unforum

[Pixiestix]

That would be wonderful. Was that a feature on the forums way back? I don't remember it... But the other forums I frequent do that.

In response to djsampson - I fully agree this is a social forum. There idn't a need to stay on topic 24-7. A good thread jack now and then while it can be annoying to many is fine in the eyes of others. If the context of many of the "i'm in" posts were also intros, or social discussions off topic, it probably wouldn't have bothered me as much. There were many in that thread specifically that were much longer than one liners - however that thread is not the first, nor i am sure the last, like it. If i continue to have to further explain my actions, and what i mean, and the difference between a, b, c, and d... Then people are going to think i'm still upset - i'm not. I've never, however, been one to not respond to a pick.

also, thebruce... smarty alec!!! yes i noticed.

Giskard - when you explained it in chat, it made sense to me. It made more sense than {no offense space} Space saying to just deal with it. And for that i thank you.

now then, with it being all against three {with one not speaking up}, and us both saying "you are right, we are wrong. we don't agree, but we have no choice in the matter" could this discussion please continue {if discussion to be continued} without further attempts to quote me as evidence? LOL

[Giskard]