Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:41 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[REVIEW] AICN Reports First Cloverfield Review
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 2 [26 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
Author Message
CameronJr9
Veteran


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 79
Location: Louisville, KY

[REVIEW] AICN Reports First Cloverfield Review
Kind of...

Not much of a review, but I guess we have to start somewhere. Thoughts?

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34941


Quote:
CLOVERFIELD has been seen!

Hey folks, Harry here - got the following brief review of CLOVERFIELD...

Just saw CLOVERFIELD in a small screening in NYC. IT WAS AWESOME!

I know - you want to know more. Join the fucking club! You also doubt the validity of the claim. Well, I checked with folks to see if it had indeed screened. It was at a Viacom in-house screening with unfinished visual fx.

Add to this - a quote that Moriarty heard one day whilst walking the picket lines from a famous type that had seen the film, but was not associated with it, that felt they had just made "STAR WARS". Now - personally - that's crazy Hyperbole... isn't it?

The film's budget is too small for it to be that amazing... right? But... what if? What if there's a payoff behind the mystery and the buzz. What if we're a month and a half away from a film that we'll all remember the promotion for - and remember when nobody knew what it was called... when the world was thinking H.P. Lovecraft and Voltron... and something called SLUSHO? What if, we're on magic time - getting ready for something... wonderful.... What if?


PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:58 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Arkaham
Unfettered


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 353

Quote:
The film's budget is too small for it to be that amazing


Sad times we live when people think this sentence makes any kind of sense.
_________________
Drowning my worries in Slusho.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
avengedsamurai7
Decorated


Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Posts: 232
Location: You'd like to know, wouldn't you?

B.S. B.S. B.S. B.S. B.S.
_________________
I like pie.

Also, Gears of War is an incredible game, so you should go out and buy it.....


PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:57 pm
 View user's profile Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
saneman
Decorated

Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 154

Cloverfield review: IT WAS AWESOME!

Oy. Rolling Eyes

Thanks for the link anyway. Smile Hopefully we'll get far, far better reviews in the future.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ConfusedCthulhu
Boot

Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 13

Well that fat $%$ was right about star wars II before it came out... Mad

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:16 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SANAND
Boot

Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Posts: 13

I googled "Magic Time" and came up with this:

http://yankeemagic.mlblogs.com/

It is a blog form someone who lives in cali but always talks about NYC. Thought it was interesting.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
zooboomafoo
Veteran


Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 149

I started reading the second review on there and as soon as he started telling "spoilers" I clicked out of the page. I know he was probably bs-ing, but With the movie just a month and a half away, it's not totally rediculous for spoilers to be posted on the net.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
nooneimportant77
Unfettered

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 379

someone else talked about this (or a screening just like it) a few weeks ago

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:18 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
nauttebayo
Veteran


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 111

I believe there was a news report on cloverfieldclues about how secret this movie was being kept. Even the actors had their scripts watermarked with their own name to prevent them from distributing it. I can't imagine there would be any small screenings. This isn't "Must Love Dogs" or something. Also, unfinished visual fx? What is a modern monster movie without fx? A blue screen, that's what. So, to recap, a movie company is showing one small screening of an unfinished movie? B.S.
_________________
Haruhi is God and Konata is her Prophet.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:20 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
nooneimportant77
Unfettered

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Posts: 379

nauttebayo wrote:
I believe there was a news report on cloverfieldclues about how secret this movie was being kept. Even the actors had their scripts watermarked with their own name to prevent them from distributing it. I can't imagine there would be any small screenings. This isn't "Must Love Dogs" or something. Also, unfinished visual fx? What is a modern monster movie without fx? A blue screen, that's what. So, to recap, a movie company is showing one small screening of an unfinished movie? B.S.


they might show it to people at paramount who say, paid for it.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:24 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
nauttebayo
Veteran


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 111

But as far as we know this reviewer has no ties to Paramount, right?

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mattepntr
Greenhorn

Joined: 05 Aug 2007
Posts: 8

I worked on "300" back in March/ April of 2006. We were slamming together
rough versions of all the VFX for a directors screening. This is where the
studio (in this case Warner Bros.) gets their first look at what they've paid
for, in order to set the budget for the rest of post-production and marketing.
The FX were "rough", not "missing".
And this was a full year before the movie was released in theaters.

So these kinds of screenings do happen, although they are usually only held
on studio property, with only select studio personnel allowed.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:34 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

I frankly don't see where this tells us anything remotely new. If these are really people thinking they are giving a review, they are the suckiest reviewers in history. Everything stated is either already known from the trailer or speculated upon based strongly upon the evidence at hand. Real professionals in the film industry ought to be able to speak more intelligently about a film, not this 'oh wow!' and 'ya know it's like...' crap.

If this isn't BS, this is the dumbest crew of leakers we've seen. Considering the secrecy behind this movie and who they would be likely to have at such a screening, I can't believe they'd say things like this. This sounds like teenagers BSing.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Slusho Addict
Entrenched


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 920

It's AICN, nuff said.

Assuming they saw it, they're obviously under contract not to reveal anything about it.

PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:02 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
saneman
Decorated

Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 154

One oddity: the second reviewer claims he's been following the viral promotion of the movie,
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
then states that we don't get much backstory on the monster as a negative.

The viral promotion IS the backstory, guy.


PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:14 pm
Last edited by saneman on Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 2 [26 Posts]   Goto page: 1, 2 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group