unforum

[Ziz]

[Steve_NY]

the Day After Tomorrow poster is really inaccurate. The arm holding the torch faces Staten Island where as in this poster, its on the side of Manhattan.

[engdude]

[SisBear]

[Nick Punishment]

i cant read through 8 pages. im just going to state (and hopefully this makes sense):

*theory*

the photo of Monstrous was taken at the ComicCon

possibly by marketing to release it online or an employee that too a quick shot so he didnt get in huge trouble.

he made up the frank and sons story so he wouldnt get questioned.

its weird that people know this is HUGELY important to thousands of people and can sell the poster online for hundreds of dollars, yet, no one shells out $15??

[ThunderMonkey]

The Leviathan and Behemoth are both described in Job, but the context is all wrong. Job was giving admiration for these creatures and neither one was on the path to destroy anything. Although, Job does note the creatures do some damage, but not with a malicious intent.

It should be interesting to note that the Leviathan is a water-borne creature that does indeed breath fire. The description in Job of Leviathan can be that of a dragon. The Behemoth could be reconstructed as a woolly mamoth.

However, this doesn't preclude any of the filmmakers from taking creative liberties with these creatures.

I would like to know where you got Ziz from. I'm not familiar with in the the Christian text of the Bible.

[honey_dear]

[SisBear]

But what about Kristin over at:

http://cloverfieldparasite.blogspot.com/2007/07/higher-res-monstrous-poster-images.html ?

She says that she took pictures herself at Frank & Sons. The vendor at Frank & Sons could be a "plant" by J.J. Abrams, though. That would make sense to me, because that's the only place that we've seen this poster so far.

[engdude]

yeah the fact that no one has posted that they bought one is bugging me too. Maybe people didnt wanna spend the money incase it was a fake? I would have bought it either way since it just looks so damn cool.

[honey_dear]

oh yeah

[Nerf Dianamo]

Actually, the most common thought I heard from people who'd seen it was that they were worried about legal implications of owning/buying a leaked poster. In this day and age, it would likely be seen as the same as bootlegged movies and illegally downloaded mp3s. And NO ONE should go to jail or have to pay fines for this game.

[konamouse]

1. Please use the [Search] function.
When people refuse to look before posting "I don't have time to read, I hope this hasn't been said before, etc" that just adds to the repeated posts that creates the extra long threads that discourages folks from reading them in the first place.
2. We encourage polite conversation. The TOS for uF specifically points out that flaming and personal attacks are not allowed. Asking someone to use the [Search] key is NOT attacking. It's facilitating.

Thank you.

[Ziz]

[engdude]

That's true Nerf, I hadn't though of that angle but if the RIAA can sue little kids and grandparents it isnt much of a stretch to imagine Paramount suing somebody for owning a leaked movie poster.

[Nighthawk]

I can't help but thing that, if this were a real deal available to the public, people would be bidding thousands for it on eBay already.

Also, and I figure this has been mentioned... where's the shoreline? Is it me or does it look like the water is basically at building level?