anyone would find it useful, I've transferred the data over to a spreadsheet at http://bit.ly/weyland which can be accessed and edited by anyone. All I've done so far is highlight that ones that someone mentioned before had been added by Weyland. It just might make it easier for everyone to use rather than having to back track through pages. I'll put it in my signature so it's always on a page.

Excellent - thank you!

Rebus · Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:41 pm

If anyone would find it useful, I've transferred the data over to a spreadsheet at http://bit.ly/weyland which can be accessed and edited by anyone. All I've done so far is highlight that ones that someone mentioned before had been added by Weyland. It just might make it easier for everyone to use rather than having to back track through pages. I'll put it in my signature so it's always on a page.

EDIT: Whatever edits you make, make sure you tell us about them in here.