Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 18, 2024 8:09 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[SPEC] - Why can't the "fan art" be the actual creature art?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
Author Message
fleabit
Veteran

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 125

[SPEC] - Why can't the "fan art" be the actual creature art?

Just wondering why the fan art for a contest has been ruled out as the actual creature. Perhaps it was leaked? Maybe the artist in question was the artist commissioned to actually creature the concept art for the creature? I could be utterly wrong of course, it could well just be fan art for a contest. But it just seems so perfect. From the design (whale sound / whale head) to the smaller creatures, which we were not really sure about (and still are not), which he included. Are there smaller critters? I'd say the one shot of them trying to close a door where something is trying to break in almost proves there is. That, coupled with the "insider" report that cropped up about yes, there are small creatures, makes me think it is so (not to mention the subway scene).

Could this be a ruse? A disgruntled artist? Someone stealing his art? Some weird angle to show us the creature ahead of time? I'm just blindly guessing here of course, but the creature in his picture just seems too perfect, if you know what I mean.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:36 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
suckaH
Unfettered

Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 672

I hope to God it is. I've always stood by that being the most terrifying monster I have ever seen, concept or not.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:53 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749

Re: [SPEC] - Why can't the "fan art" be the actual creature

I will disect your theory.

Quote:
Just wondering why the fan art for a contest has been ruled out as the actual creature. Perhaps it was leaked? Maybe the artist in question was the artist commissioned to actually creature the concept art for the creature?

They're not idiots. They wouldn't do that after they've kept so much secrecy elsewhere. If they wanted it leaked, it could've been leaked by now.
Quote:

I could be utterly wrong of course, it could well just be fan art for a contest.

exactly

Quote:
But it just seems so perfect.

Who says fan art is bad. Professional artists may be on this board watching, but doesn't mean they're involved in the movie.


Quote:
From the design (whale sound / whale head) to the smaller creatures, which we were not really sure about (and still are not), which he included. Are there smaller critters? I'd say the one shot of them trying to close a door where something is trying to break in almost proves there is. That, coupled with the "insider" report that cropped up about yes, there are small creatures, makes me think it is so (not to mention the subway scene).

Trout

Quote:
Could this be a ruse?

No
Quote:
A disgruntled artist?

Who says he's disgruntled?

Quote:
Someone stealing his art?

If someone stole the picture of the monster, they wouldn't just post it in an art contest...

To sum it all up,
Quote:
I'm just blindly guessing here of course


PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:06 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Saiyan King
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 599
Location: Orlando, The crappiest town in America, thanks to Disney

ACCEPT THE FACT

I wish everyone who is running around looking for a pic of the monster would just accept the fact that noone is seeing the monster before the movie comes out. The actors themeselves dont even know what it looks like, now that tells you the level of secrecy this is under. So, come opening night, when your in your seat at the theater , eating your popcorn and/or canoodling with your date, you can sit back and take in your first sighting of Ol Grumpybutt with the rest of the world. Thinking your gonna find him before that is just like me winning the lottery...... wishful thinking Rolling Eyes
_________________
Nobody kills Kakkarot while im around, destiny has reserved that pleasure for me

The funniest stories always end with "and thats the last time i ever did acid"

Im sorry, I can't loan you $20, Im saving it for Slenderman


PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:02 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

If the fan art you are speaking of is what I think it is, the fact it's still up on the artist's site says it's pretty much not a 'leaked' image by a disgruntled employee or commissioned artist. Paramount would have ordered it down long, long ago. Same applies if it was stolen, and more so really. If it was an intentional leak, I would think they would try to mislead in some other way to more strongly dissuade suspicion that it is the actual monster. There are also scale issues with the art vs the monster's clawmarks, and if you think those are tooth marks - why would they come from a baleen whale?

The artist never claimed it was official, but did say it was their idea of what the Cloverfield monster would look like - and thus is fan art. I see no reason to question their statement at this point, as so much more notoriety could be gained from claiming it's the real deal.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
©Euchre 2007


PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069

We're talking about that giant whale right? I got people in the Facebook group that says that it just looks like Final Fantasy's "Sin." I dunno... what's so damn scary about a whale that eats plankton? Doesn't even have teeth.

Wasn't the creature's code name: The Parasite? Shouldn't we be focusing on why it's called that?

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:42 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fleabit
Veteran

Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 125

Thanks for the intelligent response Euchre. Kraker, perhaps learn to not be such an uptight wanker. Razz Seriously.. you don't come off looking intelligent when you "dissect" a post so pathetically. If you were seeing where I was coming from, you'd understand I already thought all that through. This was an idea that for whatever reason, this was a ruse or misdirection. Heck, maybe this was orginal concept art, and it was changed.

The addition of "parasites" (which does in fact, match one of the codenames) was the kicker that made me wonder. Mostly I don't have a clue simply because I don't know the timeline. Was that art done after the "parasite" title was given the movie? I think it was done well before any talk of "smaller monsters" was announced, but I'm not certain on that one.

Euchre, I had been on that artists site, and I missed where he made a disclaimer that this was not related to the movie at all, and was just his own fancy.

Also, this monster is not like Sin from Final Fantasy, other than they are both big. I don't see many similarities at all (having played that FF all the way through).

Anyways, just some rambling reasoning, it seemed slow around here. Very Happy

I agree a whale-head seems a bit tame. What's it going to do.. filter everyone? But I could see that as orginal concept art, which has since been modified.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:21 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Itsumo
Veteran


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 93

Well the fanart of the whale is listed by the author as fanart and just his own (Very cool, want to see that monster in a movie) work.

I'm sure anyone connected with the film has had to sign some pretty hefty non-disclosure agreements, and there's likely an even more terrifying monster than MGP (a legion of lawyers) backing that up.

For that reason, I expect people very close to key concepts such as monster design would never dream of opening themselves to the liability of allowing a single scrap of design detail to be publicly disclosed, even as early concept art or as fan art.

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:04 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
terrapinbear
Veteran


Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 114

<rant>While the "fan art" could be the actual creature art, I personally don't care for the idea of a skyscraper sized mutant whale as NYC's pants spanker. In my mind I see a centipede-style creature with various appendages waving around and occasionally knocking the heads off of notable landmarks. The biggest problem I have with the fan art in question is that it looks like a man in a rubber suit. In this era of CG there is no excuse for another two-legged rubber godjira...</rant>
_________________
“This one will come home to Ganu!”Catfight!

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Fignut the Elder
Unfettered


Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 330

blog

This is a link to the artists blog for the o so famous art pic of the creature and the SOL and the little monster art.

http://dougblot.blogspot.com/2007_09_01_archive.html

This is for those readers who may have not a clue as to what this thread is referring.

Scroll down the page....no leak here...just a very talented blogger! Smile
peace

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
m_talon
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 142

Re: [SPEC] - Why can't the "fan art" be the actual creature art?

fleabit wrote:
I'm just blindly guessing here of course, but the creature in his picture just seems too perfect, if you know what I mean.


Well, I was on the original board the art was posted on. Doug does art for a living, so yeah it was really good. As stated, though, it was just art that he did for the contest. He ran with the Slusho/whale/parasite theme and that's what he came up with.

So, it's most definitely NOT the critter. A different artist (Phil Koning) is doing the art direction for the movie along with Tippett Studios. Those guys have been in the biz long enough to know what the letters NDA mean, so there won't be any leaks until they want it to leak out.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [11 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group