unforum

Mokey Fraggle

Well, I have one from YouTube listed there now. I picked it because it looked pretty and the music was nice. Very Happy

Yes, I am a total girl. Laughing

*Aw! Thanks, Schrijvertje!

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 3:10 pm

agentgr33n · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 574

differential

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:15 pm

marnut

Hey guys- I just got a chance to look at this stuff today. I left a link up for the good doctor that I think is pretty cool.

Soooo... I was thinking- that video that he posted that he says will blow our minds. Do you think the date and time in the video are relevant? He seems to have put a lot of emphasis on the post. Yes? No? Somethings telling me maybe not because the source is from a government website and it's the first file in the solar directory. (link: http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/solcd/).

But in the off chance the dates are important, the line with the date and time starts at

C2 2000/01/12 21:23

and ends at

C2 2000/01/15 23:31

with photographs every 15-30 minutes or so in between. It's probably nothing...

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:54 pm

fizzcharlson

Hi Mcgritts and all nomoreparenters,
I wouldn't worry too much about getting them 'heated' this is, after all, a game and everyone of us is 'playing' it according to our instincts, rationale and logic. I'm sure and certain that the PM's expect the unexpected and understand that we will manipulate, inviegle and obfuscate if that is our will. Some players are more naturalistic others are more character driven and others are slippery: it takes a combination of all these traits to achieve our ends, I believe. Post whatever you wish my friend I'm sure that's the whole point of the task.

For what it's worth I got a post from Hope, I had wrestled with the rationale behind securing a reply and was intrigued by Mokey's use of the phrase TINAG (this is not a game.) It made sense to me that those of us who had secured replies did so when at our most human and real, the long sermonius attempts I had made with countless blatant triggers and traps fell by the wayside whilst simple human communication managed to get a reply. So I tried it, and it worked. It might be helpfull for future reference that we try to be a little more 'us' as it seems to strike a chord with the PM's. I am gratefull that she replied all the same Very Happy

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:04 pm

fizzcharlson

Sorry to post again but I didn't see marnut's post when I posted mine.
I've been thinking about the challenge marnut and was flung back to the days of the nomoreparents.com website. The twelve animated gifs were posted in a directory known as flares. We linked this site to Hendler via the anagramatic use of the word ORBITAS on the site and on his homepage. He states in his blog that he has shown us his 'flares' now we should show him ours.
I'm silently wondering if he means creating 'flares' like he did with the original site. This is just wondering aloud of course.
Who knows, I'm quite happy with my submission and Mokey's is stunning but I did wonder if there may be a hidden element to this?????

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:16 pm

Mokey Fraggle

With a friend right now and can't do much, but I got a message from Hope! Here it is (hehe, I got hugs and kisses!):

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:58 pm

agentgr33n · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 574

personal

**Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:16 pm

Schrijvertje · Decorated Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 205 Location: Belgium

I guess Hope has been busy sending out replies. I got three!

First one is a reply to me sending her that Indian story about the Sun and her daughter.

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:23 am

Schrijvertje · Decorated Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 205 Location: Belgium

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:08 am

fizzcharlson

Hi guys

Received a message from DJ today. I had been wondering if he was simply a device for pointing us in the right direction when we couldn't find Hendler's blog and this email at least seems to confirm that he isn't going to supply us with any information. It is the second such reply I have had from him so I think I might give the poor chap a break. Still determined to uncover some more about the mysterious 'M' but am planning to do so in a less blatant way.

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:01 pm

agentgr33n · Unfettered Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 574

time

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:11 pm

fizzcharlson

Hi Mcgritts Laughing

I'm really in agreement with Schrijvertje on this one. For Hendler to have timed the videos in order to provide us with a clue he would have had to have authored them or at the very least searched through possibly hundreds to find one that matched exactly the number clue he wished to provide.
It's not to say I'm right but I have he strongest suspicion that this may prove to be a red herring.
Hey guys, Hendler has seen our entries. Oh the anticipation.

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:48 pm

Schrijvertje · Decorated Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 205 Location: Belgium

I think he's going for the bait.

I used the image Lachlan posted on his MySpace blog. Now Hendler wants to know where I found it.

Should I tell him the truth?

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:05 pm

fizzcharlson

Gosh yes Schrijvertje,
Finally a conversation rather than a series of comments. Here's your chance to enter into some dialogue with the good doc and maybe further our understanding of the mysterious Lachlan 'M' Murdoch. I'm so excited for you!
Good luck Very Happy

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:11 pm

Mokey Fraggle

**Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:12 pm