Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:11 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[META][SPEC] Origins of the Monster
View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 3 [43 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
McPhearson
Decorated


Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 288

For some reason, I have always leaned towards #1. It's always been my theory that the Chuai station, while searching for sea nectar, accidentally awakens the JJsaurus, and ticks the big guy off.

But now, with this news of physic specialists and satellites, makes me think that this creature is man-made or mutated from man-made creatures.

In other words, I don't know. Very Happy

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:38 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

The crab and octopus imagery on Slusho! and the Tag hack might be hinting at something that walks as much as, if not more than, it swims. If it walked on the ocean floor, it could have knees... maybe? But, the point about the depth is also a damn good one. Something that size, living at that depth, would have to die if it came up to the surface - I'd guess that the pressure change would do it in. Also, if it walked on the ocean-floor, it couldn't breath air like a whale or dolphin b/c it wouldn't ever surface. So, no lungs. No roaring. I suppose it could have some strange sinus system that evolved purely for the purpose of making noises, but then, to communicate with what?

And, that's another problem with a naturally occurring monster: there would have to be others of its kind. Then again, if we can accept that one could stay hidden all this time, then why not more than one? There's a lot of ocean out there. I dunno - maybe this is where we run into a wall trying to make a monster movie "realistic." Gotta suspend disbelief at some point, eh?

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:38 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TBILL
Veteran


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 116

I vote for naturally occuring but previously undiscovered....for what its worth

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

As to the ideas of biomechanics and the creature being a walker from the deep ocean, smartmart and I had a debate about those possibilities here:
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21390&start=45
Basically something native to those depths is less likely to be a biped, and still not too likely to be a quadruped. If it is either of those, it's likely it isn't native to those depths but ended up there.

Something to note about the way the creature moves and attacks - it could be primarily a quadruped but rise to it's haunches to attack with it's forelimbs at times. Bears, the big cats, and other creatures do this. Gorillas actually spend more time moving as quadrupeds than bipeds, even though they do both.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TBILL
Veteran


Joined: 15 Oct 2007
Posts: 116

Euchre wrote:
As to the ideas of biomechanics and the creature being a walker from the deep ocean, smartmart and I had a debate about those possibilities here:
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21390&start=45
Basically something native to those depths is less likely to be a biped, and still not too likely to be a quadruped. If it is either of those, it's likely it isn't native to those depths but ended up there.

Something to note about the way the creature moves and attacks - it could be primarily a quadruped but rise to it's haunches to attack with it's forelimbs at times. Bears, the big cats, and other creatures do this. Gorillas actually spend more time moving as quadrupeds than bipeds, even though they do both.
I swear Euchre, the longer this game goes on the smarter you get...Have you been drinking Slusho!

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:13 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Arctic_ARG_player
Greenhorn

Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 5

Cthulhu mythos

I have my fingers crossed for the Cthulhu mythos. It would make a great American monster line. Plus so much backstory and monsters to choose from.
Cthulhu2.JPG
 Description   
 Filesize   57.2KB
 Viewed   67 Time(s)

Cthulhu2.JPG


PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

TBILL wrote:
I swear Euchre, the longer this game goes on the smarter you get...Have you been drinking Slusho!


Heh, I haven't had a Banana Fanta Slurpee... I mean Banana Anime Slusho! in weeks.

More seriously though, the only reason I know what I do is this:
Sir Walter Scott wrote:
All men who have turned out worth anything has had the chief hand in their own education.

_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
AeroMechanic07
Boot


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 32
Location: Texas/Pennsylvannia

Crying or Very sad what if we never get to see grumpypants ill seriously cry. anyone else?

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:20 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
m_talon
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 142

I have the feeling the origin will be fleshed out via the ARG, but not in the movie. If they want to keep the feel of average Joes caught in a horrible disaster, it won't work to have a long exposition scene where a military scientist guy explains everything. Why would he be talking to a bunch of nobodies from a party, anyway?

Part of the "feel" could be that Rob and co. never do figure out what the monster is or why it's attacking New York. It would be more about how they respond to the situation. JJ has stated he never really wanted to do a whole lot of backstory with LOST, as it was supposed to be about the characters dealing with their circumstances. The backstory has come because the fans wanted it.

With this, he could very well go the route of never explaining the how and why in the movie. It would keep the movie more personal. The backstory information would be left for us to discover during the ARG.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

^^^^^^^^^^
Couldn't agree w/ya more. Since the day I saw the trailer, and realized they might make an entire monster movie in a realistic hand-held approach, I've believed that they wouldn't give any backstory in the movie. Like you said, why would anyone tell Rob & Co. anything? Besides, what would there be to tell? Nobody will know anything, except that "whatever it is, it's winning."

That's also why I've always thought that the ARG phase of this, where we learn whatever backstory they've dreamed up, wouldn't really start until after the movie had been released, after Jan. 18. So far, it seems like it's going that way, since they seem to be leaving the door open for a complicated story involving Noriko, Ganu, Slusho, Tagruato, TIDO, Teddy, etc. It's also a possibility that Jamie isn't going to be in the movie at all; she's purely an online character. The only thing we've seen so far that puts her in the movie is that pic from 1-18-08.com with Jamie, Hud, and Rob. But, that pic. wasn't necessarily taken that night, at that party.

Anyway, here's hoping for a real ARG, a Cloverfield Experience, after the movie comes out. [that way, we can go see it again and again, to find more clues Wink ].

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 2:35 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Clover
Decorated


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 218
Location: TX

blaaaaaah wrote:
Clover wrote:
I don't think so. I mean, I know it's a movie, but suggesting something can just walk around in the ocean floor... I'm not talking about the "shelf" where most sea creatures live (I don't know how far out the "shelf" extends though... ). I'm talking about the drop off after the "shelf." So very deep, and the enormous pressure... I reeeeeally don't think some biped monstery foorah is gonna be coming up from there. :/


But riddle me this:

A hippo can submerge itself and walk on the bottom of a river. Considering how incredibly gigantic this creature is.... could it be a similar correlation?

I understand the relationship between the size of a hippo and the size of the river don't quite match up with this creature and.. the ocean.. but considering the Hippo is a mammal with lots of fat (which floats).. could there be some slight chance of this?

Plus, we honestly don't even know if it's bipedal, to be honest.
But the hippo is primairly a land animal. I'm assuming Grumpypantsasaurus is a sea crature. Heck, maybe it is something capable of surviving the crushing depths; after all, there's still a LOT left undiscovered down there. And I figure it's bipedal/capable of bipedal manuvering based on the legs and angle of the back in the Zapruder-I mean, trailer. I dunno if something from that low could survive in a comparitively low-pressure environment though...

You know what? I am thinking way too hard about all this. XD

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 5:39 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Melampus
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 653

I'm really going to display my ignorance of physics here, but...

The problems seem to be: living in water, walking on land (and being ginormous); and, living in deep ocean pressure and coming to the surface. here's my question for the (bio)physicists: could the fact that the thing is so unbelievable huge allow it to live under deep ocean pressure, but still come up to the surface? I mean, for something as big as a skyscraper, would the pressure down in the deep be comparable to surface gravity? [Euchre, help me out here - bring the knowledge!]

I have no basis for this speculation. Confused

"call it... a hunch. Ba-dum chi!"
- Igor (Eye-gore), Young Frankenstein

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
pegassissy
Unfettered

Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 552

And also, how could something that obviously has not ascended to the surface in 1000s of years(assuming its ancient, huge, and not man made) Suddenly asscend to the surface, rise so easily out of the water, and begin to travel on the land. I know the following example is a God awful one, but i dont know what else there is.

David Blane(I think) was the guy who stayed in that tank of water for a week last year, right? The doctors(though i am sure thye were exagerating, it was just an act after all) were not sure if he would be able to walk again. If Mr. Grumpypants was at the bottem of the ocean for 1000s of years, under enormus amounts of pressure, could he just asscend and begin walking on land, even if he had the means to do so?

EDIT: After rereading Melampus's post, i realized its basically the same thing, so yeah, sorry.
_________________
And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...


PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:22 pm
Last edited by pegassissy on Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Clover
Decorated


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 218
Location: TX

See, this is why I personally hope it's Cthulhu or one of his friends. Because the science part of me would be shut up by the "oh, it's magic, that's how it could survived so long down there then suddenly pop up, bla bla bla." XD

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:25 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Hurley
Decorated


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 299
Location: Where the surfing is good...

A creature with an exo-skeleton may have an easier time adjusting from oceanic depths to land. Not sure how the change in pressure would affect it, though. Some divers have ascended faster than safely allowable, and experienced everything from the bends, to actually expanding in their own skin from the oxygen expanding in their blood stream. Which kind of brings up a good point. If something normally adjusted to deep-sea depths had been forced from its natural habitat, and it could only move inland and to more shallow depths, would that creature be prone to the dementia that some men have experienced from fast-rising? Would it drive the creature mad?

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:52 pm
 View user's profile Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 3 [43 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group