Author
Message
Ryomi
Decorated
Joined: 25 Aug 2007 Posts: 150
[OOG]0-00-00.com Don't know if this has been brought up or not, i looked and looked but to no avail...
0-00-00.com
same pics minus crazy japanesse guy and also the time stamps are gone.
edit to add tag ~rose
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:20 pm
NYC5
Unfettered
Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 418 Location: New York City
Eh, seems like a crappier remake...
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 4:23 pm
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
Have you guys considered that they're changed the release date and this is a back-pedal they hope to make look intentional?
Look closely at those pictures, they haven't been photoshopped.
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:33 pm
clemgrad2001
Boot
Joined: 25 Jul 2007 Posts: 41
I see the japanese guy....is it just me?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:35 pm
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
It's not just you...
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:40 pm
pegassissy
Unfettered
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 552
Whois Domain Name: 0-00-00.com
Registrant Contact:
0-00-00.com Private Registrant 0-00-00.comSPLAT proxy.dreamhost.com
DreamHost Web Hosting
417 Associated Rd #324
Brea, CA 92821
US
+1.2139471032
Administrative Contact:
0-00-00.com Private Registrant 0-00-00.comSPLAT proxy.dreamhost.com
DreamHost Web Hosting
417 Associated Rd #324
Brea, CA 92821
US
+1.2139471032
Technical Contact:
0-00-00.com Private Registrant 0-00-00.comSPLAT proxy.dreamhost.com
DreamHost Web Hosting
417 Associated Rd #324
Brea, CA 92821
US
+1.2139471032
Billing Contact:
0-00-00.com Private Registrant 0-00-00.comSPLAT proxy.dreamhost.com
DreamHost Web Hosting
417 Associated Rd #324
Brea, CA 92821
US
+1.2139471032
Record created on 2007-09-27 16:53:54 .
Record expires on 2008-09-27 16:53:54.
_________________And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:49 pm
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
And that means what?
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:52 pm
pegassissy
Unfettered
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 552
Means its most likly 99% oog because of the date it was registered on August 27th, or something like that. Meaning someone created this after the trailer and whatnot was released
_________________And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:09 pm
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
refer to my original text:
"Have you guys considered that they're changed the release date and this is a back-pedal they hope to make look intentional?
Look closely at those pictures, they haven't been photoshopped."
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 8:19 pm
Evil
Veteran
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 83 Location: Behind picture #6
nice try
LeithNoweder wrote:
refer to my original text:
"Have you guys considered that they're changed the release date and this is a back-pedal they hope to make look intentional?
Look closely at those pictures, they haven't been photoshopped."
Looks like a gamejack. The flash files for both 1-18-08.com and slusho.jp have been completely decompiled several times. It's child's play to recreate the sites when you can simply download the components. If they were truly related, the pictures would have updated simultaneously, not after it was mentioned that the new pic was missing. Plus, what date would 0-00-00 refer to?
_________________"Perception is virtual, not reality" -- Evil, 2007
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:04 am
keeno_82uk
Unfettered
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 Posts: 375 Location: UK
yeah probably a fan made site made from the original decompiled site.
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:12 am
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342
I did a comparison and I challenge you to do the same yourself, if you have the tools to do it.
I took screenshots of the first pic as shown on each site, zoomed in to 708% where you can see the actual pixels in each image. They are not the exact same renderings for sure. A common way to spot an edit, even a VERY careful one (as these appear to be) is that the editor fails to set the image editor (if it even has the option) not to reinterpret all the pixels in the image. the result is a grid of pixels that doesn't match the original. I also overlayed the two images as layers, and a few of the numbers on the 1-18-08.com image appear to have artifacts in the 0-00-00.com image. You can compare this by putting the 1-18-08 image as top layer and slide the opacity up and down between about 5% and 0%.
What set me into this research was the comment by LeithNoweder:
Quote:
Look closely at those pictures, they haven't been photoshopped.
When I did so, I immediately noticed the lack of the border on the 0-00-00 images. When I pulled up pic_1.swf on both, I noticed the brightness is also not the same. They almost appeared to be different color depths, but on my Mac it's apparent they aren't.
Being the enterprising person I am, I did in fact load both images from the respective flashes into Photoshop itself. Neither has Exif data, and they are both the same DPI. When you look at them both zoomed in enough to see the pixels, you'll see a cubic pattern of pixels creating a sort of 'grid'. That pattern is what should match anywhere but where the timestamps have been placed on the images. Speaking of which, based on the way the font has been rasterized into the images, I'd say they are absolutely added later. I figured they would have just set the date on the camera wrong, but it would appear they did not. Maybe they were worried about the Exif data not matching but they were smart enough to leave that out.
Description
Filesize
334.69KB
Viewed
155 Time(s)
Description
Filesize
306.47KB
Viewed
154 Time(s)
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:47 am
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
So you're saying it isn't legit?
Why would someone go through the work of creating the site? what would they have to gain?
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:15 am
m0r1arty
Unfettered
Joined: 08 Aug 2007 Posts: 337
LeithNoweder wrote:
Why would someone go through the work of creating the site? what would they have to gain?
You tell us?
-m0r
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:23 am
LeithNoweder
Unfettered
Joined: 03 Oct 2007 Posts: 429
I didn't make it...
Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:05 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending