Author
Message
djsampson
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 393 Location: INDY
[META] Why Pretend? This post was a simple Question. Because I am not sure some of our actions are going to help! Why are a handful of players pretending to be pre-crash forum posters?
Now with that said, I know that one of us was invited into the Uber-secret layer. But, the more players jumping on that bandwagon, is drawing more attention to the fact that we can't be trusted. Some are more paranoid than others. But we need not give them any more reason to distrust us.
We already have our mole for as long as they allow them to be present. I don't think it is a good idea to push our trust boundary any further than it already is. Lets let our mole do their job. The rest of us need to work on gaining the trust of the Sentries. Just my opinion, but I don't want them to shut us completely off because we deceived them.
_________________I take your reality and substitute it with my own! -Mythbusters
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:54 pm
Bluefire
Decorated
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 181 Location: University of Florida
I have some feeling that a division may occur somewhere along the line in the story, and your introduction will decide which side you get 'put' on.
Besides, those of us pretending to be pre-crash (well, at least me) are willing to sacrifice the sentries' trust for us to improve their trust for you.
_________________Aka: Daniel C.
Maturity is a bitter disappointment for which no remedy exists, unless laughter can be said to remedy anything.
Now playing: Flynn Lives
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:00 pm
djsampson
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 393 Location: INDY
Good enough reasoning for me!
_________________I take your reality and substitute it with my own! -Mythbusters
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 7:54 pm
konamouse
Official uF Dietitian
Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 8010 Location: My own alternate reality
Yeah, I didn't understand that either. I recognized two nicks with join dates after the site was found, and both pretending to be pre-crash folks. Interesting choice to be made. I wonder how the PMs will handle it. Cause there is no way the player can know pre-crash stuff if push comes to shove.
I roleplay all the time in games (never admit to being married, younger than my real age, etc) but never beyond my knowledge base.
So, on that note: Hmmmm...which character should I try flirting with to get more information (since that is my usual MO)?
_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:02 pm
Rogi Ocnorb
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee
Joined: 01 Sep 2005 Posts: 4266 Location: Where the cheese is free.
I always wondered how you were going to explain making yourself the daughter of two characters, if the PM wanted to mess with you.
_________________
I'm telling you now, so you can't say, "Oh, I didn't know...Nobody told me!"
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:37 pm
Xestrix
Veteran
Joined: 09 Jun 2005 Posts: 101 Location: Salem, Oregon, USA
Just to make sure we're all on the same page, I never intended to portray myself as pre-crash. My post said "... this community that you've built ..."
Though I was addressed in an abiguous manner by Mkaos, so I responded in an equally ambiguos manner. I guess that turned out to mean that I was 'one of them' though that was never my intention. ^^;
In anycase, I'll continue doing all that I can given my current position.
_________________
--X'estrix
[Darkness Always Brings Light...]
Come Play With Us! - FlashFlashRevolution
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:43 pm
djsampson
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 393 Location: INDY
Xestrix wrote:
Just to make sure we're all on the same page, I never intended to portray myself as pre-crash. My post said "... this community that you've built ..."
Though I was addressed in an abiguous manner by Mkaos, so I responded in an equally ambiguos manner. I guess that turned out to mean that I was 'one of them' though that was never my intention. ^^;
In anycase, I'll continue doing all that I can given my current position.
Thanks Xestrix anyway! I do have to say there is a lot of detail in this. creating a sub forum and only inviting a few players into it to as one put it "copy and paste it to a secretive forum" The PMs have deffinetly gone above and beyond. This is almost to real. It has me still questioning the forum, even though I whoised both sites. Weird huh!
_________________I take your reality and substitute it with my own! -Mythbusters
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:48 pm
Xestrix
Veteran
Joined: 09 Jun 2005 Posts: 101 Location: Salem, Oregon, USA
I completely agree. The shear normality of this entire thing, and the depth of real-life personality these characters have makes it very easy to forget we're playing an ARG, even knowing the information we have, it still feels like this is all real. I love how smoothly put together all of this is!
_________________
--X'estrix
[Darkness Always Brings Light...]
Come Play With Us! - FlashFlashRevolution
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:07 pm
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 4033 Location: Here, obviously
Heh, that's actually something that's come up for me in other contexts -- it's really hard for PMs to clearly communicate to players when it's "safe" for them to do something like role-play being part of the in-game world (i.e. having background knowledge of it), or, say, writing about it, or in any way inserting themselves into the story in a way beyond the roles explicitly laid out for them.
I think if you want your players to feel they can do that, you have to communicate very clearly that you're not then going to undermine them.
So far I'm getting a lot of mixed signals.
_________________Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.
World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:11 pm
Lysithea
Unfettered
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 Posts: 468 Location: Australia
I thought that the PMs had essentially invited players to pretend to be pre-crash forum members.
link to complete blog post
Sentry Outpost Blog wrote:
As you can see from the overwhelming number of us who've bothered to return since the crash, we're in a situation where each Sentry has already proven themselves an important contributor. Maybe we'll be surprised and another fifty old sentries will show up next just having been too busy in January to re-register. But it's more likely that we'll be rebuilding from our smaller core group, where each of us is important.
_________________"Some people grow into their dreams instead of out of them." - Miles Vorkosigan
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 3:57 am
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 4033 Location: Here, obviously
Seems like, but Marie's pointed out that at least one of the people claiming to be a pre-crash Sentry has the same IP as a newcomer, which sounds like they're threatening us to call the bluff it seems like they seemed to invite us to make elsewhere.
_________________Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.
World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:25 am
aisforapple
Boot
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 24 Location: Palmdale, CA
I never meant to cause any trouble..
I simply was roleplaying as if I had been a precrash lurker... Only because on the site they stated that old members needed to re register... so I thought that was inviting the roleplay....
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:36 am
Phaedra
Lurker v2.0
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 Posts: 4033 Location: Here, obviously
aisforapple wrote:
I never meant to cause any trouble..
I simply was roleplaying as if I had been a precrash lurker... Only because on the site they stated that old members needed to re register... so I thought that was inviting the roleplay....
That's what it looked like to me, too.
You haven't caused any trouble! Congrats on getting into the secret forum.
I'm just not entirely sure what the PMs are trying to get us to do, here, but that's their responsibility to communicate clearly, not ours to discern...well...psychically.
_________________Voted Most Likely to Thread-Jack and Most Patient Explainer in the ILoveBees Awards.
World Champion: Cruel 2B Kind
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:48 am
danteIL
Unfictologist
Joined: 08 May 2006 Posts: 1990
Yes, well hindsight is 20/20, but I think the hints on the blog about this were ambiguous. From the April 13 post:
Quote:
So, please, if you're still checking in, take the time to register an account and say hi. We'd love to see you and hear what you've been up to the past few months! And, if you're just finding us for the first time, Welcome! You came at the perfect time! So hop on over to the wiki and learn a bit more about us and the pop on over to the forums and let us know a bit more about you and your interests and of any great news you've heard in the past few weeks.
They seem to be welcoming both old-timers and newcomers. Speaking for myself, I know that it seemed more straightforward to go ahead and join as a newcomer, because then I could just be 'myself' and wouldn't have to make up a story about where I've been for the past 6 months. But then they started to challenge the reasons for the influx of new people, so clearly that was the wrong way to go.
So I'm getting the same mixed signals...
Lysithea wrote:
I thought that the PMs had essentially invited players to pretend to be pre-crash forum members.
link to complete blog post
Sentry Outpost Blog wrote:
As you can see from the overwhelming number of us who've bothered to return since the crash, we're in a situation where each Sentry has already proven themselves an important contributor. Maybe we'll be surprised and another fifty old sentries will show up next just having been too busy in January to re-register. But it's more likely that we'll be rebuilding from our smaller core group, where each of us is important.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 am
EGo
Unfettered
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 545 Location: Wasting time in east New Jersey
They could be stalling and waiting for all the packages to arrive and come together.
_________________When I speak, I cross my fingers.
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:53 am
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending