Author
Message
Bruce
Unfettered
NY1 has a website. I searched for 1-18-08-related terms. No hits on most. I got one for 'Rob Hawkins':
New York 1 search
edit made url tiny ~rose
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:02 pm
Drone41279
Boot
Aye agreed we are still missing on some of the clues in the trailer I think.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rgs/monst-table.html which is an Edger Burroughs tale about a scientific frankenstinian approach to super humans, but not finished reading it yet to know if there are any clues there.
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:20 pm
dalphx
Entrenched
maybe thats why that havent provided anything new, they feel we still have stuff to work with?
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:23 pm
john locke
Decorated
Possibly the heat in january could tie to the off shore drilling as it was mentioned on another thread that it could breach a tectonic plate or even the mantle! (they did say on the tagruato site they were going deeper than ever before into the mid atlantic ridge) just a thought!
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:32 pm
dalphx
Entrenched
john locke wrote:
Possibly the heat in january could tie to the off shore drilling as it was mentioned on another thread that it could breach a tectonic plate or even the mantle! (they did say on the tagruato site they were going deeper than ever before into the mid atlantic ridge) just a thought!
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:34 pm
brettoniasam
Unfettered
Re: Trailer Clues Revisited We need to figure out what all those meant on the trailer...
Matt Dark wrote:
We had the ABZ3293.com thing, obviously that was a jack, but they did put a lot of focus on that in the trailer, he wanted us to see it, like a lot of things, it's where we got slusho! so there's got to be more! ok so what do we have?
And they act like it's perfectly normal.
It's not January 18, 2008. But the timestamps on the 1-18-08 photos come into question. Maybe those aren't TIMEstamps at all....but seems unlikely.
It's all in somebody's head. I still keep coming back to the theory that this is an alternate/multiple reality sci-fi story....that what we're seeing isn't "real" -- it's part of some virtual reality, or inside someone's head, possibly "inserted" by the DSI's weird side effects. If so, the DSI might be skewing that person's (Rob? Jamie? Hud?) sense of reality, so that little things don't make sense -- like 1/18/08 seeming like a warm night in spring, or the "Slusho 7" seem to look different in every frame....
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:12 pm
Chump Force 1
Decorated
Re: Trailer Clues Revisited We need to figure out what all those meant on the trailer...
brettoniasam wrote:
My theories about 63 degrees:
It's not January 18, 2008. But the timestamps on the 1-18-08 photos come into question. Maybe those aren't TIMEstamps at all....but seems unlikely.
It's all in somebody's head. I still keep coming back to the theory that this is an alternate/multiple reality sci-fi story....that what we're seeing isn't "real" -- it's part of some virtual reality, or inside someone's head, possibly "inserted" by the DSI's weird side effects. If so, the DSI might be skewing that person's (Rob? Jamie? Hud?) sense of reality, so that little things don't make sense -- like 1/18/08 seeming like a warm night in spring, or the "Slusho 7" seem to look different in every frame....
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:31 pm
smartmart
Unfettered
dalphx wrote:
john locke wrote:
Possibly the heat in january could tie to the off shore drilling as it was mentioned on another thread that it could breach a tectonic plate or even the mantle! (they did say on the tagruato site they were going deeper than ever before into the mid atlantic ridge) just a thought!
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:07 pm
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Could somebody show Bruce how to use tinyurl?
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:10 pm
Anteros
Unfettered
Two opinions My opinions First:
_________________.
Beware of Geeks bearing Gifs.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:39 am
W-Three
Unfettered
The only thing is that everything is leading up to the movie in real time. I think the movie would be set in January, any earlier and the ARG would be off, as it gives actual dates. Any later and there would be a gap. Not to mention, being the type of movie it is, it would work best being released on the same day its set.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:23 am
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Re: Two opinions My opinions
Anteros wrote:
First:
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:29 am
Red Walrus
Unfettered
The unseasonably warm weather may be part of the plot , all the different mentions of keeping the dsi freezing seems to fit in. Jamies' "hotness" may be someething related too, why all the mentions of it and then choosing Hotprofilesplus as her myspace templates.(please do not understand--not that she makes the ny temp hot, just that it seems to be emphasized)
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:37 am
Kraker
Unfettered
Re: Two opinions My opinions
Anteros wrote:
First:
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:42 am
Dr. Awkward
Unfettered
63 degrees in NYC in January isn't unheard of... At all actually... I've spent a substantial amount of time in NY...I'd assign the temperature
Doesn't even seem like the characters are taken aback by the
they were enjoying in the teaser. No
all the while the
this link from '98...about tens years of global warming follows this article headlined,
Forget Bermuda! Try Binghamton, N.Y., which hit a balmy 63-degree temperature in January (News from the northeast regional climate center)".
_________________
.don I ,nem eniN ?terpretni nem enin oD
Launch Randomousity Chat Do nine men interpret? Nine men, I nod.
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:37 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending
FAQ
Search
Calendar