unforum

[LordC]

Formula image

[carbonize]

I concur that it looks like this is just part of a larger image/equation. I think the half line on the right is meant to indicate this.

As also been suggested perhaps we are to find the image this was taken from. Or possibly not. At present this ARG doesn't really make much sense.

[violentvixen]

[quote="Transtar"]

[violentvixen]

So e has a dash next to it, which implies that the rest of the equation shows that e will be to the negative power.

Isn't that really unusual?

Also, I feel like e^i(pi)= -1 figures here. I'm going to play with this some more.

Edit: Never mind, pondrthis covered all this already.

Edit: Does anyone know Schrodinger's equation well? I don't have time to do that many derivations, but I feel like you could fit this into that too... and the idea of the flood being so questionable would make the equation a nice candidate too.

But then again, I just like playing with equations so I'm probably stretching.

[Transtar]

the thon about quantium stuff is alot of times they drop/add a negative sign so that you can be describing positive or negative probability...or somethinig like that.(been a while)

The closest thing I got was Schrodingers equation for a 1d particle with free propagation which can be found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_in_a_box#Free_propagation

But knowing the story i find it more likely that it will be a deravation of a particle in a ring than a particle in a box (working on the theory now)

[Zatara_]

I'm no math expert, but one thing I have noticed is that this isn't the first time 108 has shown up:
http://www.bungie.net/News/content.aspx?type=topnews&cid=12653

Is it possible that the numbers and/or letters in the close-up image, could be used as a cypher to figure out the rest of the image?

[weephun]

[kulpdogg]

[Dunia]

[goofyrebel]

OT- i gotta agree with dunia, whoop dee doo ur in ur 3rd year of engineering. the first two years are primarily all basic college classes so ur still on par with everyone else whose been to college (i kno cuz ur not the only engineering student, cuz i'm in my final year, does that make me better than u???, hooray for me) and using my "engineering skills" i'm gonna deduce that ur a chemical engineer from that H2SO4 joke, considerin its an old joke from high school chem. so until u got a degree in physics (which seems more likely to be related in this puzzle) dont try to act like ur at the top of the pyramid

back to the SPEC- as for now, we have no way of knowing that the e is euler's number until we have that missing exponent, so y not work with wut we have until the exponent is possibly located instead of making things more complicated by assuming that their complicated....for the peeps that think their high and mighty, here's another lil college joke. KISS....Keep It Simple Stupid, start easy then work ur way up to the complex when necessary...silly 3rd years....

[Transtar]

[goofyrebel]

OT - haha, cant argue there Tran...ChE here too! but my point wuznt that he doesnt have a leg to stand on, its that he's not as high up as he boasts, especially considerin the majority of the material he wrote in wuz already posted on the previous page. and the ChE courses i took is how i knew that info

SPEC - and i can believe the e is the euller's number, but we can't work it unless we have the exponent so theres no point in workin an equation if its unworkable...so till we can work it with eullers number, my preference is to attempt workin it with somethin that is workable

QUESTION - can you double check and clarify for us ur equation in ur last post

[goofyrebel]

SPEC - as to the complete formula....I MITE have a lead....if u look at the pic it looks just like the wall that the artifacts are rotating in so i compared objects and found a similar spot....Server One in the bottom left corner just before it gets black matches the pic with the formula perfectly....my initial reference point is the circle with a whole in the center (donut) and then from there the shape of the objects around it, so if neone can view it and analyze the picture better to see if there is writing on the wall we mite have our exponent[/b]

[carbonize]

Somebody either email Ronald Mallett or go and see him at Connecticut University since he is the worlds foremost authority on time travel. Hell he claims to have come up with a way of doing it using nothing more than circulating beams of light.

[The Burning Fool]

Just a thought: 801 can be read as a 8/01. Could that mean something is gonna happen on August 1st? Maybe a new clue?