Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:26 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
[UPDATE] May 24 - Sentinel - Holyoke's Wife Found
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 3 [38 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

Spankit wrote:
Perhaps Reconstructionists in Perplex City are somewhat similar to Christian Reconstructionists on Earth. More information on them here.

"Generally, Reconstructionism seeks to replace democracy with a theocratic elite that would govern by imposing their interpretation of "Biblical Law." "

So maybe the Perplex City Reconstructionists would like to replace the City Council with a theocratic elite (the Recon 8 ).


There is also a Reconstructionist form of Judaism, which is nearly the reverse.

(And! see my thread on 'structure' to add thoughts on the nature of reconstruction!) [/plug]

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
they'realloutogetme
Boot


Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 15
Location: In a bunker ... a very deep safe bunker

I agree with POTUS, a person with information about a murder suspect or victim is usually required to cooperate with the police. The Recons must be pretty powerful if they can keep the police from questioning key people in such a big case. And yet they themselves were arrested and held for some time. Hmmm....
_________________
Anakin: If you're not with me, you're my enemy.
Obi-Wan: Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes.


PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:14 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
wintermute_au
Veteran


Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Location: Sydney, AUS *(curr. Reims, FRANCE)

well, the recons obviously have enough clout to prevent the cops taking someone who is "with the cube" (more on this in that other thread...)

re the Eight who were held:
1. they aren't necessarily the top8, thats just speculated in the sentinel article... it's likely they were high-ranking; possible they were a 'sacrifice' so those responsible could get away, possible also the eight were given significant mental training to prevent the cops getting any info out of them
2. the US has held ppl in guantanamo for long time without charge, and then releasing them for lack of evidence, so i can't see why PPC can't do the same Wink

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:47 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 ICQ Number 
 Back to top 
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

People cannot be compelled to speak to police (hello Miranda), especially ones not arrested for a crime. Police, however, have the right to try to obtain information. (Lawyers or law students, feel free to add info or correct me)

The article states that they want to get information about her late husband's illegal activities, not his murder. I suspect that the 'complicated relationship' involves the City Council allowing the cult to operate without interference, probably with a long historical precedent. Money, legislative rights afforded to religious groups, or govt members may be involved. Whatever the reason, the police have no compelling reason to forcibly enter the compound, unless they are trying to find someone involved with the murder or another crime.

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 5:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
GuyP
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 584
Location: London, UK

I really don't see a big sci-fi explanation for many of the aspects of this article. They can't compel her to talk, just as in our society we have the right to remain silent (however anything you fail to mention... etc etc) I am a little surprised she wasn't arrested ('her husband was killed and she went on the run' seems like grounds for this to me) and I think this points to tension between the City and the Reconstructionists, probably because they're a bit nuts. These could be heightened by criminalisation of their practices (like outlawing polygamy in Utah or whatever.)

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:03 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Leeravitz
Unfettered

Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 450
Location: Stevenage, England

The implication I'm getting from things is that, when Holyoke was first murdered, the City police couldn't find his wife.

They've since discovered that she is living under an assumed name amongst a group of religious cultists with whom the City has uneasy relations in the first place (maybe simply because the Reconstructionists are fundamentalists of a certain stripe, and hold secular authority in contempt). They may well fear some kind of explosive fall - out if they go in all guns blazing to grab a hold of her; rioting, perhaps, or a state of siege developing (and there you have the Waco parallel).

Even more important may be the sense that 'Kostka' is now very difficult to get to, because the Reconstructionists will undoubtedly bar access, possibly even relocate her somewhere so that one of their own does not fall into 'secular' hands. It may also be the case that its difficult for the police to establish exactly when she signed up to the Reconstuctionists, and therefore, there is some uncertainty over whether or not she knows all that much about Holyoke's activties in the first place (I'm not suggesting she doesn't, merely that the police may be treading on thin ice here...).

Moreover, if she's been brainwashed, any interrogation might well prove to be a complete dead - end...
_________________
What is the New Nature of the Catastrophe?

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 6:53 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
NovacaineX
Decorated


Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 289
Location: Ohio - New York, USA

SPEC alert!

alright how about this, Spec 1.

Holyoke knew something, something that the reconstructionists didn't want him to know, they planned on brainwashing him or erasing his memories. So one night they have one of their agents go into his bar and wait for him to close. After everyone else leaves, the agent tries to knock him out, so that they can erase his memory. But Bernado doesn't give up so easily. He puts up a fight, but obviously, doesn't win. The agent stashes his body in his office, ransacks the place to make it look like a robbery, and leaves. After reporting back one of the reconstructionists thinks that maybe he told his wife whatever information he had. Instead of murdering her, they are able to simply brain wash her.

Whatever Holyoke knew probably had something to do with all of the stolen high-tech academy equipment he apparently had stashed away.

Spec 2

Holyoke was hired to steal the cube by the reconstructionists. He was supplied with the stolen equipment, and got away with it flawlessly. He delivered the cube to them, just as planned. But maybe after thinking about it for a little while he starts to feel guilty. He confides his dark secret the only person he can trust, his estranged wife. The reconstructionists somehow learn about his guilty conscience and have to take care of him. They send someone in to murder him and make it look like a robbery. They then find his wife and brainwash her and keep a tight watch on her, speaking for her to the police even, just to make sure that she won't let anything slip.

Ok, well I guess those were pretty similar but thats alright.

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:02 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
sledgecallier
Unfettered


Joined: 19 May 2005
Posts: 414
Location: Behind the Sofa...

In case you missed it... The general frustration of why the police cannot get to Holyoke's wife seems to be echoed in Violet's latest blog entry at Quirky Acuity.
_________________
SledgeCallier.
'We're gonna need a bigger boat!'

My cards to trade at Perplexcitytrades


PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 8:22 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Leeravitz
Unfettered

Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 450
Location: Stevenage, England

I think it's equally possible that Holyoke may have been involved somehow in the theft of the Cube (we now know that he appeared to have been fencing security equpiment, and some of it seems to have been stolen from the Academy), and the guilt over this affected his wife in some way. In order to 'atone' for Holyoke's misdeeds, she went to join the Reconstructionists and try to assuage her guilt over helping in the Cube's abduction.

I don't think it's necessarily obvious that the Reconstructionists actually had something to do with the theft - they could have done, but they smack of being 'obvious suspects' a little too much for my liking.

Equally, we shouldn't rule out the possibility that Mrs. Holyoke knows something, is scared of having to reveal it, and took refuge amongst the Reconstructionists purely in order to avoid the follow - up investigation.

But what's hard to determine exactly is when she left Holyoke for the Recons...all I think we know is that the police couldn't find her shortly after the murder...

One other possibility, of course, is that Mrs. H. killed her husband and going to the Recons. is a seeking of asylum. If she'd already become an adherent to the Reconstructionist cause, perhaps she assassinated him under orders because he had been involved in a scheme to appropriate the Cube. Unfortunately, without further info, I feel most of these speculations sound valid enough!
_________________
What is the New Nature of the Catastrophe?

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 8:57 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Violet
Decorated

Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 217

Leeravitz wrote:
I think it's equally possible that Holyoke may have been involved somehow in the theft of the Cube .... and the guilt over this affected his wife in some way. In order to 'atone' for Holyoke's misdeeds, she went to join the Reconstructionists and try to assuage her guilt over helping in the Cube's abduction.


We shouldn't forget that Jessica Holyoke was estranged from her husband before all this death/suspicion/speculation happened. Us girls don't take kindly to blokes throwing themselves into their work, especially if that work involves dodgy deals. Maybe Holyoke was involved in all this Cube nicking shenanigans (it must have taken ages to plan the liberation of such a highly prized object), she was fed up of it all, and so that's why she left him. Some of us get our hair cut and buy expensive shoes to compensate for major life-change, why not find religion? Could be a coping strategy now he's dead: go the whole hog and join the extremist faction...

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 1:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Leeravitz
Unfettered

Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 450
Location: Stevenage, England

Actually, now you mention it, I'm almost prepared to accept that as the most logical explanation. It's not as exciting as all this talk of Reconstructionist planting of moles, mind wiping and murder, but it's psychologically satisfying. There's no reason, just because the technological situation is so different, that simple human emotions and reactions don't condition the lifestyles of the average (and not so average) Perplexian. In a similar way, I imagine that the Alejo - Joya - Shockley situation may have more to do with an unwanted pregnancy, or an uncertain paternity, or blackmail over the issue of the pregnancy or some such than anything as exotic as mind stimulant addiction, poisoning etc.

Clearly, this might be mistaken.

If we accept that Jessica probably left Holyoke because she suspected his shady dealings, and joined the Reconstructionist movement in an attempt to cope, then her own story may be a bit of a dead end. On the other hand, it points even more certainly to the likelihood that theft of the Cube was bound up with Holyoke's activities.
_________________
What is the New Nature of the Catastrophe?

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 2:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Violet
Decorated

Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 217

At this point I'm pretty convinced Holyoke/Holyoke's bar had something to do with the theft of the Cube, and Jessica had very little, if not nothing, to do with it. There's also the fact that she joined the Recons, which I don't think makes a lot of sense if she had helped steal it. Why join the people who obviously value the Cube if you helped get rid of it?

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 2:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
spugmeistress
Unfettered


Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Posts: 460
Location: manchester, uk

Violet wrote:
Why join the people who obviously value the Cube if you helped get rid of it?


ahh but maybe she *wants* everyone to think that... perfect cover, perfect excuse for not co operating with the police, and maybe these recon ppl helped her steal it anyway, they obviously dont like it being in the hands of the academy.

rach =)

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 4:58 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
toongoon
Decorated


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 217
Location: SF Bay Area, CA

cue the Law & Order >dum-dum< ;]

Spugmeistress, I like the way you think.

If Mrs Holyoke is crazy, she's crazy like a cubist fox.

okay I need some puzzle action...

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Violet
Decorated

Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 217

They said it would one day be delivered from the hands of the academics, which it has been, but Sente seems to know for definite that it's been transported to Earth. I know there's that cute little saying about assumption, but I'm quite happy for the time being to believe Sente's got his facts straight - I for one wouldn't start a massive search with possibly untrustworthy 'outsiders' if I wasn't sure about needing them - that's far too much effort if he's not absolutely certain...

..still, it'd be an interesting if they did have it

PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2005 5:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 3 [38 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group