Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:53 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[HOAX] WaPo Cloverfield Review = not so good
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 4 [51 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
Superfuzzzz
Account Disabled

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 339

[HOAX] WaPo Cloverfield Review = not so good

Washington Post claims the movie is to chaotic to see whats going on in every scene.

"The monster's roar got our attention, but my focus was lost from the migraine I got trying to stay with the POV style filming. There is no remorse for the main characters because the audience never gets to know them. So when it all comes to a destructive and confusing end.....well you'll see on 1-18-08.
With the buzz this movie has created, the aspirin companies will reap the benefits as well as Bad Robot."

Hmm?


Edit: Tagged Retagged and clarified. -SpaceBass

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Patrick Star
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 409
Location: Oregon

Re: Cloverfield Review = not so good

Superfuzzzz wrote:
Washington Post claims the movie is to chaotic to see whats going on in every scene.

"The monster's roar got our attention, but my focus was lost from the migraine I got trying to stay with the POV style filming. There is no remorse for the main characters because the audience never gets to know them. So when it all comes to a destructive and confusing end.....well you'll see on 1-18-08.
With the buzz this movie has created, the aspirin companies will reap the benefits as well as Bad Robot."

Hmm?


You got a link with those fries?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:03 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Ivo
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Location: Illinois, USA

Where is this review, I couldn't find it on the Post's website. Link please?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:05 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Superfuzzzz
Account Disabled

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 339

Archive both days of last weekend. It was either Sat or Sun
My brother cut it out of the paper so If I find a scanner I'll put the pic of it up.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ivo
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Location: Illinois, USA

Superfuzzzz wrote:
Archive both days of last weekend. It was either Sat or Sun
My brother cut it out of the paper so If I find a scanner I'll put the pic of it up.


The WP gives access to its archives for free for up to 60 days. A search of the site on the term "Cloverfield" doesn't reveal a single hit, same with a Google News search, regular search, archive search and site specific searches. Are you making this up?

EDIT: The WP ran a Reuters story in its November 8 edition about JJ Abrams' new Star Trek project: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071109/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_startrek

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:20 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
gijig21
Boot

Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 60

I think for those of us that are following along and gettingto know the characters will enjoy the experience more then those who don't.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mhovis
Veteran

Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 113
Location: Canyon Country, CA

Quote:
Washington Post claims the movie is to chaotic to see whats going on in every scene.


What better excuse could there be to watch it multiple times, "Honey, I had to watch it 6 times, so as not to miss anything."

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Superfuzzzz
Account Disabled

Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 339

It was either Sat or Sun. I'd swear it was the Washington Post.
The review title was called something like Clovertigo:a hand-held nightmare

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:36 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ivo
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Location: Illinois, USA

Superfuzzzz wrote:
It was either Sat or Sun. I'd swear it was the Washington Post.
The review title was called something like Clovertigo:a hand-held nightmare


Link please? Because I cannot find it.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:37 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 4751
Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth

Quote:
There is no remorse for the main characters because the audience never gets to know them.


Well... *WE* know them quite well!

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:43 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
CloverfieldClues.com
Entrenched


Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 757

Superfuzzzz wrote:
It was either Sat or Sun. I'd swear it was the Washington Post.
The review title was called something like Clovertigo:a hand-held nightmare


Did you read it online? Or in an actual newspaper?

If you read it online, press CTRL-H to check your "history", and you should be able to find the link. If you are using Firefox, you can even search your history.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
jon-561
Boot


Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 50

Superfuzzzz wrote:
It was either Sat or Sun. I'd swear it was the Washington Post.
The review title was called something like Clovertigo:a hand-held nightmare


Hey fuzzzz, was this your post also from the prestigious 1-18news?

http://1-18-08news.com/newest-info-on-upcoming-trailer-and-title

Superfuzzzz — November 5, 2007 @ 4:11 pm

New info that the movie is called "CHUAI"
After the drilling station.
The monster is named after the drilling area that it came from.

I will give you my source.
His name is Guillermo Villalobos and he works on a studio lot as a sound tech.
Guess which studio company?
He cut a demo for my band 2 years ago and we have kept in touch since.
He was working with another sound tech that worked on "Chuai"
Since the title isn't the main secrecy issue as much as the movie, he said if I wanted to leak it he didn't care.
He is not under a gag order so he said he could care less.
Now he thinks this will make him famous.
If anyone needs a sound engineer for a studio he would like me to refer him.

I asked about a conspiracy theory and he said from what he understood the
drilling station is attacked and the attack is referred to vaguely as the "Chuai Station Incident"
When its learned what happened, they simply describe what they know is an "aggressive unknown living organism" as "Chuai" It isn't clear where its heading until it nears the east coast and appears on sonar or radar.

So I think its kept hush until New York City gets a visit.
Evidently there is a time lapse of a 3 to 7 days before the mosnter reaches NYC. And a Possibility that it attacks large ships in its path on its way to land. Which would explain why it didnt care for the Statue of Liberty.

Evidently Robby Hawkins gets word of what happened through a friend in the company (Teddy Hanssen is my guess) which to me explains why he seems not as shocked as everyone else at the party.

Thats all Im gonna get. More than I thought though.

Just an FYI: Ive known this guy for a few years and for the most part, I believe what he tells me. Although I wouldn't trust him alone with anyone's girlfriend. His word is usually good.
I told him that I would give his home address to this board if its not true.


PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:01 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
InAFieldofClover
Unfettered

Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 375

If that's real, the Post needs to hire better writers because that was one of the worst written 'reviews' I've ever read.

Then again, it also screams "fake" so better luck next time. FYI: Movie reviews in major newspapers don't run until the weekend preceding the release, and in some cases the weekend it actually comes out. Given this traditional style of journalism, why would there be a review over a month before the movie comes out?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:07 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
matt_ethec
Boot

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 55

Sounds like a member of H.A.M.M.E.R. Strike to me.
(Handheld Action and Motion Movies Eradication and Resistence)

I mean really. I can see an average filmgoer getting hung up on that, but a pro film critic. No.

Well OK, I can see a film critic thinking he can get hung up on that. But one of those would write a lot more about it.

You sure it wasn't an editorial? Or completely fabricated by you?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chrizzy
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 611
Location: Halifax, NS

For me, I don't really care what the review says, or whether the review is real or not. Regardless, I'll be going to see the movie for myself to form my own opinion. I've never relied on critics' reviews before and I don't plan on starting with this movie.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 4 [51 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group