unforum

[dv8]

Gotcha. Anyways, I've sent Foo an email trying to get in. I'll let you all know if he bites.

[djsampson]

I'm in with Brackin. I recieved a reply e-mail from him. Here it is:


I'm going to trust you Harris. I believe in trusting people. I've learned that Foo has likely hacked the feed and may even be receiving new transmissions daily. If so then he must be getting help from outside. If you can identify how and what he is hiding, then perhaps we can stop them.

I'm happy that some of the true believers are still on my side. See if you can infiltrate foo's team. One of them may be the key to this. Use their arrogance against them. I am currently working on something that will enable us to access the feed as well.

That's assuming you succeed in locating his hack. Good luck. Every day we wait they will have a greater advantage. Screw the future. Change the present!

-AB

On 11/16/06, Harris <x_clamation_1998> wrote:

I am very interested in helping you. I personally haven't trusted FOO since he left you in the middle of testing. I think he is up to something and we must stop him and get you back online. Please accept my allegiance to your cause and please keep in touch .

[djsampson]

Some how we need to get someone into Foo's circle of Friends. Foo is a little untrusting we need one of the Five to Join us. Problem is I am not sure how or if we are even suppost to know who the Five are. Or if we are aloud to contact the Five to turn them to our side on UF. Moderaters I need a judgement here. What is aloud as far as contact and knowing who is who on Foo's side. Should we know who they are. Or should it be disregaurded and no contact should be made.

[alia]

I e-mailed and got the same response as djsampson. Any ideas on turning someone traitor?

[naknak]

i emailed foo earlier trying to gain his trust (its on the first page) the only hint he gives to of who the five are, is that one of them is MONTREAL.

here is it again

[imbri]

[troon]

I e-mailed Brackin asking to help, he responded:

[Forgery]

My response from Brackin. The use of my name being 'stephen' it seems to suggest to me this may be some kind of Auto reponse. I finished the email I sent him as Forg but instead it is replied as my full name and with a lowercase s, as it is as my email information thing. It suggests Auto Response to me.

[Agent Lex]

Just to let you all know, I emailed Brackin aswell, with a generic "I'm with you, etc" mail, mentioning the company and perhaps getting the data from them. Got the same generic response, with this extra tidbit:

[Forgery]

Ok, well a search for Defend Corp gives me this here

I randomly clicked on the one date for Wed 13th Sept

and read info such as...

[dv8]

Foo's blog has been updated. Seems like something's about to go down.

http://foo-defiant.blogspot.com/

[Phaedra]

I'd like to second Imbri, and also add/reinforce a few points:

1) Just because the characters require you to take sides in-game doesn't mean you can't work together here. This is one of the reasons it's important to keep Unfiction out-of-game and independent of direct PM influence. They can't control how the game is played here. And if the community of players really doesn't like something they're being told to do, often their collective will is enough to force a design change.

2) Even though the PMs seem to be requiring you to take sides in-game, that doesn't necessarily mean that they actually expect you to hold to those sides out-of-game.

3) If the player base as a whole decides to actually take sides and attempt to hide information from the other "side" and work against them, I think you're going to have a hard time playing the game here on Unfiction. There's nothing to stop people from reading the other side's threads, and I think I can predict with a reasonable amount of certainty that the moderators and admins here aren't going to do anything to help enforce any such boundaries. As Imbri noted, the only things that aren't "allowed" here are the things expressly prohibited in the Terms of Service.

[djsampson]

I just had a thought since we recieved an email from foo (thanks naknak) he mentions MONTREAL well none of us know who he is so I thought I would send an e-mail to Brackin to see if he knows who MONTREAL is. I will post as soon as I get a responce.

[themandotcom]

[djsampson]

Well I have nothing from Brackin yet, But I did receive a response from Foo. I am trying to shake him up a bit and cause some distrust. There's nothing like dissension in the ranks here's my email and Foo's response.



"And why if they live in such a perfect world"

You are right. I do not trust you Harris, but only because you make yourself difficult to trust. How did you aquire this information? One might suspect that you are either a spy or a fool.

_Foo Defiant!

On 11/16/06, Harris <x_clamation_1998> wrote:

Foo, I would be careful were you tread and who you trust. I live by the mado that know one deserves the trust they ask for. Question everything, even the person you are in contact with in the future. Have you ever considered that he maybe using you to change the future. Why do you put so much blind trust in someone who knows twenty some years more information than you do. And why do they need you to change it. It makes no sense Foo. Trust no one not even me or your Five. As you change the future, you change the present.