Author
Message
CameronJr9
Veteran
Joined: 29 Nov 2007 Posts: 79 Location: Louisville, KY
[REVIEW] AICN Reports First Cloverfield Review Kind of... Not much of a review, but I guess we have to start somewhere. Thoughts?
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/34941
Quote:
CLOVERFIELD has been seen!
Hey folks, Harry here - got the following brief review of CLOVERFIELD...
Just saw CLOVERFIELD in a small screening in NYC. IT WAS AWESOME!
I know - you want to know more. Join the fucking club! You also doubt the validity of the claim. Well, I checked with folks to see if it had indeed screened. It was at a Viacom in-house screening with unfinished visual fx.
Add to this - a quote that Moriarty heard one day whilst walking the picket lines from a famous type that had seen the film, but was not associated with it, that felt they had just made "STAR WARS". Now - personally - that's crazy Hyperbole... isn't it?
The film's budget is too small for it to be that amazing... right? But... what if? What if there's a payoff behind the mystery and the buzz. What if we're a month and a half away from a film that we'll all remember the promotion for - and remember when nobody knew what it was called... when the world was thinking H.P. Lovecraft and Voltron... and something called SLUSHO? What if, we're on magic time - getting ready for something... wonderful.... What if?
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:58 am
Arkaham
Unfettered
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 353
Quote:
The film's budget is too small for it to be that amazing
Sad times we live when people think this sentence makes any kind of sense.
_________________Drowning my worries in Slusho.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:40 am
avengedsamurai7
Decorated
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 232 Location: You'd like to know, wouldn't you?
_________________I like pie.
Also, Gears of War is an incredible game, so you should go out and buy it.....
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 12:57 pm
saneman
Decorated
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Posts: 154
Cloverfield review: IT WAS AWESOME!
Oy.
Thanks for the link anyway. Hopefully we'll get far, far better reviews in the future.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:12 pm
ConfusedCthulhu
Boot
Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 13
Well that fat $%$ was right about star wars II before it came out...
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:16 pm
SANAND
Boot
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 13
I googled "Magic Time" and came up with this:
http://yankeemagic.mlblogs.com/
It is a blog form someone who lives in cali but always talks about NYC. Thought it was interesting.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:17 pm
zooboomafoo
Veteran
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 149
I started reading the second review on there and as soon as he started telling "spoilers" I clicked out of the page. I know he was probably bs-ing, but With the movie just a month and a half away, it's not totally rediculous for spoilers to be posted on the net.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:13 pm
nooneimportant77
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 379
someone else talked about this (or a screening just like it) a few weeks ago
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:18 pm
nauttebayo
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 111
I believe there was a news report on cloverfieldclues about how secret this movie was being kept. Even the actors had their scripts watermarked with their own name to prevent them from distributing it. I can't imagine there would be any small screenings. This isn't "Must Love Dogs" or something. Also, unfinished visual fx? What is a modern monster movie without fx? A blue screen, that's what. So, to recap, a movie company is showing one small screening of an unfinished movie?
_________________Haruhi is God and Konata is her Prophet.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:20 pm
nooneimportant77
Unfettered
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 379
nauttebayo wrote:
I believe there was a news report on cloverfieldclues about how secret this movie was being kept. Even the actors had their scripts watermarked with their own name to prevent them from distributing it. I can't imagine there would be any small screenings. This isn't "Must Love Dogs" or something. Also, unfinished visual fx? What is a modern monster movie without fx? A blue screen, that's what. So, to recap, a movie company is showing one small screening of an unfinished movie?
they might show it to people at paramount who say, paid for it.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:24 pm
nauttebayo
Veteran
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 111
But as far as we know this reviewer has no ties to Paramount, right?
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:30 pm
mattepntr
Greenhorn
Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 8
I worked on "300" back in March/ April of 2006. We were slamming together
rough versions of all the VFX for a directors screening. This is where the
studio (in this case Warner Bros.) gets their first look at what they've paid
for, in order to set the budget for the rest of post-production and marketing.
The FX were "rough", not "missing".
And this was a full year before the movie was released in theaters.
So these kinds of screenings do happen, although they are usually only held
on studio property, with only select studio personnel allowed.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 9:34 pm
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342
I frankly don't see where this tells us anything remotely new. If these are really people thinking they are giving a review, they are the suckiest reviewers in history. Everything stated is either already known from the trailer or speculated upon based strongly upon the evidence at hand. Real professionals in the film industry ought to be able to speak more intelligently about a film, not this 'oh wow!' and 'ya know it's like...' crap.
If this isn't BS, this is the dumbest crew of leakers we've seen. Considering the secrecy behind this movie and who they would be likely to have at such a screening, I can't believe they'd say things like this. This sounds like teenagers BSing.
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:00 pm
Slusho Addict
Entrenched
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 920
It's AICN, nuff said.
Assuming they saw it, they're obviously under contract not to reveal anything about it.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:02 pm
saneman
Decorated
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Posts: 154
One oddity: the second reviewer claims he's been following the viral promotion of the movie,
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
then states that we don't get much backstory on the monster as a negative.
The viral promotion IS the backstory, guy.
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:14 pm
Last edited by saneman on Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:17 pm; edited 1 time in total
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending