Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 14, 2024 7:50 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: PoTC and Volvo
[DISCUSSION] End Game (Part 2)
View previous topicView next topic
Page 9 of 14 [205 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Author Message
adamrj
Guest


Sept Citez

summergirl:

I did a bit of research into this island (Sept Citez - Seven Cities) and as usual got nowhere. It seems to be a mythical island the Chinese discovered long before Columbus found the new world. However the suggested location of the island in the modern world is off Canada, not in the Caribbean. There doesn't appear to be any real island in that location, so probably just another red herring.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:11 am
 Back to top 
Freddyy
Greenhorn

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Location: Norwich, UK

Sepratez

I also look for the "Sepratez" Island. In the following antique maps, I found some islands which appear in the East of Bermuda Island. I think ther could be only rocks in the middle of the Ocean Surprised

http://mapmogul.com/catalog/images/JR0023.jpg
http://mapmogul.com/catalog/images/JR0014.jpg

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Syndil
Greenhorn

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 5

There seems to be a bit of concern over a few things. There is the 1st column in the inside of the box with the missing triangle, and there is the unused clue SSSSSSST. I believe I know how they go together.

The clue that gave us the keyword SSSSSSST was:

"All eight but one will see the same
For you to find that final name"

It seems clear to me that "final name" refers to the final 8 digit solution. Thus, the keyword SSSSSSST must somehow be used to find the solution. But how?

Consider the inside box of the US/UK puzzles. We have 7 columns that make perfect squares, and 1 unique column with one triangle missing.

Now consider the keyword. Seven like characters followed by 1 unique character.

Perhaps the keyword is a template.

Therefore instead of simply ordering the numbers on the lid according to 12345678 (come on, too simple!), we should make sure that the unique member of the sequence is at the end of the solution. The column with the missing triangle represented the 4th number in the sequence, so we should start with the 5th number of the sequence, and order the solution according to 56781234, so that the 4 is at the end. Thus I believe the US solution is 24764364.

It is also important to note that the same riddle and clue was used for each country, so I looked at the puzzles for the other countries to see if it still worked out. In order for my theory to be sound, there should be a unique characteristic to one of the sequence indicators found in the box for each country. And there is.

For the UK, it is the same as the US. They have the exact same columns just arranged in a different order. The unique column for the UK puzzle is the 4th column (same as the US 1st column). Therefore their sequence is the same as the US sequence, 56781234, which makes the UK solution 90363889.

For Japan, the unique character is fairly easy to see. It is the grouping of 3 dots, which is the only grouping that requires a diagonal connection to one of the dots. So the JP sequence is 45678123, making their solution 08829365.

For Spain/Austria, I believe the unique character is the grouping of lines shaped like a zero, as zero is the only non-positive number represented. However this is admittedly slightly troubling, as the zero already represented the 8th number in the sequence, so putting it last according to the template does not change the solution, as the sequence is still 12345678.

For the US/UK puzzles, I sincerely doubt that the missing triangle was either a mistake, unintentional or a red herring. I beleive it was put there intentionally and for a reason. Many people who have noticed the missing triangle have wondered why it was there, and I believe this method explains why quite nicely.

This method resolves the issue of the missing triangle, uses the as yet unused keyword SSSSSSST, and fits perfectly with the Port Royal riddle to boot. The riddle itself tells us that the keyword will be used to find the final name, which explains why it was not used on Port Royal itself. The riddle is outright telling us the keyword is to be used for the final solution.

To further strengthen my case, consider that Volvo intended us to start with the Port Royal riddle. After all, that was the first part of the final solution that we were given. It just seems that most people completely forgot about the riddle after they got to Somewhere.

After reading the Port Royal riddle, it should have been clear that the riddle is intended to help find the final solution. We should have filed that bit of information away in the back of our minds, and we should have been actively seeking ways to apply the riddle and keyword to the final puzzle. Therefore when we found the missing triangle, instead of causing us confusion and strife, it should have been our eureka moment, resolving the issue of how to use the keyword.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:59 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
adamrj
Guest


Good thinking

Good thinking, but still not quite conclusive to me. The zero non-positive number bit feels a little like clutching at straws - to be honest you're never going to notice in isolation that there's an odd-one-out in a string of numbers with a zero in it. I'm not sure whether all the final puzzles were intended to be solved with knowledge of the other countries' ones, but I very much doubt it. My personal feeling is that the triangle is simply a mistake - it would be quite difficult to spot without an expert Photoshop grid like the one on this forum. And perhaps the different puzzles were added in haste when they realised people were previewing the jp site? If it is simply a mistake, it's amazing how much it's possible to read into very little isn't it! Either that, or the final answer will have us all baffled at its complexity - I really have no idea which way it'll go.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:15 pm
 Back to top 
dlightle
Guest


Wow

Syndil, I like that thought; I don't know if it's right, but that's definitely a lot more sound and reinforced than what I had come up with to date. I think, to add to your thoughts, that the oddball index digit could be related to the 5s in the Spain puzzle, as there were 2 different looks to the 5 Confused

I don't feel that the odd triangle out is a mistake; they too deliberately had a piece go unused in each column, which makes a perfect connection in every column but this one (the UK version is just a scramble of the US one). So it's hard to imagine they'd be 'careless' over something like that. Instead, I think it's very intriguing to see SSSSSSST and the 7-filled, 1-nearly filled square correlate. Especially considering the fact that it went unused. And this *was* a 2-part puzzle basically, that was just counted as 2 puzzles. Just more thoughts Smile

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:26 pm
 Back to top 
Twoswords
Guest


I, however, (and I realise I may be alone here!) reasoned SSSSSSST is the noise a snake makes - so I was back at Lundy again, where there are no snakes (a saint chased them away according to legend) taking you from SSSSSSST to 'serenity', follow?

Or maybe not!

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:50 pm
 Back to top 
Syndil
Greenhorn

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 5

If the missing triangle was simply a mistake we are to ignore, then you are still left with the issue of the Port Royal riddle that tells us it is to be used for the "final name" and the unused keyword.

Also, I was able to find the missing triangle without Photoshop. When I was solving the puzzle on my own, I simply used a piece of graph paper. I made X's in all of the squares using a straightedge, and flled in the bits from the puzzle and wrote the remainder down seperately. I immediately noticed the missing triangle.

And yes, I don't believe we were supposed to be aware of the other countries' puzzles. I simply used them to check my work.

The Spain/Austria puzzles are a bit troublesome, but not if you consider that there is a definite difficulty gap among the puzzles, which I believe is intentional and may be related to the population size of the country for which each puzzle is intended.

The US clearly has the most difficult puzzle, with the inside sequence consisting of the shape columns and the outside lid consisting of cryptic lines.

The UK is next, with the same columns inside (in different order), but with much easier to decipher numerals on the lid.

The difference in the order of columns from the US puzzle is also significant here. When I was solving the US puzzle and started with the 1st column and noticed that it indeed did NOT make a complete square, I believed that I was on the wrong track. Adding the symbols from the first column gave me one additional triangle and one blank triangle, which hardly seems like a bit of useful information. Trust me, that little missing triangle caused me to stop and search for other methods. Wasted tons of my time.

In the UK version, you would have gotten 3 complete squares until you got to the column with the missing triangle, thus making the inside of the UK puzzle slightly easier than the US puzzle. It would have been much easier to ignore that blank triangle and continue on after having been successful with the first 3 columns.

And think about it. If the UK puzzle was indeed intended to be slightly easier than the US puzzle as I am postulating, it again makes perfect sense why the US puzzle starts with the troublesome column and the UK puzzle does not. It is as if the puzzlemakers knew the column with the missing triangle would cause confusion, so they put it first for the more difficult puzzle. What other reason would they have to change the order of the columns anyway?

Japan has the next easiest puzzle, with the dots on the inside and easy to decipher numerals on the lid.

And finally there is Spain/Austria. The easiest to decipher inside (as the inside numerals are CLEARLY not the answer, and counting the strokes clearly gives you a sequence) with easy to decipher numbers on the lid.

If the Spain/Austria puzzles were in fact intended to be the easiest, then perhaps that is why my method does not alter the final sequence. With or without the keyword template, you still get the right answer.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Syndil
Greenhorn

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 5

Re: Wow

dlightle wrote:
I think, to add to your thoughts, that the oddball index digit could be related to the 5s in the Spain puzzle, as there were 2 different looks to the 5 Confused

Well the differences in the 5's were simply there because one was made using 5 strokes and the other was made using 6 strokes. Obvious clues that the numerals themselves were not the answer but rather the number of strokes was.

Besides, if the 5 was intended to be the unique character, which 5 do we choose? I still think it was the zero.

Then again my entire theory could be completely off target and making things more difficult than they need to be. It could be that "final name" simply refers to the fact that SSSSSSST was to be the final keyword we were to search for, and the triangle really could have just been an error or a red herring. But I doubt it. Wink

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Twoswords
Guest


BTW for those that haven't realised - Abaco Island is the main island of a group in which Castaway Cay is one of the smaller (maybe smallest) island.

In the past Abaco was populated but Castaway Cay had maybe only one permanent inhabitant. It's history then became a bit 'chequered' - it had an airstrip - so you can guess it's history.

Disney then developed it into a resort - it may share co-ordinates with the other larger islands.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:04 pm
 Back to top 
rbing
Greenhorn

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Location: UK

End Game

It's only my opinion, but I think "SSSSSSST" is the Final Name, referred to in the clue "All Eight but one.......etc."

And, where it asks:
"Is it tamed? Are they named? Be sure. Make sure. Again and again",
just asks whether you need to check again for extra numbers/letters for the coords to "Somewhere".

As I say, It's only my opinion! Sometimes, we tend to look for things that aren't there and overcomplicate things. All the answers have followed the same pattern, just about.

I think the missing piece in the boxes is just cosmetic to make the box look battered a bit.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
medwards2020
Boot

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 20
Location: Charlotte, NC

Little Abaco

Two Swords is not tachnically correct, Castaway Cay is an Island in the BVI, in the Caribbean proper. The Bahamas are quite a bit north of there, and technically not part of what is usually considered the Caribbean. Little Abaco Island is a narrow island just east of Grand Bahama. And the final location 2558n7713w is on the lower part of Little Abaco Island. See the satelite image on www.terraserver.com by entering coordinates

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Twoswords
Guest


You're right it's seven miles away. My mistaken location came from reading this:

http://outside.away.com/magazine/0199/9901blackbeard.html

Interesting bit of background.

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:30 pm
 Back to top 
Buttercup
Greenhorn

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 4

Castaway Cay

Medwards, you are sooooo wrong. Castaway Cay is part of the Bahamian archipelago, not the BVI. Rolling Eyes As far as saying that Bahamas are further north and not part of the Caribbean, that is wrong too Crying or Very sad You might have meant that Bermuda was not part of the Caribbean.

Twoswords, I find it interesting that Castaway Cay is seven miles away from our last stop at "Somewhere" (Little Abaco, in Bahama) Wink

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Twoswords
Guest


So you think maybe I was off line at Lundy then! LOL

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:08 pm
 Back to top 
Boz
Kilroy

Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 1

Registration

I just submitted my final answer and was then required to fill out a form. Just wondering if this was true for everyone who submitted their answer.

"The first three (3) Entrants to successfully complete all fifteen (15) Puzzles and submit the correct final answer, will be deemed a Potential Finalist. The Potential Finalist will be required to complete and submit a Finalist Registration Form by submitting his/her complete name, mailing address, daytime and evening telephone numbers and a valid email address."

they wouldent bother to have everyone fill out the form if their answer was incorrect, right?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 9 of 14 [205 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » GAME: PoTC and Volvo
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group