Author
Message
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
*Shrug* could come in useful later.
So for now... what?
We need to split the codes up to ones that came from the left and ones that came from the right, or else we'll never get anywhere.
So please could people post/re-post their codes with the word 'left' or 'right'?
sorry for being so pushy, I just hate that I couldn't make it to the event so I'm trying to make up for it now by translating.
Other than that, I'm stumped, So does anyone else have any ideas?
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:53 pm
Mindez
Decorated
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 165
Same, but I really need the original source (That guy with the videos, where'd he go!). I don't trust other people's interpretations, too prone to human error.
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:02 pm
mac_monkey
Decorated
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 250
It's not related to the morse code, but I'm convinced theres something in these pictures...even if nobody else does. I've been staring at them for ages. One looks like a map of the UK and others look like landshapes too.
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:05 pm
Mindez
Decorated
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 165
Erm, which pictures?
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:07 pm
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
okay. you follow that up, let us all know how it's going and if you need any help. anyone else have a suggestion?
remember that with perplex city, there are no wrong turns.
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:08 pm
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
Mindros wrote:
Erm, which pictures?
http://www.tate.org.uk/servlet/WorksList?s...id=31791&page=1
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:12 pm
mac_monkey
Decorated
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 250
The pictures from the tate.
I've put them into PS and overlayed them in random orders, and left the bottom image with a 100% transparancy and the other 5 with 50% But I'm not getting anything so far. When i just pull one image into PS it splits it into RGB channels which look like 3 of the images the red green and blue ones. Let me know if you think im following a dud lead. I could use some help tho
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:12 pm
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
mac_monkey wrote:
The pictures from the tate.
I've put them into PS and overlayed them in random orders, and left the bottom image with a 100% transparancy and the other 5 with 50% But I'm not getting anything so far. When i just pull one image into PS it splits it into RGB channels which look like 3 of the images the red green and blue ones. Let me know if you think im following a dud lead. I could use some help tho
That could be a problem. I'll look for a tutorial on google...
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:16 pm
mac_monkey
Decorated
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 250
The only reason I am so certain that this is a clue is that one of my lecturers talking about early photography before colour photography. There was this guy who took black and white photographs through colour filters, one for red, one for green and one for blue to produce 3 black and white negatives. But when he put them together and shined light through them they made a colour image.
Or maybe me just being too keen
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:20 pm
Mindez
Decorated
Joined: 26 Feb 2006 Posts: 165
Reckon you're following a dud lead, but hey, who knows?
By the way, I'm Mindez. The forum isn't sending me a verification code with Mindez, but it did with this one *shrug*
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:23 pm
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
Having no luck finding a tutorial. Next best thing would be to puy some clear plastic and print them off, then shine a light through, i guess...
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:28 pm
Belogroak
Boot
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 49
Definitely think its a dud lead as these are an actual exhibit that was uploaded to the website in 2001. I seem to remember them from a TV piece I saw on "the tate modern one year on" as well.
Bel
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:31 pm
Belogroak
Boot
Joined: 09 Dec 2005 Posts: 49
Going back to the morse code following on from "urself V"
The next bit looks like it might be "in O" split differently.
Bel
EDIT: Also Nick your first video (end of message) are you sure about the final dash? because otherwise its mighty close to the word "cube".
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:34 pm
modern_hero
Decorated
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 159 Location: UK
*Rubs temples*
So, to recap: We think this code is from V to an unknown person, telling them to meet at the tate docks at eleven.
The next part we need to check is which eleven?
what if it's not from V, but V leads onto another message (Vino?)
_________________I'm Perplexed...
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:42 pm
mac_monkey
Decorated
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 250
When we were egging tally on to solve the morse code last night we were discussing the meeting at 11 thing. We seemed to think that mind candy wouldnt expect someone to meet that late and in the dark by the tate at that time, I would like to add that "dead at eleven" seems more likely; refering to one of the characters, which could tie in with the name that ninja_granny got "susie" though I have no idea where such a name would fit in.
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:47 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending