Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:46 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
[SPEC] Hidden Message in Police Cymbalisty Files?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [29 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

[SPEC] Hidden Message in Police Cymbalisty Files?

Since the general thread has become a bit unwieldy (and, er, tangential), I'm going to post my findings here Smile

Basically, for the past few days I've been working on discrepancies between the jpg image files and the posted site content on Cymbalisty's death. I haven't gotten anywhere in positively deciphering what the message is (if there is one), but the suggestion is there, so....please help! Razz

Differences:

Crossed-out Text
Forensic Sweep - MAI
Witness Anna - S (Isaac); S (intentions)
Witness Sente - S (Isaac); you
Witness Violet(?) - 0/zero (I added this because the number 0 in Anna's testimony is *not* given a slash.)

Changed/Added Words
Witness Heidi - much; in (written) vs. at (typed)
Witness Anna - too; a (written) vs. this (typed)

Typos
In Judge Hornblair's statement, "their" instead of "there."
On the Volunteer Access page, "Maskovicz" instead of "Mascovicz."

Other slight differences include a capitalized "W" in the written version of Jason's statement, and a capitalized "H" in Anna's. Plus various punctuation differences (a couple of question marks dropped, etc.) There's also an odd extra "and" in the listing of organs in the Microscopic Description section, but it's in both versions.

So, I've investigated some things, such as soy toxins (since Isaac was such a noodle-eater, and it may interfere with the copper reuptake as well - the literature is divided, though), "MISS YOU," Aiko, etc. but it's taking too long. Aidez-moi!

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:42 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
GuyP
Unfettered


Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 584
Location: London, UK

Incidentally, I've posted the "official timeline of events" and some "differing opinions" to the wiki on the Isaac Cymbalisty page.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:31 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

After some more work, I'm wondering if the message might not read "ask why mass is too much" or something like that.

So I've asked it.

What do you think? Cymbalisty was described as "in good physical condition," "well developed and well nourished," "chest musculature is well developed," etc, but he was about 5'5" and weighed 165 lbs, which isn't really in the normal healthy range (I think) - was he a bodybuilder? is there something in his body that accounts for the extra weight?

any ideas? am I crazy? Razz

PS. Perhaps this is crude, but where is the body? It was "released" at the beginning of Feb, but to whom? Was there a funeral? A burial? Cremation? Rotting away in a box somewhere?

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 3:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Mikeyj
Unfictologist


Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 1847
Location: London

Cassandra wrote:

but he was about 5'5" and weighed 165 lbs, which isn't really in the normal healthy range (I think)


You're right, that's a BMI of 27.5, which seems to be slap-bang in the middle of over-weight (>30 is obese and 20 to 25 about right...although personally I think it's all dietician voodoo). Have you asked Anna about his personal fitness? Whether he kept himself in trim or not?

This is a good find as it's something that wouldn't be noticed during the autopsy as they don't really know what he was like pre-death (unless it's on the key...full medical records on key?) and unless someone who knew him personally IDs the body (no need with keys? DNA database?) they wouldn't notice either. Could a sudden increase in body fat be a symptom of the poison used?

I'm not sure whether I'd be capapble of tactfully asking Anna where the body is. "Oi! Where's the stiff?!". The only person that's passed through to the other side where we do know what happened to her personal matter was Ruth Coralhouse...currently in a pot in a shed somewhere before attaining her personal nirvana of fertilising a patch of Earth's ocean that was perfectly happy not to have been fertilised.

Cassandra wrote:
am I crazy?

It would be ungentlemanly of me to comment Razz

You asked for help above...willing pair of hands...what am I looking for? Smile
_________________
Irrelevant musings.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:19 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Uhtoff
Veteran

Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 75

Hmmm - BMI of 27.5 is technically overweight on the dietician voodoo chart, but I wouldn't say it rules out those descriptions, especially 'well nourished'! BMI is fairly old news as it pays no attention to build, the average rugby forward has a BMI of 28.5 according to a sports coach website, and if the numbers I found were right Martin Johnson had a BMI of 30 when he captained England at the last World Cup. I know he's not a professional sportsman, but I think someone could easily have a BMI of 27.5, still be perfectly fit and attract all those comments.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 6:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

Then perhaps we are to ask about the disputed 'mass' of ceretin in the blood? Or the mass of copper in the liver? Or the mass of green goo on the abdomen?
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:10 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
meat_paste_dave
Greenhorn


Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 6

What about the organ masses?

Lungs 800g/810g
Heart 270g (normal)
Spleen 198g (normal)
kidneys 150g/140g (normal)
Liver 1450g (normal)

Wikipedia gives masses for the heart, kidneys, liver, and found spleen mass elsewhere.

Anyone know about lungs? A quick search came up with a figure of 300-400g per lung, half the number quoted in the autopsy.

Meat_paste

PostPosted: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:44 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Crane
Veteran

Joined: 30 Apr 2005
Posts: 139
Location: England

Then I would imagine that's the mass for BOTH lungs, silly. ^^
_________________
The Beginning of the Naked Kurt Jokes:
(18:19:40) Crane: *pictures Kurt getting changed*
(18:20:21) rjw76: Crane: bad :S now I'm thinking of the same thing Razz
(18:20:26) Crane: ^ ^


PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:47 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

Generally 400g right, 300g left- depends on the amount of fluid in them though. We know there was a watery liquid in them, but this doesn't seem significant.
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:55 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Small Geezer
Boot


Joined: 10 Feb 2006
Posts: 64

Quote:
Then I would imagine that's the mass for BOTH lungs, silly. ^^


But the quoted weight(s) are

Quote:
Lungs 800g/810g


That's 800g for one and 810g for the other, so

Quote:
A quick search came up with a figure of 300-400g per lung, half the number quoted in the autopsy.


Is true is it not?

Good find Cassandra, even if you are crazy! Rolling Eyes

EDIT: If someone is leaving these messages, then who is it? Are we to get a police mole?

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:49 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
chimera245
Decorated

Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 209

Watery liquid, double weight.

Surely they would have noticed if he drowned.

SURELY it can't be that . . .

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:01 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

You know... I'd completely missed that there were two weights for the lungs. Obviously wasn't awake...

The lungs are incredibly heavy and there was fluid reported, but that doesn't necessarily mean that he'd drowned. There are other reasons that the lungs can fill with fluid; heart failure is one, infection is another.

*thinking aloud*

The liver congestion he's suffering from the copper could have caused a back-up in the venous system, forcing fluid into the lungs- this would have been a gradual thing, making him generally unwell and short of breath. It would also have made him 'heavy' as he'd have been retaining fluid and having (?)some form of right-sided heart failure.

But another thing to add to the list of 'that's not fitting in' items, good spot Smile
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:05 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ramazel
Boot


Joined: 05 Feb 2006
Posts: 59
Location: Guildford, UK

For what it's worth I found this:
Quote:
* ORGAN WEIGHTS AT AUTOPSY
A healthy, sedentary 70 kg man who is killed instantly in an accident will usually have organ weights in these ranges:
Right lung: 300-400 gm
Left lung: 250-350 gm
<snip>
Remember that the weight of the lungs can change by as much as a pound in a few moments if (say) one of the mitral valve's papillary muscles ruptures. Look at the appearances, consistencies and textures more than the numbers.

The last remark made me think that maybe there was something similar at work there, but I can't think what. The heart seems to be normal as far as I can tell.

The full text and lots more stuff on autopsy can be found at http://www.pathguy.com/lectures/necrosis.htm#organweights

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Uhtoff
Veteran

Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 75

Aye - just goes to show that if you know something then you aren't necessarily the right person to look at it. I saw 800g, thought 'That's about right for the lungs' and moved on!

Possible reasons -
OOG error (always possible)
Pulmonary oedema (fluid in the lungs that has leaked from the blood vessels either through pressure changes, heart failure, low blood proteins or possibly toxins)
Drowning/Lungs filled with external fluid

Papillary muscle rupture is usually associated with a previous heart attack, or possibly chest trauma, neither of which we had, and would cerrtainly be something that would have been mentioned on the pathologist report. I doubt the liver has anything to do with it, for liver disease to be severe enough to cause a low enough blood protein level to cause pulmonary oedema you'd be very unwell indeed.

Duckie you've got that about face, right sided heart failure can lead to liver congestion and liver failure, not the other way round. Cirrhosis -> portal venous congestion and hypertension, not systemic venous. Also you need left sided heart failure for congestive pulmonary oedema and in that case his heart would very much not be normal.

In the light of the mostly otherwise normal autopsy you'd have to suggest that fluid soaked lungs would either be caused by inhaled water, instilled water or possibly some kind of inhaled toxin that had caused leaky capillaries.

[EDIT] - Possible inhaled toxins include phosgene, ozone, chlorine, Teflon fumes, nitrogen dioxide and smoke. Sure there's more, but that's a start.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:52 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

Uhtoff wrote:
Duckie you've got that about face, right sided heart failure can lead to liver congestion and liver failure, not the other way round.


Thanks Smile See? Stoodents are rubbish!
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:59 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [29 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group