Page 93 of 168 [2517 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, ..., 166, 167, 168  Next
Author Message
Rebus
Wow, that spreadsheet's looking really good Yoko, good work!

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:07 pm
offworld
Did Some Work on the Wiki
Yoko99 wrote:
dntmndm wrote:
Yoko99/Rebus: Is there a possibility to create a moderated subpage for the list of already tried URLs? So only chosen users could edit it and add new combinations, after checking them first? Of course, if there are any volunteers to be spammed with all those URLS Smile.


At the moment, anyone can create and edit pages. I think we'll have to count on everyone being responsible and careful.


I've been lurking for a few days, following clues, entering dozens of codes on my own and decided to join the forum. I had a bit of information that I was keeping in a Word document, so I "synopsized" it and added the info and links to the "Project Prometheus" page on the recently established wiki. Hope it's helpful for backtracking. I could probably add more, but it will have to wait for a couple of days.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:52 pm
Yoko99
Re: "Rich hisotry"
SevenSonicStructures wrote:
Yoko99 wrote:
I'm tinkering a bit with that spreadsheet we have before I link it better to the wiki, I hope you guys don't mind, just a question.. what's that (0-393) range, where does that come from? I can see how it's relative to the 0-5000 range, but not sure why it's there?


I filled that section (at least the number part), it means the actual size in pixels of that section (393), just so we can get an idea of the exact proportions we're dealing with. The 0-5000 means the actual proportion in the graph.


Thanks for clarifying, SSS.

http://bigthingshavesmallbeginnings.wikispaces.com/Weyland+Earth+Resources


What do you guys think, huh? Not too shabby! This can and will be refined even further, of course. I'm thinking now we should color-code real vs fictional, numbers that are text-formatted, that are duplicate, that don't fit the periodic table (for actual elements), and so on.
But then I was thinking, we can go into a bit more detail if we want to with a small section on the wiki page, that explains maybe why something seemed off to us. That's its purpose.

Also I really think we should go mathematic and check the numbers on the Weyland finances, I bet this thing is full of holes. The thing about how David's are distributed in each sector which is almost creepy.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:47 pm
SevenSonicStructures
Re: "Rich hisotry"
Yoko99 wrote:
I'm tinkering a bit with that spreadsheet we have before I link it better to the wiki, I hope you guys don't mind, just a question.. what's that (0-393) range, where does that come from? I can see how it's relative to the 0-5000 range, but not sure why it's there?


I filled that section (at least the number part), it means the actual size in pixels of that section (393), just so we can get an idea of the exact proportions we're dealing with. The 0-5000 means the actual proportion in the graph.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:36 pm
THEREALOWINN
INITIAL ROUND OF INVESTMENT CAPITAL (flag)
Following Weyland's success with solar panels, Weyland Industries receives funding from a trio of major venture capital firms.
JUNE 30, 2015

6 30 15
C Zn P ???

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:09 pm
chasrover
Ax Pc Rh Ti

also "Chart Pix"

There must be some reason for the jpegs. I've been trying to overlay them, see if anything matches up. So far can't see anything.

Do we know what stars are behind the headers?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:56 pm
katiebluebird
Yoko99 wrote:
Rebus wrote:
Hope I'm not stepping on any toes but I set up a Project Prometheus wiki that people can contribute, just in case they're more familiar with wikia formatting etc. If there's another one floating around that is live and people are working on then I'm more than happy to focus on that, just thought there should be a presence on wikia.


Gah.. Yeah, I should have gone for something like that obviously..


http://bigthingshavesmallbeginnings.wikispaces.com

I had this going on, but it's tough to make it heads and tails. I really just begun thinking of it as a sort of bible we could all share, kind of like what was done with the online spreadsheet posted earlier. Was fond of that one.


Which one do we want to stick with? I can help out with either. Having two might get hectic?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:54 pm
ChrisPachi
Re: "Rich hisotry"
Yoko99 wrote:
ChrisPachi wrote:
Like I say it could be coincidental, but these duplicate numbers are deliberate IMO.

THANK YOU, I've been saying that forever.


I personally wasn't sure with all of the corrections being made to the page, but now that a decent amount of time has passed - and other errors were fixed in the table but not these ones - I am also convinced. Stands out like a sore thumb.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:43 pm
blackfeathers
i just created a page to track investor information discrepancies by module section:
http://bigthingshavesmallbeginnings.wikispaces.com/Investor+Information+changes

there's also a wiki version of the investor page for reference. it should be helpful for text-based search and analysis of content, and far better to load without that background video and other multimedia freezing up browsers.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:42 pm
dntmndm
Re: "Rich hisotry"
ChrisPachi wrote:
Vitruvius wrote:
Tanmansmom wrote:
When I saw "rich history", the first thing I thought of was the timeline post about Dr. Richard Post being the 1M employee; anything there?



There is also the post dated december 21, 2037 mentioning Weyland's discovery of the rich mineral resources in the "outer veil."

I have already tried things like

projectpromethius.com/veil /outerveil /21122037 /12212037

I'm still convinced the number/letter convention used on the resource chart has great importance. If the tweet suggests looking at the timeline (history) for something rich (resources), it's on that particular date that these concepts (rich, history, resource) seem to intersect.

Just a thought...


I agree about the resource table. It may be coincidental, but if you take the 2 duplicated number pairs GRAPHITE / ADMANTIUM and RHODIUM / TITANIUM you get 'Ax Pc Rh Ti'. The word 'RICH' can be derived from that sequence by dropping the PT and AX, or even 'RICH PT' (Richard Post?) by dropping the only fanciful element/resource ADMANTIUM.

Like I say it could be coincidental, but these duplicate numbers are deliberate IMO.


..or even 'RICHA PT'

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:38 pm
Yoko99
Re: "Rich hisotry"
ChrisPachi wrote:
Like I say it could be coincidental, but these duplicate numbers are deliberate IMO.

THANK YOU, I've been saying that forever.

I'm tinkering a bit with that spreadsheet we have before I link it better to the wiki, I hope you guys don't mind, just a question.. what's that (0-393) range, where does that come from? I can see how it's relative to the 0-5000 range, but not sure why it's there?

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:37 pm
ChrisPachi
Re: "Rich hisotry"
Vitruvius wrote:
Tanmansmom wrote:
When I saw "rich history", the first thing I thought of was the timeline post about Dr. Richard Post being the 1M employee; anything there?



There is also the post dated december 21, 2037 mentioning Weyland's discovery of the rich mineral resources in the "outer veil."

I have already tried things like

projectpromethius.com/veil /outerveil /21122037 /12212037

I'm still convinced the number/letter convention used on the resource chart has great importance. If the tweet suggests looking at the timeline (history) for something rich (resources), it's on that particular date that these concepts (rich, history, resource) seem to intersect.

Just a thought...


I agree about the resource table. It may be coincidental, but if you take the 2 duplicated number pairs GRAPHITE / ADMANTIUM and RHODIUM / TITANIUM you get 'Ax Pc Rh Ti'. The word 'RICH' can be derived from that sequence by dropping the PT and AX, or even 'RICH PT' (Richard Post?) by dropping the only fanciful element/resource ADMANTIUM.

Like I say it could be coincidental, but these duplicate numbers are deliberate IMO.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:30 pm
Yoko99
dntmndm wrote:
Yoko99/Rebus: Is there a possibility to create a moderated subpage for the list of already tried URLs? So only chosen users could edit it and add new combinations, after checking them first? Of course, if there are any volunteers to be spammed with all those URLS Smile.


At the moment, anyone can create and edit pages. I think we'll have to count on everyone being responsible and careful.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:25 pm
dntmndm
Yoko99/Rebus: Is there a possibility to create a moderated subpage for the list of already tried URLs? So only chosen users could edit it and add new combinations, after checking them first? Of course, if there are any volunteers to be spammed with all those URLS Smile.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:58 pm
Rocket Rob
Dr. Richard F. Post
Wikipedia says.....Dr. Richard F. Post is an American physicist who has done work in nuclear fusion, magnetic levitation and magnetic bearing design and plasma physics, and winner of the James Clerk Maxwell Prize in Plasma Physics[1] and who holds patents in the fields of nuclear fusion, particle accelerators, and electronic and mechanical energy storage.

His notable work includes inductrack and magnetically levitated flywheels.

More at:

https://www.llnl.gov/str/Post.html

PostPosted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:52 pm
Page 93 of 168 [2517 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, ..., 166, 167, 168  Next
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group