Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:23 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
[UPDATE] Quirky Acuity - 31/3/06 - Last Page
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 2 [27 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2
Author Message
psyche
Veteran


Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 72

Re: agreed

Edited for extreme grumpiness.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:00 pm
Last edited by psyche on Sat Apr 01, 2006 4:02 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Mokey Fraggle
Unfettered


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 393
Location: FL, USA

My vote goes to the page being false.

-- Miranda is simply not to be trusted. She's far too sugary-sweet, and Violet's in no position (clearly being in love with Kurt) to point that out, lest she look pathetically jealous. And the fact that the one person we can turn to to get her hands on the page before Violet reads it is someone we've been looking at sideways for a while -- with IC's suspicious death in mind -- is far too questionable.

-- Exactly, Josiah. We've always been under the impression IC was killed because he was getting too close to something. The only thing we knew of that was potentially sensitive was the diary. Also, we wrote a damn book so we could read that thing. Are they really going to tell us it was completely useless afterall?

-- I agree with the people who say the page seems out of character with the other pages. I'm going to go back and read those previous ones now to see if I can pinpoint anything specifically different about the phrasing that would suggest a different author. Does anyone here do that sort of thing well? Shocked

-- Perhaps your email to Violet will show us something, Josiah. I think that's a good plan.

-- Violet herself said it was odd the page was released. That tells me
we should find it odd, too.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 1:26 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

I find it scarier that Miranda "let" Violet "peek in" at the book. Has she moved into his office already? If MK becomes Head Librarian, Violet ought to buy her own supply of Neurocept Razz

I emailed Anna asking what Cymbalisty had written in his "chicken-scratch" about Violet and the diary specifically.

Also, I don't see why this necessarily *has* to be a false page, at least concerning most of the content. I find it intriguing that Edwina Mountling allegedly became pregnant 9 months before the event that defined year AC/BC. Also, I'm wondering if the lord of Viendenbourg is the father, and whther his name is Castille at all (could be V. Castellan, someone entirely different, etc.) Edwina may have gone along on the trip specifically to conceive a child, in fact. Fast-forward to last year, and exactly at the same season, Joya mysteriously became pregnant, won't reveal the father, and ran away from her sudden wedding into hiding; all while a mysterious faction is trying to replicate the events (or at least access the power that led to) that occurred 269 years ago. (Joya! avoid Ryan Cahill! Avoid!)

but then, I love spec, and the page certainly could have been altered or tampered with, rendering the above even more nonsense Razz

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:01 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
echidna
Decorated

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Notts, UK

cassandra wrote:
I find it intriguing that Edwina Mountling allegedly became pregnant 9 months before the event that defined year AC/BC.


I have to say that I find it a bit intriguing that Edwina knew she was pregnant only 6 days (21st April) after allegedly conceiving with Granier (15th April). Seems a bit too quick and convenient for me - or maybe they just had very accurate pregnancy home-test kits back in 18th century Perplex City!

Just to add my own bit of random spec - I was thinking about the Third Power symbol and what it might represent. You could see the large dark squares as representing a man and a woman whose union produces a child (the smaller lighter square in the middle). Ok, I did say it was random Smile .

(Though if we are looking for a mysterious child belonging to a long-hidden bloodline then frankly it's all gone a bit too Da Vinci Code for my liking Rolling Eyes )

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
jetsam
Greenhorn

Joined: 11 Feb 2006
Posts: 8
Location: Bonnie Scotland

Quote:
I must think on this and these pages are no longer secure enough to do so.

More to come/find?
Shocked All these cliffhangers!!

PostPosted: Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
lhall
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 411
Location: Portland, Oregon

I do think it's a bit strange for the last entry, but based on the rest of the diary's story, it's exactly what I was expecting to happen.

Further, Violet had been working closely with Isaac throughout the entire translation, no? Don't you think she'd notice if something was different about this one remaining page? The paper quality, the style of the writing, the handwriting itself, the ink color, unusual translations (as if someone modern had been writing them), etc.?

Violet is sensible. She may secretly hate Miranda because she's in love with Kurt but doesn't know it yet, but she wouldn't say multiple times that she's helpful and sweet if she didn't mean it -- she's naturally sarcastic, and a little suspicious of dubious characters. She's used to watching peoples' poker faces for the slightest traces of emotion. And she's good at her job. I get the feeling that if something was even slightly off about the page, she would have noticed and let us know.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:53 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
w0lfwoman
Boot


Joined: 31 Mar 2006
Posts: 24
Location: coast of california

date of pregnancy

in response to:

"I have to say that I find it a bit intriguing that Edwina knew she was pregnant only 6 days (21st April) after allegedly conceiving with Granier (15th April). Seems a bit too quick and convenient for me - or maybe they just had very accurate pregnancy home-test kits back in 18th century Perplex City!"

I think they may have been intimate longer than that, my guess might be April 2nd, when she was emotional and broke down in tears. That would allow enough time to suspect pregnancy, if she had intercourse the typical earliest day she could ave gotten pregnant, (day 11) then she should start her period on the 19th of the month. 10 days late is a definite sign. Plus whatever it is she does numerologically should tell her.

The thing about the 15th was a dismissal of the chamber girl by granier, which would make it likely that the intimacy with EM was before that. Also, Granier, while snippy about Edwina in his diary at one point, he doesn't seem to write that way later, in fact on the 3rd, takes up her cause and makes a request in her name.

Any thoughts? And any symbolism if the child is concevied on a certain date?

kimmer

PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:03 am
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
European Chris
Unfictologist


Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 1264
Location: London's trendy Whitechapel

Firstly, Nice cat.

Reading other pages in the diary it wouldn't be a shock if Granier had been 'intimate' (in numerous debauched positions) with a variety of chambermaids-however in early diary entries it seemed as though Edwina was a bit cold towards him.

It seems he got it up her on the 15th first, there was a 'secret' on the 21st, so maybe that was a concern rather than a certainty, and was told on the 29th. Doesn't seem out the ordinary. But I've never missed a period so what do I know.
_________________
http://www.hayfestival.com/archive/2006/05/blasphemy-debate.aspx
The internet, giving the entire world a license to opine, since 1989.
http://littleatoms.com/


PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:52 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
duckiemonster
Unfettered


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 554
Location: Oxford, UK

I think she'd *just* be late, if indeed the 15th was the first time that he 'got it up her' (gah, Chris... You're upsetting my feminine sensibilities. Again.)

I reckon the cube told her Wink
_________________
duckiemonster.com w00t!

PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:14 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
echidna
Decorated

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 288
Location: Notts, UK

I read it that she first slept with Granier on the 15th, strongly suspected she was pregnant by the 21st and was sure by the 29th. Following Cassandra's spec:

cassandra wrote:
I find it intriguing that Edwina Mountling allegedly became pregnant 9 months before the event that defined year AC/BC. Also, I'm wondering if the lord of Viendenbourg is the father, and whther his name is Castille at all (could be V. Castellan, someone entirely different, etc.) Edwina may have gone along on the trip specifically to conceive a child, in fact.


yeah it's feasible that she suspected she was pregnant but to be so sure so quickly seems a bit too convenient to me. If it was a genuine bolt-out-of-the-blue, unwanted, illegitimate pregnancy then surely she'd have spent longer panicking, being in denial, convincing herself it was just down to stress, etc. I think it's possible that the child was planned for a reason (assuming the page is real, of course).

PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:34 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
cassandra
Entrenched


Joined: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 831

what I was pondering: that to harness the full power of the mined Cube-material, they would need to link it somehow to a sentient, willing creature (perhaps "bred" for the purpose).

I didn't think that Granier was necessarily the father, though: the scenario I was envisioning involved conception on the night of the Builder's Celebration, 21 March (good time for beginnings and foundations and all that); then on April 2 we see Edwina acts "peevish and irritable, and appears tired. Today, when I made to fetch her for dinner, she barked that "unlike you, I am not constantly concerned with the needs of my stomach and the desires of my...." [here she used a low word which startled me considerably]. When I expressed my astonishment at being spoken to in this fashion, she began to cry. Women are a constant mystery."; around the 8th-15th she sleeps with Granier; April 21 she suspects pregnancy (one month after possible conception); and by 29 April she's sure of it.

All this assumes that the page is unaltered and not metaphorical: that she was pregnant and that it wasn't a story to get rid of Granier or to cover up a different problem or research.

PS. Edwina Mountling > Fran Mendling? Heh Razz It amuses me.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 4:39 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Magellan Lin
Greenhorn

Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 4
Location: Warwickshire, England

It seems clear that the place where Grannier and Edwina were working is Veindenbourg.
It makes sense that Sente knows of/is in charge of the drilling. The original project was run by Master Adamek and it is likely the knowledge of what is being mined in Viendenbourg was passed from Master to Master.
It appears what ever was mined was destructive hence the tests and it seems logical that this destructive power - whatever it was, ended the war.

The question is - where does the Cube fit in. Was the cube the weapon itself -made from the mined material or is it a defence.
If its a weapon it makes little sense for Sente and the authorities to keep mining, all their enemies are gone - those that are left are subversive groups- weapons of mass destruction do nt work on these. Perhaps there is a new threat we dont know about.

If it isnt a weapon perhaps it was a defence - something that protected the city from the 'enemy' or from the device they used against the others in the war.

These two open two other reasons for the cube to be stolen.

If a weapon it could have been stolen not to use but to stop it being used - by sending it to earth . On Earth the weapon is safe from anyone there who wants to use it and makes no sense if the 'enemy' wanted to use it. even if it is just a religous artifact why send it to earth - it would be no where near the worhsippers.

If its a defence against a weapon or somekind of protection then whoever took it did so to render the city helpless.
This could be why the Academy is mining more 'stuff' to make a new one to replace what was stolen.

Just a few of my thoughts...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 10:47 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 2 [27 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Perplex City » PXC: General/Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group