unforum

[Status]

The phrase that strikes me is "area formerly know as Central Park", almost as if this is an investigation of past events.

[konamouse]

My 2 cents: The government classified the case "Cloverfield". Or was it the video found is classifed "Cloverfield". Maybe the camera was found in a field of clover? Or maybe that name was etched on the side of the camera or on the video tape cassette?

Won't really know until the movie is shown, I suspect.

[Dr. Awkward]

[Awhite2490]

I haven't viewed this "trailer" yet (waiting for an official version before taunting myself), but I'd like to point something out.

MULTIPLE SIGHTINGS OF CASE DESIGNATED "CLOVERFIELD"
.......CAMERA RETRIEVED AT INCIDENT SITE U.S. 447
..........AREA FORMERLY KNOWN AS "CENTRAL PARK"

Multiple sightings of Cloverfield? That tells me that is NOT the code name for Central Park, but for the monster.
Or..if we want to go back to some other theories..."case" could refer to a sort of..epidemic or disease...so if there are "multiple sightings of case designated Cloverfield", then it could mean that they've seen many people "infected" by the monster who have transformed. But that's all spec. I think it's more likely that it's intended to refer to the monster.

Code name for Central Park would be Incident Site U.S. 447.
Also, if they're up to "incident site U.S. 447" that suggest many things to me.
A. This is a world wide situation, or U.S. wouldn't be specified
B. 447th site? This clearly occurs outside of New York.
C. Incident site? Certainly makes it sound like an industrial accident...further solidifying the Chuai station theories.

[bryanflurry]

[Ajking3]

[rhesusmonkeyboy]

Related to "Brownfield"

[Everything's Magic]

I would have preferred the name 1.18.08 but the name Cloverfield is pretty rad.

[Euchre]

Uh, and yet "Cloverfield" is still only registered as a food brand by Cumberland Farms. Check the USPTO site.

[BigThunder]

I like Cloverfield as the name. The movie has been 'known as' Cloverfield from the very beginning of this ARG. Actually, before this ARG started.

Although, just because they put 'Cloverfield' at the end of the trailer doesn't mean that it's the official title. The first trailer had 1-18-08 at the end. Maybe there'll be another one in December with 'Monstrous' at the end.

That would really screw us up wouldn't it?

[Mptangyangnippopoop]

[dtweedokay]

[wizkey]

To me the title card is pretty obvious.

This is a world wide incident and the monster in this specific case is given the name 'cloverfield'.

A monster in Los Angeles may be case designated 'rainbow in your ass', but they didn't find the camera where case designate 'rainbow in your ass' was destroying stuff, so we are not watching that movie.

This is obvious because the in-movie government has an entire listing of 'incident sites', of which this is U.S. (united states) 447.

This would make our 'rainbow in your ass' from L.A. maybe incident site U.S. 231 and the case designate 'tickle trunk' from J.P. incident site 001.

It's kind of like what George Lucas did with the Star Wars movies by starting at episode 4. Here, we are starting at episode 447. It gives the movie an instant implied backstory.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

[Valken]

When I first saw the official title and that "Multiple sightings" crap I got very excited.

Mostly because that means that the whole incident was named Cloverfield by the government. Not just some stage name for a movie in development.

Here's an idea...

Maybe after NY was destroyed the entire place was covered in clovers. And anything that saw the monster was dead. No one killed it. It just came and killed everything and dissapeared from whence it came.

So the "Multiple sightings" crap could be them finding this camera in central park to find out exactly what went down. I'm sure they have other footage but this one doesn't have to be important. It's just evidence for the chest. Evidence that makes a good movie.

Picture a scene of new york destroyed and covered in clovers. Lol. A nice final shot for a movie. Lmao.

[wizkey]

Naw ...

The 'multiple sightings' part is obviously because so many people saw the thing as it was destroying the city. It wasn't just one person seeing it in one place, it was many people seeing it all over the city.

Come on, you guys are just grasping at straws now. It's plain as day.