Author
Message
Horned1
Boot
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 41
[SPEC] A possible review on AICN... I didn't see this posted yet, but the review is a regular on AICN, so it sounds like the real thing.
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/35100
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:07 am
Last edited by Horned1 on Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:45 am; edited 1 time in total
Fignut the Elder
Unfettered
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Posts: 330
I don't have the heart to do it(fling the trout) cause technically this was in another thread entirely.
http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=438736#438736
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:10 am
Last edited by Fignut the Elder on Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:26 am; edited 1 time in total
konamouse
Official uF Dietitian
Joined: 02 Dec 2002 Posts: 8010 Location: My own alternate reality
Oh jeese louise. It can't be much of a review - more like SPEC just based on the trailer. Not much of a spoiler since we all know the monster makes mince meat of NYC.
Please [TAG] your subject if you start a new thread. This is [SPEC] but it's also NSFW (the "reviewer" enjoys applying sexual action words to monster actions). And probably needs [TROUT] as well.
_________________
'squeek'
r u a Sammeeeee? I am Forever!
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:13 am
Matthew.Davidlane
Boot
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 68
Neither Do I,
I know im not going to last til Feb for this, i will succumb to the powers of anticipation, im just too damn eager!
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:14 am
Matthew.Davidlane
Boot
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 68
After a minute of saying i wasnt going to, i read it.
I dont know if this is legit, but its F**king hilarious.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:23 am
johnson85
Boot
Joined: 28 Nov 2007 Posts: 26
For those of you afraid that this "review" may spoil something for you...it says nothing. Though it actually says "nothing" in a very entertaining way so it's worth a read.
I highly doubt this is a real review anyway
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:38 am
Horned1
Boot
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 41
Sorry about that... Fixed the tag thingy, though I would have put it under [PRESS] myself since the reviewer -- though completely insane -- have a proven track record with AICN, so I'm inclined to believe that it's real.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:48 am
Horned1
Boot
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 41
P.S. I think [TROUT] is a bit harsh since it was within another thread. Maybe it could be a [CARP], or perhaps a [SUNFISH].
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:52 am
eventfarm
Boot
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 32
no trouts please Mods... please don't label this as trout. New press such as this buried on page 1349 of a random thread may never get seen. (ok, so it's not on p. 1349, but you get the idea...)
If that other thread was labeled [press]All new press items go here... then that would make sense, but it's labeled as something that indicates discussing a specific press article so it won't be followed by those looking for new info.
To keep this OT... I did NOT enjoy reading that child's rantings. I guess I also didn't want to know:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
that the monster rubs against buildings to introduce the MiniGrumpyPants
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:55 am
tigerbaby
Veteran
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 124
based on the spec that:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
that the monster rubs against buildings to introduce the MiniGrumpyPants
could large monster also be being attacked by little ones?
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:59 am
Matthew.Davidlane
Boot
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 68
Re: no trouts please
eventfarm wrote:
Mods... please don't label this as trout. New press such as this buried on page 1349 of a random thread may never get seen. (ok, so it's not on p. 1349, but you get the idea...)
If that other thread was labeled [press]All new press items go here... then that would make sense, but it's labeled as something that indicates discussing a specific press article so it won't be followed by those looking for new info.
To keep this OT... I did NOT enjoy reading that child's rantings. I guess I also didn't want to know:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
that the monster rubs against buildings to introduce the MiniGrumpyPants
I think maybe a [spoiler] tag may be of use because of the above ^^, thats if this is true, which i think it is
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:01 pm
Matthew.Davidlane
Boot
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 68
tigerbaby wrote:
based on the spec that:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
that the monster rubs against buildings to introduce the MiniGrumpyPants
could large monster also be being attacked by little ones?
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I think it means a sort of parasite living off of the monster
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:02 pm
Horned1
Boot
Joined: 28 Sep 2007 Posts: 41
Regarding small monsters... I guess the little monsters didn't seem too spoilery to me since there has been SO much discussion and speculation about them already...
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
well, except for the rubbing part.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:05 pm
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee
Joined: 14 Jul 2007 Posts: 4751 Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth
That would also make it sound like they're not offspring. Basically, an entirely different threat. MGP plowing through the city like a wrecking ball is one thing, but these other little guys running around are probably an entirely different species.
If it is a toxin, the lesser ones have it but MGP is probably clean, all things considered. MGP's probably just a big lumbering oaf that doesn't know what he's doing. He'd probably be a really lovable guy if there wasn't this big honkin' city in his way.
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:10 pm
J0shuaKane
Veteran
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 113
wow, that was fun to read
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:30 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending