Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Thu Nov 14, 2024 1:57 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
IMDB
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [9 Posts]  
Author Message
JookNy21
Decorated

Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 238
Location: Brooklyn New York

 		IMDB
Sequel in 2009?
http://www.canmag.com/nw/10361-cloverfield-sequel-imdb


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1180322/synopsis

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Saiyan King
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 599
Location: Orlando, The crappiest town in America, thanks to Disney

 		Re: IMDB
Sequel in 2009?
JookNy21 wrote:
http://www.canmag.com/nw/10361-cloverfield-sequel-imdb


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1180322/synopsis


Yea, cause we know how reliable IMDB always is ( Sarcasm). they had some of the names of the actors wrong up until a few weeks before the movie came out

EDIT , not to say that they might be right, i just wanna see it somewhere reliable first
_________________
Nobody kills Kakkarot while im around, destiny has reserved that pleasure for me

The funniest stories always end with "and thats the last time i ever did acid"

Im sorry, I can't loan you $20, Im saving it for Slenderman

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
OliMango
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 1189
Location: Vegas

 		Actually, IMDb is normally right when it comes to things like this (and I really hate to say that).
_________________
http://handyreviews.blogspot.com/
http://www.faroveryonder.info/

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:58 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069
OliMango wrote:
Actually, IMDb is normally right when it comes to things like this (and I really hate to say that).


Kinda like they are w/ the movie "Halo."

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
OliMango
Entrenched


Joined: 07 Oct 2007
Posts: 1189
Location: Vegas
xboyonfirex wrote:
OliMango wrote:
Actually, IMDb is normally right when it comes to things like this (and I really hate to say that).


Kinda like they are w/ the movie "Halo."


What is inconsitent about their entry on Halo?

The only reason it is out of date and misformed is because the producers have been crap with keeping people informaed about it.
_________________
http://handyreviews.blogspot.com/
http://www.faroveryonder.info/

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:38 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chump Force 1
Decorated


Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 286
Location: Next in line after 'Client 9'

 		Its just a placeholder...it means nothing. Read the first article ( http://www.canmag.com/nw/10361-cloverfield-sequel-imdb )...IMDB is doing this in the event there is a sequel, nothing is confirmed.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
anonimous
Veteran


Joined: 23 Jan 2008
Posts: 107
OliMango wrote:
xboyonfirex wrote:
OliMango wrote:
Actually, IMDb is normally right when it comes to things like this (and I really hate to say that).


Kinda like they are w/ the movie "Halo."


What is inconsitent about their entry on Halo?

The only reason it is out of date and misformed is because the producers have been crap with keeping people informaed about it.


And the project is officially dead.
_________________
In 2008, war was beginning...
http://partyvan.info/index.php/Project_Chanology

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
kwotto
Veteran


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Location: So-Cal, California
Quote:
The content of this page was created directly by users and has not been screened or verified by IMDb staff.


PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Mr. GrumpyPantz
Decorated


Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 253
anonimous wrote:
OliMango wrote:
xboyonfirex wrote:
OliMango wrote:
Actually, IMDb is normally right when it comes to things like this (and I really hate to say that).


Kinda like they are w/ the movie "Halo."


What is inconsitent about their entry on Halo?

The only reason it is out of date and misformed is because the producers have been crap with keeping people informaed about it.


And the project is officially dead.
It's not officially dead. the cant find a studio for it since Fox left them. its not coming out in 2009 though.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:55 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [9 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group