Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Wed Nov 13, 2024 12:36 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Meta » General META Discussion
[META][REDUX] Unfiction is Out of Game
Moderators: imbri, ndemeter
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 4 [46 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
SpaceBass
The BADministrator


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 2701
Location: pellucidar

[META][REDUX] Unfiction is Out of Game

Max Steele wrote:
And I'll say it again, the game isn't flawed if the PMs use this forum to gain information. Unfiction has no control over what a PM can and cannot do. If they want to use info on here in the game, they can.

There is no "ARG RULE" that all PMs must follow.


There may be no "ARG Rule" but there certainly is a gentleman's agreement. We hold these boards to be a) out of game and b) for collaboration and cooperation purposes. If players want to play secret teams, they should take their teams elsewhere. If PMs want to use information from here in-game that they cannot obtain in an in-game fashion, then the game IS fundamentally flawed and should be treated as such. Internal consistency is extremely important to an ARG.


Edit: Ganked from this thread. Flame on! -SpaceBass
_________________
Alternate Reality Gaming
http://www.unfiction.com/


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:01 pm
Last edited by SpaceBass on Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
tsondie21
Decorated

Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 227

SpaceBass wrote:
Max Steele wrote:
And I'll say it again, the game isn't flawed if the PMs use this forum to gain information. Unfiction has no control over what a PM can and cannot do. If they want to use info on here in the game, they can.

There is no "ARG RULE" that all PMs must follow.


There may be no "ARG Rule" but there certainly is a gentleman's agreement. We hold these boards to be a) out of game and b) for collaboration and cooperation purposes. If players want to play secret teams, they should take their teams elsewhere. If PMs want to use information from here in-game that they cannot obtain in an in-game fashion, then the game IS fundamentally flawed and should be treated as such. Internal consistency is extremely important to an ARG.



true dat
_________________
There is not try, only do or do not

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Max Steele
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 456

SpaceBass wrote:
Max Steele wrote:
And I'll say it again, the game isn't flawed if the PMs use this forum to gain information. Unfiction has no control over what a PM can and cannot do. If they want to use info on here in the game, they can.

There is no "ARG RULE" that all PMs must follow.


There may be no "ARG Rule" but there certainly is a gentleman's agreement. We hold these boards to be a) out of game and b) for collaboration and cooperation purposes. If players want to play secret teams, they should take their teams elsewhere. If PMs want to use information from here in-game that they cannot obtain in an in-game fashion, then the game IS fundamentally flawed and should be treated as such. Internal consistency is extremely important to an ARG.


Fundamentally flawed by whose view? Unfiction?

Unfiction does not set the standard or the ruleset for ARGs. If a PM uses the info they get here in their ARG, then they does it. There's nothing wrong about it. The people running UF may not like it, but it doesn't make the ARG "flawed" because of it.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 6:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
strife777
Guest


Unfiction doesn't make the ruleset, but neither do you. Its a matter of etiquette, where most PM's choose to respect Unfiction's OOG stance, and if they don't, I'm guessing they won't respect the players either and I wouldn't want anything to do with them.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:03 pm
 Back to top 
Max Steele
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 456

strife777 wrote:
Unfiction doesn't make the ruleset, but neither do you. Its a matter of etiquette, where most PM's choose to respect Unfiction's OOG stance, and if they don't, I'm guessing they won't respect the players either and I wouldn't want anything to do with them.


Well, I think that's a contradiction, because people make ARGs for the players.

What about people not respecting the PMs in the ARG they're playing?

The email sent from Deep Sleep said NOT to share this information, yet here are people sharing it.

So where's the line drawn for responsiblity?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:07 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SpaceBass
The BADministrator


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 2701
Location: pellucidar

Max Steele wrote:
The email sent from Deep Sleep said NOT to share this information, yet here are people sharing it.


If the PMs don't want certain information to be shared, there is only one solution: do not make it available to anyone. It is absolutely impossible to guarantee a secret otherwise.

Besides, instructing players on a large scale not to share information is antithetical to the entire collaborative community philosophy that underlies ARGs.
_________________
Alternate Reality Gaming
http://www.unfiction.com/


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:36 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
strife777
Guest


Respectfully, I disagree. This isn't "Alternate Reality Game On Tracks". If we did everything the PM's want, and only what they want, then why don't we watch a movie. The ARG is based on the reality of the players having the choice. We were asked not to share, sure, but choosing to share with each other isn't disrespecting the PM's, its making a choice in the game, and the PM's are free to do what they will with it INSIDE the games context. If I share my Sandman email, I run the risk of someone else entering my personal code into the website. If that happens, BOOM, they have proof inside the game, I'm thrown into carosuel and lose all my login information. They do NOT have to scour an OOG board and rain on everybody who wants to play a collabritive game.

I had a similar problem when I helped to write riddle contests. People started working together on riddles and problems geared towards the individual, and of course things were getting solved much quicker than intended. All trying to squash collaboration would just drive it further in the shadows, and all we would lose as a PM team was the feedback on where the players were, what problems they were having, and how they felt. You'll never stop people working together, as much as you seem to want to. I can pass information via IM, e-mail, a private forum, as much as I could here. The difference is the culture here is for collaboration, and I personally welcome it. If you really wanted to play non-collabritively, what are you doing on a collabritive forum in the first place?

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:37 pm
 Back to top 
Max Steele
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Posts: 456

strife777 wrote:
Respectfully, I disagree. This isn't "Alternate Reality Game On Tracks". If we did everything the PM's want, and only what they want, then why don't we watch a movie. The ARG is based on the reality of the players having the choice. We were asked not to share, sure, but choosing to share with each other isn't disrespecting the PM's, its making a choice in the game, and the PM's are free to do what they will with it INSIDE the games context. If I share my Sandman email, I run the risk of someone else entering my personal code into the website. If that happens, BOOM, they have proof inside the game, I'm thrown into carosuel and lose all my login information. They do NOT have to scour an OOG board and rain on everybody who wants to play a collabritive game.

I had a similar problem when I helped to write riddle contests. People started working together on riddles and problems geared towards the individual, and of course things were getting solved much quicker than intended. All trying to squash collaboration would just drive it further in the shadows, and all we would lose as a PM team was the feedback on where the players were, what problems they were having, and how they felt. You'll never stop people working together, as much as you seem to want to. I can pass information via IM, e-mail, a private forum, as much as I could here. The difference is the culture here is for collaboration, and I personally welcome it. If you really wanted to play non-collabritively, what are you doing on a collabritive forum in the first place?


Alright, I'll drop the issue.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:45 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

Re: [META][REDUX] Unfiction is Out of Game

SpaceBass wrote:
Edit: Ganked from this thread. Flame on! -SpaceBass


You're encouraging us to flame?

I expend all this energy restraining myself so as to avoid strewing the entrails of various idiots (of which I don't necessarily mean to imply that you are one, Max Steele) all over your nice forum (figuratively speaking, of course), to prevent any smackdowns or mockery from straying into the realm of the savage or humiliating, and now you're encouraging us to flame?!

But....but....

<head implodes>
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:46 pm
Last edited by Phaedra on Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:52 pm; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

Max Steele wrote:
Alright, I'll drop the issue.


Oh, don't do that!

I'm still waiting for confirmation that I read SpaceBass' post correctly. But if I did, I don't want to waste this opportunity to flame someone. Twisted Evil
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:47 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
SpaceBass
The BADministrator


Joined: 20 Sep 2002
Posts: 2701
Location: pellucidar

Feel free to flame me any time you want, Phaedra. Shocked
_________________
Alternate Reality Gaming
http://www.unfiction.com/


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:53 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0


Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 4033
Location: Here, obviously

SpaceBass wrote:
Feel free to flame me any time you want, Phaedra. Shocked


Oh, feh, but most of the time I agree with you. There's no irritation factor there.
_________________
Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.

World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 7:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
weephun
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 908
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC

Phaedra wrote:
SpaceBass wrote:
Feel free to flame me any time you want, Phaedra. Shocked


Oh, feh, but most of the time I agree with you. There's no irritation factor there.


pssst SpaceBass, just mention that belly-dancing is sexy, that'll get you roasted up nice and tender Wink
_________________
- Sean Stewart: "generally people like seeing their names on TV, although probably no one has had a more mixed experience with that then weephun, God bless him.
- Currently assisting Epic Games in their quest for world domination


PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
GuyP
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 584
Location: London, UK

"GAH!" and also, ahem.

OK, PM's, I know you might think it's innovative (see also "boundary-breaking", "paradigm-redefining" and "OMG CHANGING THE GENRE 4EVA!!!111!!") to treat UF as in-game. After all, I'm sure your characters can use Google.

But for mercy's sake, talk about taking a steaming crap on your own doorstep. You have all your players working together on the game you've created, when suddenly you create conditions wherein it's *impossible* for them to collaborate on it. They can't even react and post a logon and password to a new, secret discussion area, because hey - your characters can read that too, right?

Uber-realistic? Yes. Uber-dumb? Even more so.

And may I add that were you to create games with two teams in competition with one another, then it may be wise to provide your own password protected fora?

(Edit: Fare thee well, nonsensical grammar!)

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:17 pm
Last edited by GuyP on Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
yanka
Fickle


Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 1214
Location: undesirable

MaxSteele wrote:
Fundamentally flawed by whose view? Unfiction?

Fundamentally flawed to any rational person.

SpaceBass wrote:
If PMs want to use information from here in-game that they cannot obtain in an in-game fashion, then the game IS fundamentally flawed and should be treated as such. Internal consistency is extremely important to an ARG.

It's very simple logic, really. This is a place where people talk about the game: the voicing of the characters, the writing style of the PMs, the press about the game and the links/paralllels to whatever movie/game/event/etc. the game is promoting (in cases where it applies). People can say stuff like "I don't think Durga will be appearing in Halo2", "I recognize Kristen's voice" or "Jeez, this game sucks." If the game still maintains that it is not a game, then to it a place like unfiction cannot exist at all, otherwise you'll have a paradox and Durga will have to go "Whuh? I'm being voiced by someone named Kristen?" I think this is what Space means by "internal consistency". Any game that insists that it is not a game cannot intersect with a place where it is a game - it can only be one or the other - or it really is fundamentally flawed.
_________________
Annushka has already bought the sunflower oil, and has not only bought it, but has already spilled it.

PostPosted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 8:18 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 4 [46 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Meta » General META Discussion
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group