Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 11:47 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[META] PLEASE, do not hack!
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 4 [53 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
Dr. Awkward
Unfettered


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 374
Location: Marunouchi - Tokyo, Japan

Re: If I only new then,
what I know now...

Euchre wrote:
Dr. Awkward wrote:
Euchre wrote:
Dr. Awkward wrote:
How else does progression occur.

Why not ask Mr Toasty, Nenya...
Wink


Actually, I have Very Happy (outside the threads)

Very intelligent and willing to guide as opposed to judge... Cool

I tried to guide you discreetly, but you stopped answering. Oh well.


Yes, you did try to "guide" me discreetly Euchre...
whether or not your "guidance" could be construed as constructive,
I presume, would be subjective to opinion.

We are, after all, having this discussion... Wink

I'd be obliged to post the pm you sent me, unedited, if you feel it would somehow clafiy your perspective (regarding "hacking") or
vindicate your intentions to the other forum members.


* Edit...For the record, I will only share or post a pm publicly w/ the senders nod or request...otherwise I simply refuse.
_________________
.don I ,nem eniN ?terpretni nem enin oD
Launch Randomousity Chat ...
Do nine men interpret? Nine men, I nod.


PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:45 pm
Last edited by Dr. Awkward on Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

Quote:
He's gone farther than any other movie ever before with the extensive viral ad campaign.


The Beast, the orginal ARG, was a promotion for the movie AI. I think that was a totally different experience than this viral ad campaign, so I would put them in different classes.

The questions raised here are interesting. The thing is the design of this promotion doesn't fit a model of "solve this puzzle to open this password." So how people are supposed to "know" what to do in following this promotion, is pretty random.

For other discussions on this topic you might like:

this meta thread on brute forcing

a puppetmaster guide question on hacking

Nighthawk from the post following this one:
Quote:
Let me restate a theory of mine: we have no concrete proof, none whatsoever, that "paramount" was the password since the beginning. Can you safely say that someone didn't change it TO "paramount" once the site was first compromised?


Fair point and I missed it before. I think security is up to them..wouldn't they know that the site was under a bruteforce attack? If they didn't know, I would expect that photobucket looks for those kinds of attacks against its users.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:51 pm
Last edited by rose on Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:40 pm; edited 2 times in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 4751
Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth

Quote:
Our friendly neighborhood puppetmasters used some stupid passwords....


Let me restate a theory of mine: we have no concrete proof, none whatsoever, that "paramount" was the password since the beginning. Can you safely say that someone didn't change it TO "paramount" once the site was first compromised?

Even so, somebody got the password, "paramount" or not, which is a big failure on their part. I was a network admin for a 200+ user network as well as the entire corporate infrastructure for my employer in the Southeastern United States. My personal passwords may be week, but the corporate passwords were literally no less than 30 characters and included letters, numbers AND symbols.

The fact that they didn't use passwords like that on a site the was a target (it was a target since it was discovered, and I even remember seeing posts of people here suggesting to hack it) is inexcusable.

Also, it wouldn't be surprised that, if one site was compromised, they all were. I can't imagine them having a list of thirty passwords they use, so I imagine they had one password for everything. That too is arguably inexcusable; in the environment I described above I had SIXTEEN of the 30 character passwords I describe.

But that doesn't make any of this right. Like someone else said, the password could have been "password"; "...they deserved to get hacked" is NOT a justification...

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

How did we conclude that we weren't supposed to hack it? Maybe they wanted us to use it to post some images. Wink I think we decided that it shouldn't have been hacked when we realized that there wasn't anything new to be found there?

The point isn't really that they "deserved" to be hacked or that they made it too easy to hack. The point is that the players are trying to figure out what to do because the promotion is all over the place and not giving clear boundaries or directions. How can anyone say for sure that one site is to be hacked and another one isn't? We don't know the answer to that question without trying it, only the designers do.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:10 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 4751
Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth

See my post in poll thread. Don't want to repeat things.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:12 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
skullpanda
Boot


Joined: 06 Jun 2007
Posts: 48
Location: Avalon

I don't agree or disagree with anything yet. But I was wondering when it actually becomes hacking. Don't a lot of args require you to guess passwords?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:18 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

rose wrote:
How did we conclude that we weren't supposed to hack it? Maybe they wanted us to use it to post some images. Wink I think we decided that it shouldn't have been hacked when we realized that there wasn't anything new to be found there?


Yeah, and don't forget: when that PB account was first located (waaaay back in the beginning, when the myspace pages first went up), there was NO password at all - it was wide open. The photos could be viewed by anyone, and they were just the same photos as on Jamie's myspace. Then, a password went up, and people just left it alone. Why these PM's can't get their act together BEFORE they give us the key clue that will let us find something new is something of a mystery.

Also, the fact that the password was "paramount" probably just means they didn't care whether people 'hacked' it or not - it contained nothing sensitive. In the light of day, this whole thing seems fairly inconsequential.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Eddy
Decorated


Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 194

Well, didn't read this entire thread, so this is really just a response to the top post. As someone who has hosted/produced games in the past, nothing was against the rules. This rule (that there are none) is a simple concession that any designer quickly comes to terms with when designing for this medium (the internet). The few times a player has taken advantage of my errors, they earned kudos. You see, it's a game to everyone, even those who are trying to control it. So relax. Your attitude should be that if the producers become upset because someone got the better of them (i.e. they got beat), then those producers are in the wrong line of work. They're either at match for us, or they're not. The idea that we should hold back, practice restraint or even help them to recover their fumbles is insulting to everyone.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:08 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 03 Aug 2004
Posts: 4310
Location: Des Moines, IA

People bringing JamieAndTeddy.com into the argument got me thinking a bit. Here are just a couple quick questions to ponder, not meant as an argument for or against anything.

1.) Were we really meant to hack the password at JamieAndTeddy.com? It's possible that we brute forced our way in before the PMs could give us a concrete clue that would lead to the password. It was literally two hours from the site being found to the password discovery.

2.) Did we actually brute force the password to JamieAndTeddy.com in the first place? The password was posted by a killroy - posted this one thing and hasn't posted since. It would violate ToS here, but as others have noted in the past there is nothing saying the PMs wouldn't do it. Heck, how many posters here have even taken the time to read anything in the Welcome! box on every page? Anyway, I'll admit that this part is unlikely.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Eddy
Decorated


Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 194

I'd say Kilroy is a producer helping and encouraging us a bit. And for sure they read this forum. Anyone paying attention long enough eventually finds this place and this place puts all other 1-18-08 sites to shame (once you get used to navigating it)--and as a consequence is the best place to gauge and recalibrate their assumptions about the acuity of the audience.

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:30 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
SlushoLover
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 97

All of you condoning or blowing it off don't get it. If they put up a website and put a weak password on it, that's one thing. But you need to tell what information could be gleaned from hacking a character's MySpace. Or even the Photobucket account.

The only reason to do so would be to maliciously alter the game. Which was accomplished. Pics were uploaded and deleted, which affects those who find the PB and MS pages because content had been erased. Once something occurs where the players gain control over content the game is potentially broken. I think that upsets people more than anything.

We'll see what happens! It surely was an exciting night, I must say. Hope we get to continue on.

EDIT: @ MrToasty: Got a little excited at first thinking, "kilroy... wasn't that where the profane lascano post came from??" ... then I realized that it must be a title for first posters. Several are "kilroy".

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:31 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Eddy
Decorated


Joined: 05 Sep 2007
Posts: 194

Quote:
SlushoLover
The only reason to do so would be to maliciously alter the game.


Simply not true.

Again, but IOW, if someone can show me the rule book, I'll back off. Otherwise, try board games if you find the idea of no rules upsetting or unsettling.

[/quote]

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:41 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Hurm
Boot

Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 39

So, um... I've been lurking around these boards for a few months now, and I've been pretty caught up on all of the news, but I've not heard about this yet. Somebody hacked a photobucket of one of the characters? When did this happen? Could someone explain or link to something that explains this in detail please?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

Quote:
if someone can show me the rule book, I'll back off.


No rule book. People have opinions on what they personally would do, or what they think everyone should do, but there are no rules in this promotion.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:33 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
SlushoLover
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 97

Eddy wrote:
Again, but IOW, if someone can show me the rule book, I'll back off. Otherwise, try board games if you find the idea of no rules upsetting or unsettling.


Of course I can't show you a rule book when there is none. But can you please tell me what you could gain by hacking into a MySpace account of an in-game character?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 4 [53 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group