Page 32 of 168 [2517 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, ..., 166, 167, 168  Next
Author Message
TST
iandaking wrote:


Once again, the wrong location is given for the artifacts. This is the only one i've seen so far though that's not in China or Vietnam...where is this?

EDIT: It looks like somewhere in Russia except that the distance between North America and Russia has been shrunk.


Potentially. I thought it looks vaguely like it could be in Egypt. Even then that's pushing it. Unless, and I suppose this is more unlikely is that the CW and weird globe are related, but I seriously doubt that.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:40 am
RHT1
Viral vs ARG?
So... does anyone think we're missing something in all these complex Weyland pages to get the ball rolling again, or just waiting for the next cog to move in a viral machine..?

The whole thing seems to be in a weird flux, to me. No?

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:21 am
SevenSonicStructures
Jane Smith wrote:
welll.... again more behind the *hack* *cough* *hack*



These are just sitting in the swf cache, so they are real images.


Now THIS is sloppy... Then again, I doubt you could really have much security control using Facebook apps and flash, on top of that.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:40 pm
iandaking
Padraigh wrote:
It's definitely a Typo IMO. I can't view the original source at work, but 2fray2 had a screen-grab of it as "CE".


2fray2 wrote:
I think that the Egyption artefact does not exist as a knowned papyri...

For this another one, i think that they mixed petroglyphs:





WTF is up with the representation of its location on the globe. Doesn't look like earth. Did I miss something?

I find it very odd that with so much thought and design poured into the website that we are finding so many sloppy "typos".


Once again, the wrong location is given for the artifacts. This is the only one i've seen so far though that's not in China or Vietnam...where is this?

EDIT: It looks like somewhere in Russia except that the distance between North America and Russia has been shrunk.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:28 pm
Datvi
Almost any element from fb app is here...
https://facebook.foxfilm.com/prometheus/starmap/uk/ext/xml/data.xml

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 1:14 pm
Dravenz
Dammit!

The most obvious place possible.

*kicks self for not looking properly*

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:59 am
Jane Smith
welll.... again more behind the *hack* *cough* *hack*



These are just sitting in the swf cache, so they are real images.




Spoiler (Rollover to View):
ext/images/gif/prom_artifact_week2_100.gif change this to week 3 week 4 etc..



not to spoil too much Wink

Spoiler (Rollover to View):
http://facebook.foxfilm.com/prometheus/starmap/uk/ext/swf/gif8.swf

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:51 am
Dravenz
Quote:
I find it very odd that with so much thought and design poured into the website that we are finding so many sloppy "typos".


I have to agree, surely some kind of peer-review should be carried out before go-live (Sorry PMs if your still lurking).

However, there is still no response from the guy who initially posted all 7. Do we even know if they are genuine?

The PMs have been doing a good job of keeping us from what we haven't to see yet (apart from a couple of P45-worthy slip ups).

These additional artefact gifs could be fake/not official, explaining typos etc.

If they are real then I'll be damned if I can work out where they came from unless there is a site we haven't found yet (which I doubt) - though I am at work and so can't investigate as much as I would like to.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:13 am
Padraigh
It's definitely a Typo IMO. I can't view the original source at work, but 2fray2 had a screen-grab of it as "CE".


2fray2 wrote:
I think that the Egyption artefact does not exist as a knowned papyri...

For this another one, i think that they mixed petroglyphs:





WTF is up with the representation of its location on the globe. Doesn't look like earth. Did I miss something?

I find it very odd that with so much thought and design poured into the website that we are finding so many sloppy "typos".

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:58 am
Dravenz
Re: ?!?!?
Mr_White wrote:
I'm afraid that might be a typo, seeing as W and E are right next to each other.


Yeah, I have the feeling you are right about this.

Assuming it is a typo, and dealing with it as such, that would still raise questions.

All bar 1 were from BC/BCE times and only 1 was from AD/CE times.

Whether or not it is a typo (which I am now assuming it is) it is still the odd one out. Coincidence?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:43 am
2fray2
Re: ?!?!?
Dravenz wrote:


680 CW

What does CW stand for?

Do you think it is significant that the BCE/CW is different?


Strange stuff...

convention wisdom ?
ClockWise ?

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:06 am
Dravenz
lembi2001 wrote:
probably just left over code from the reveal page but you never know.


Just looked at the source and it does look like leftovers I'm afraid Sad

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:33 am
lembi2001
anyone else noticed the hidden inout field again on the david page:

Quote:
<aside>

<h1></h1>
<p></p>

<access>
<form>
<h2>Access restricted</h2>
<input>
<label>Enter access code</label>
<div>
<input><input>
</div>

<span></span>

</form>

<ul></ul>
</aside>

probably just left over code from the reveal page but you never know


AGGGHHH - why can't i paste the <input> stuff in??

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:23 am
Mr_White
Re: ?!?!?
Dravenz wrote:

This may be a stupid question BUT I'll ask none the less.

All but 1 of the artefacts has a time-stamp followed by BCE:

Eg, 1540 BCE

This stands for "Before Common Era", or so I believe.

However one of them (attached again for reference) has a different convention:

680 CW

What does CW stand for?

Do you think it is significant that the BCE/CW is different?


I'm afraid that might be a typo, seeing as W and E are right next to each other. This would be very sloppy though, so let's hope it has some significance.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:10 am
Dravenz
?!?!?
I wonder where they got them from...

Someone has asked on the Russian forum. I'll be keeping an eye on the thread to see if he responds.

EDIT:

This may be a stupid question BUT I'll ask none the less.

All but 1 of the artefacts has a time-stamp followed by BCE:

Eg, 1540 BCE

This stands for "Before Common Era", or so I believe.

However one of them (attached again for reference) has a different convention:

680 CW

What does CW stand for?

Do you think it is significant that the BCE/CW is different?
artifact7.gif
 Description   680 CW?
 Filesize   1.1MB
    537 Time(s)

Unfortunately, this file is no longer in our archives.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:14 am
Page 32 of 168 [2517 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, ..., 166, 167, 168  Next
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group