Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:16 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[SEEN IT] So, I went to the paramount screening tonight...
View previous topicView next topic
Page 26 of 58 [862 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, ..., 56, 57, 58  Next
Author Message
privacyflower
Boot


Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 19

 		well to be honest, and not to just throw out a random disgusting idea, when i first saw that smoke it looked like a big.. vagina.. to me. not even gonna try to lie. that was my first thought. haha

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:25 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cole
Account Disabled


Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 271
Southside wrote:
Cole wrote:
Southside wrote:
privacyflower wrote:
as much as i'm disappointed by this review (whether it be legit or not) the fact that LC took time away from her life to come on here and tell us the information she has (again, whether it be legit or not) shouldn't be met with such hostility and anger. yes, skepticism is alright, even i admit to being skeptical. but attacking an innocent OP who is either a) lying or b) has pulled a pretty big one over on most of the people in this thread, isn't worth it. just take a deep breath, take a step back from your computer and realize it's just the internet and it's just a movie we're going to see in a week anyway.

and, LC, if this turns out to be true, props for being the first person to give us a REAL rundown of the movie. and just be glad people weren't as mean as they were to "i love ponies" or that other guy who posted his bogus movie review.

[/END OPRAH-LIKE RANT]


I thought LC was a guy???


well,...that makes sense to how LC got an early screening to begin with!

incase you didn't get that ......."Flash"! lol


Oh you're female???


huh? uh uh!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:30 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cole
Account Disabled


Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 271
starshiptrooper wrote:
This is funny. Over in THIS thread:

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23370&start=60

They are arguing over whether or not that's the monsters LEG or TAIL. Not a mention of a face. Guess you can see anything in all that smoke.


wow, uhm, I have no idea why they're seeing a tail or a leg. lol

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:31 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		I had no idea why people saw tentacles in the Chuai videos, but they swore on their momma's eye's that they were there.

Of course, according to this review, and every other one, Chuai, Tag and this whole ARG means nothing.
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:35 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
keseki
Boot

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 65

 		"It's face is human/snake-like.
Slit nose, 2 slit-ish black eyes"

wait wait wait, so your saying, the point in the english video i pointed out WAS RIGHT? awesome, my first correct thing! and everyone played it off like i was dumb and silly

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:44 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
MisterMudd
Veteran


Joined: 09 Dec 2007
Posts: 128
privacyflower wrote:
well to be honest, and not to just throw out a random disgusting idea, when i first saw that smoke it looked like a big.. vagina.. to me. not even gonna try to lie. that was my first thought. haha


Well, if you're gonna see something...




































...might as well be a vagina Wink

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:45 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Southside
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 131
MisterMudd wrote:
privacyflower wrote:
well to be honest, and not to just throw out a random disgusting idea, when i first saw that smoke it looked like a big.. vagina.. to me. not even gonna try to lie. that was my first thought. haha


Well, if you're gonna see something...





...might as well be a vagina Wink



i see one between your legs! Wink


I kid! i kid!

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:56 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cookson
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 115

 		This LC person is lying. While most of what she says is most likely accurate, I believe she just put two and two together. Then said the movie is based in May just to screw around with us.

Why is this fake?

Well, you don't have to look further then the first website we found regarding this movie, 1-18-08.com ... the pictures are dated 1/18/08....which are in the movie.

So LC, why not just spare the time and just say you just made this up to screw around with us? Abrams' and company arn't stupid enough to make this not be based on 1-18-08....... and the proof is not only in the viral stuff(the dates in which everything occurs), but the pictures themselves that are in the movie on 1-18-08.com have the same date on which it happened.....

Now again, I think you basically got it right.....but we just found out about everything you typed 6 hours before you created this thread.....

So yeah.....you just came up with a monster description....

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:02 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		Reeves said in an interview that 1-18-08 was never intended to be the actual date of the attack. They just used the date because that was the release date, and without a title there had to be someway to promote the movie online.
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:04 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Cookson
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 115
starshiptrooper wrote:
Reeves said in an interview that 1-18-08 was never intended to be the actual date of the attack. They just used the date because that was the release date, and without a title there had to be someway to promote the movie online.


I need an article/link man...

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:06 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		I'm too lazy. Someone will provide soon. Where's Euchre?
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:07 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Cookson
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 115
starshiptrooper wrote:
I'm too lazy. Someone will provide soon. Where's Euchre?


Yeah, I need to see where Reeves' said this...because its pretty damn important if you ask me. How would something like this just slip by without anyone noticing? I can forgive them if they actually said it in the past....but if not, we need an explanation NOW why they decided to have it based in May.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:08 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		Ok, hold on, I'll go look


Here:

Regarding the date. From IESB's interview of Matt Reeves:

Quote:
IESB: The date had played such a huge role in the advertising. Is it true that if you to see this on the day it comes out, 1-18-08, the date in the film is actually that date as well?

Reeves: No, that's not true. The date has become because, again, we didn't have the title in the teaser and so that was a way of letting people know what it was. I think the two ways people referred to the movie where by its codename, Cloverfield, because there was knowledge of that, and just by the date. The reveal is really what happens in the story and the way it unfolds and the sort of mysteries in that world. The date is just the date we come out and when everyone gets to see the movie



Also, go back to page 15 of this very thread.
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:10 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Cookson
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 115

 		lol....I need a link. That's just someone typing something for all we know.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:20 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cookson
Veteran

Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 115

 		Found the article....

http://www.iesb.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3945&Itemid=99

WOW...how did this pass by without anyone noticing? I forgive them....

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 26 of 58 [862 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, ..., 56, 57, 58  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group