Author
Message
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
Brotherhood of the six - Hidden message? This is bugging me, I brought up before on perplexcity's forum, but I've been looking again and there are deliberate errors everywhere on the www.brotherhoodofthesix.com website.
I can't make any sense of it, so far I have
'for it egeetehicm'
Doesn't look like much, but the start looks like English to me
Anyone else looked at this or have any thoughts? Before I completely lose the plot! *fwibble*
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:04 pm
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
I think it's to indicate they're just a bit rubbish rather than a kloo.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:08 pm
Benjaminbrum
Boot
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 52 Location: Birmingham, UK
Re: Brotherhood of the six - Hidden message?
Small Geezer wrote:
Anyone else looked at this or have any thoughts? Before I completely lose the plot! *fwibble*
I've looked and can only spot a couple of mistakes...
Can you be more specific?
Take us through page by page...
(There's the "believe" on the "What we believe" page. And on the same page at point 5 "true int eh universe")
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:14 pm
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
Will do when I get home. Off the top of my head though the first 2 mistakes and the first or second pages are.
They write how we life the belief instead of live. Hence the f
Porgramme instead of programme. Hence the or
The rest I'll post when I get home and have a chance to look through.
Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 1:28 pm
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
OK here goes with what I've found.
Home page
Quote:
how we lif e that faith today"
Should be liv e, therefore we get an F
Quote:
Community outreach por grammes
Should be pro grammes, thus the OR
History
Quote:
whii ch is one with the universe
Additional I
Way of Life
Quote:
four festival int he year
From this we get T (possibly HE too?)
[not so sure about this bit]
Quote:
three days prayer, meditation.
Missing AND?
Quote:
a cheerful celbration
Missing E
Quote:
brining its enlightenment
Missing G
Quote:
the mystical alignement
Additional E
What we Beleive
Title is mispelt IE or EI?
Additional E
Quote:
presently incarnated
Not sure what they are trying to say, but should that not be incarcerated? If so we get N or CER
Space error and spelling, therefore TEH?
JOIN US!!!
Quote:
of this over commeric al festival
IC
Schedule
M
Not sure what you get if you put all that together, but it looks something like
FOR IT (AND) EGEEIEN (or CER) THE ICM
Anyone else able to cast fresh eyes and see if there's anything in it or if I'm just getting paranoid about poor spelling?
EDIT: Corrected poor spelling!
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:31 am
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
Paranoid.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:55 am
Benjaminbrum
Boot
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 Posts: 52 Location: Birmingham, UK
There is also the "answers" page but there doesn't appear to be any mistakes on that page...
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:10 am
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
Thank you for your well thought out and well presented argument!
I couldn't find anything on the answers page either. I've looked at it so many times now, I probably can't see the wood for the trees (or some other cliche!)
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:12 am
ryandrew
Unfettered
Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 575 Location: Manchester
Yeah, incarnated is a word. Often used in a religious context to mean something being embodied, or giving human form. So you can cross those off your list.
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:20 am
Small Geezer
Boot
Joined: 10 Feb 2006 Posts: 64
I just couldn't see what they were trying to say with that? The cube is hidden it's not embodied or in any human form anywhere, unless I'm not 100% up on their beliefs?
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:50 am
ryandrew
Unfettered
Joined: 21 Jan 2005 Posts: 575 Location: Manchester
Heh, you do get how religious groups work right? Usually something they consider divine is said to have an earthly form. People worship it. Etc.
Quote:
'''The Cube''' currently held without cause in the Perplex City Academy by those who do not venerate its ancient light is an incarnation of the One True Cube, whiich is One with the Universe.
Remember, this site is supposed to predate the theft of the cube.
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:04 am
Brian Morton
Decorated
Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 178 Location: San antonio
I am courious about this though the "powers that be" are sticklers for spelling and punctuation and the make a website that looks like this? I'm thinking that it's either a red herring or their way of showing the Brotherhood in a ignorant and childish light. The errors been talked about in other threads I just wish I knew how to link to them. I'm sorry
_________________"Damn you, Smith- damn you to hell."
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:40 am
EvilGenius
Decorated
Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 227 Location: Vancouver
Oh dear, another round of spelling? Some of us working on Riemann went through an extended period of proof reading to no avail - seems rather silly in hindsight; I'm sure I know that card verbatim as a result, and made about 50 attempts at a solve. Cassandra, I believe, is documenting spelling errors from the Sentinel (C, you are my hero - that's amazing), and now the Brotherhood website? Not to suggest the line of inquiry isn't valuable, if only to rule it out, but how boring if it turns out to be true. I can tell you what the Brotherhood website is - crap. Eye-gouging, head-scratching, brain-mucking crap. What do you Brits say - "bollocks," is it? That's what this website is. Or it might be important.
Do carry on . . .
PS. - I hope the colors and typefaces aren't supposed to be relevant 'cause the coding sucks too, HTML errors that display text in the wrong color, etc.
Posted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 8:28 pm
European Chris
Unfictologist
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: London's trendy Whitechapel
Yes, but it's rubbish on purpose.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 3:53 am
duckiemonster
Unfettered
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 554 Location: Oxford, UK
Still, it's better than some websites I've seen out there.
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:28 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending