Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 8:35 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Red Monday -- new game?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 21 of 72 [1076 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, ..., 70, 71, 72  Next
Author Message
Degausser
Boot


Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 48
Location: The Static Cult

just as a curious sidenote, it looks to me like the symbol itself is a red herring, and if that's the case, then we've got an fascinatingly complete inversion of the traditional understanding of communication. in most cases, corruption is an extraneous element that obscures the message. in this case, however, the obvious message, the symbol, obscures the corruption that composes the actual message by diverting attention from it.

this doesn't really pertain that strongly to the game itself, it's just fascinating from a semiotic standpoint.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Nereus_Theophilus
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 456
Location: Canada

Ok so I finished researching Khan, and I hate to say this, I don't think he is our guy.

I say this because he was under house arrest till earlier this year and now he has a security detail watch his movements. This does not bode well to it being him.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:27 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
sapphira
Veteran


Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 78
Location: Rochester,NY

A.Q.?

http://www.cbc.ca/nuclearjihad/commentary.html -this website has an article about Abdul Quadeer Kahn and more.

Can A.Q. stand for Al Qaeda, which is a private terrorism org.?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:28 am
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Salsaman1991
Decorated


Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 214
Location: Uruguay (also known as "that little triangle in south america")

Re: A.Q.?

sapphira wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/nuclearjihad/commentary.html -this website has an article about Abdul Quadeer Kahn and more.

Can A.Q. stand for Al Qaeda, which is a private terrorism org.?


We all thought of Al Qaeda, but it's not reasonable. A.Q. is mentioned as a person, if I recall correctly. Plus, too obvious. We're looking into something less known to the common public. C'mon, admit it: nobody had ever heard of Kahn before Red Monday. I feel JC is going to keep bringing us special guests we've never heard of before.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:03 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Nereus_Theophilus
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 456
Location: Canada

Re: A.Q.?

Salsaman1991 wrote:
sapphira wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/nuclearjihad/commentary.html -this website has an article about Abdul Quadeer Kahn and more.

Can A.Q. stand for Al Qaeda, which is a private terrorism org.?


We all thought of Al Qaeda, but it's not reasonable. A.Q. is mentioned as a person, if I recall correctly. Plus, too obvious. We're looking into something less known to the common public. C'mon, admit it: nobody had ever heard of Kahn before Red Monday. I feel JC is going to keep bringing us special guests we've never heard of before.


Unfortunately, because of the family I grew up with and the air force background, I had heard about Khan, but never studied him as deeply as I have.

And as I said earlier, I do not believe that Khan is our man. JC is acting all weird, well more than normal... and Khan has been under house arrest till some time just after the new year. Once house arrest was over the Pakistan government set a security force to follow him. I am led to believe that this is true to as they do not want to anger the US and Canadian forces that are currently occupying there country.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:19 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Salsaman1991
Decorated


Joined: 16 Oct 2007
Posts: 214
Location: Uruguay (also known as "that little triangle in south america")

Re: A.Q.?

Nereus_Theophilus wrote:
Salsaman1991 wrote:
sapphira wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/nuclearjihad/commentary.html -this website has an article about Abdul Quadeer Kahn and more.

Can A.Q. stand for Al Qaeda, which is a private terrorism org.?


We all thought of Al Qaeda, but it's not reasonable. A.Q. is mentioned as a person, if I recall correctly. Plus, too obvious. We're looking into something less known to the common public. C'mon, admit it: nobody had ever heard of Kahn before Red Monday. I feel JC is going to keep bringing us special guests we've never heard of before.


Unfortunately, because of the family I grew up with and the air force background, I had heard about Khan, but never studied him as deeply as I have.

And as I said earlier, I do not believe that Khan is our man. JC is acting all weird, well more than normal... and Khan has been under house arrest till some time just after the new year. Once house arrest was over the Pakistan government set a security force to follow him. I am led to believe that this is true to as they do not want to anger the US and Canadian forces that are currently occupying there country.


In your case, it makes sense that you've heard of him before, however, I doubt it's the case for everyone in here.

What I meant is that it won't be as obvious as Al Qaeda, it'll be a group/individual of whom we've heard little. Dunno if I expresed myself correctly, but I hope you understand what I'm trying to say >_<

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:38 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Nereus_Theophilus
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 456
Location: Canada

Re: A.Q.?

Salsaman1991 wrote:
Nereus_Theophilus wrote:
Salsaman1991 wrote:
sapphira wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/nuclearjihad/commentary.html -this website has an article about Abdul Quadeer Kahn and more.

Can A.Q. stand for Al Qaeda, which is a private terrorism org.?


We all thought of Al Qaeda, but it's not reasonable. A.Q. is mentioned as a person, if I recall correctly. Plus, too obvious. We're looking into something less known to the common public. C'mon, admit it: nobody had ever heard of Kahn before Red Monday. I feel JC is going to keep bringing us special guests we've never heard of before.


Unfortunately, because of the family I grew up with and the air force background, I had heard about Khan, but never studied him as deeply as I have.

And as I said earlier, I do not believe that Khan is our man. JC is acting all weird, well more than normal... and Khan has been under house arrest till some time just after the new year. Once house arrest was over the Pakistan government set a security force to follow him. I am led to believe that this is true to as they do not want to anger the US and Canadian forces that are currently occupying there country.


In your case, it makes sense that you've heard of him before, however, I doubt it's the case for everyone in here.

What I meant is that it won't be as obvious as Al Qaeda, it'll be a group/individual of whom we've heard little. Dunno if I expresed myself correctly, but I hope you understand what I'm trying to say >_<


NO, I totally understand what you are saying. I think what I said there came out a bit wrong. I do agree with you, but because of my life... yadda yadda yadda. Rock On

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:14 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
JohnJimJoeBob
Boot

Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 56

With the lack of legal action that the Pakistani government has taken against Khan, the possibility of their knowledge of and participation in his actions prior to his public confession, and his immense popularity in his country, I'm tempted to believe that even if Khan did have a security detail following him, the Pakistani government would not prevent him from meeting with Khalid to discuss nuclear weaponry.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Nereus_Theophilus
Unfettered


Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 456
Location: Canada

JohnJimJoeBob wrote:
With the lack of legal action that the Pakistani government has taken against Khan, the possibility of their knowledge of and participation in his actions prior to his public confession, and his immense popularity in his country, I'm tempted to believe that even if Khan did have a security detail following him, the Pakistani government would not prevent him from meeting with Khalid to discuss nuclear weaponry.


That is a really good point. Actually it makes me think. We know the government in Pakistan has never really been on the ball with him and they do think of him as some kind of hero. A meeting with the "Prince", may just be a meeting between friends. They could talk and information like on who to give money to and where to pick up a war head... Ok so it may be him.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:46 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Cr0ybot
Veteran


Joined: 03 Oct 2007
Posts: 96
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

JohnJimJoeBob beat me to it; I was going to point out the same thing.

Though JC didn't quite phrase it so that A.Q. must be one guy.

Quote:
[He] has often been mentioned in reference to an "A.Q" (unknown). He recently came to our attention during a supposed meeting with a certain xxxxx xxx xxxxx at this location: [111100101010000100, 11001011110100101000000](24.8452, 66.78848). We don't know the reason for the meeting, but the location is unsettling.


Mentioning someone "in reference to" something else usually implies that that something else is some sort organization.

Anyone have any luck finding names that fix the x's? It's very likely that the "middle name" is "bin" since we're dealing people mainly in the middle-east.
_________________
"Robots are inhuman. Human robots are in."
~Marvin, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (Reasons to be Miserable)


PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


Cr0ybot wrote:
Anyone have any luck finding names that fix the x's? It's very likely that the "middle name" is "bin" since we're dealing people mainly in the middle-east.


xxxxx xxx xxxxx matches "Osama bin Laden" exactly. But that's possibly a bit too obvious.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:50 pm
 Back to top 
Kortheal
Boot

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 53

Osama Bin Laden, I doubt, would be meeting with ANYBODY at this time. The man is on Dialysis and mobility is a problem. To meet with the prince at those coordinates (Which were what, an abandoned nuclear power station in Pakistan?) would be far too strenuous for a man who has to go through treatment every few days. There's too big a price on his head for him to fly, and too far to travel for him to go by ground. Afganistan is land locked, so he couldn't SAIL to pakistan. Getting there is the problem for a 6'5" Afgani who is as I say again...on Dialysis. While it may be a perfect match to the X's and while I'm saying it's not impossible. I'm saying that there is too heavy a price on his head right now for him to be moving around in the open.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kortheal
Boot

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 53

Did a little digging on the Chasma Nuclear Power Plant in Pakistan, you know the one that A.Q. Khan helped with.

Turns out it's designed from a nuclear prototype bought from China, who was supplying Pakistan with materials to build and operate the reactors for five reloading stages. Odd thing is...it's rumored that since the '80's when the US put out that whole nuclear test ban that Pakistan had been developing nuclear weapons grade plutonium and uranium in their refining facilities (Which was funded by none other than China). The US put a trade embargo on Pakistan and eventually restricted all aid to Pakistan entirely. After a while Pakistan's nuclear program began to suffer because the government in charge at the time of the embargo pulled 60% of the nuclear research money JUST to appeal to the US.
Once the US lifted the embargo it seems that government changed hands between leading officials and the funding was returned, and this time it seemed that American investors seemed to even bid into the research program to win the contract for reactor designs.

...I dunno...but the whole Pakistan, China, Pakistan playing shady nuclear research stuff behind US backs is kinda fishy!

PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:31 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Darren Knight
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 494
Location: Parsippany, New Jersey

True True, Osama Bin Laden is pretty unlikly but a great guess. The nucleur power plant and China is a great lead seeing how this incident is linked to china somehow.

Could this be the link or is it something to do with 'red monday'?
Good thing we get our emails today.
_________________

Nicknames: ::Agent 101::
Playing: ::Institute for Human Continuity::

Completed: ::Red Monday::


PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:48 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Kortheal
Boot

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 53

Red Monday has MANY links in this...

Red Monday was a court case dealing with the end of the Mcarthyist Communist Witch Hunts way back in the 50's

China is a communist country
China's military is the RED army

What the "monday" part has to do with anything...I dunno

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:46 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 21 of 72 [1076 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, ..., 70, 71, 72  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group