Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Tue Nov 19, 2024 11:15 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[SPEC] 1-18-08 - Date inconsistencies?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 4 of 6 [78 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
Author Message
nicodemoscain
Boot

Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 25

Wow...the one thing I haven't seen anyone address is the fact that J.J. Abrams is the mind-f*** king of the universe. The more I read about people fighting over the real-time events of the movie, the more I come to understand that this is what he wanted us to do. He wanted to see what we would say to this and he wants us to start questioning our own judgements of the movie.

Why?

Simple. The movies that everyone has been talking about are just pre-screenings! They have nothing to do with the real time of the movie because he KNEW people would run off and blab their mouths off about every little detail. I have the crazy feeling that we have yet to see or hear of the final cut of anything yet. I would not put it against J.J. AT ALL to have made two, maybe even THREE versions of the movie just to mess with our heads. The man is that much of a genius. I can feel it.

That is just my opinion on the whole matter. I have been wrong before. I guess we will all find out what really happens next Friday. Cool

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:30 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
golfguitarist
Boot

Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 13

I dont remember where i saw it....... but i do remember either JJ or one of the staff saying that the movie does not actually take place in January. He said people think these clues and viral marketing are playing up to the actual day of the attack but its not so. It is found footage, JJ says himself.


Plus........ just look at the movie clips, i think if it were taking place in January there'd be a little more wintery weather for it being in New York.

So im pretty sure the attack doesnt happen on 1-18-08. I know ive seen someone on the production team say its not.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069

golfguitarist wrote:
I dont remember where i saw it....... but i do remember either JJ or one of the staff saying that the movie does not actually take place in January. He said people think these clues and viral marketing are playing up to the actual day of the attack but its not so. It is found footage, JJ says himself.


Plus........ just look at the movie clips, i think if it were taking place in January there'd be a little more wintery weather for it being in New York.

So im pretty sure the attack doesnt happen on 1-18-08. I know ive seen someone on the production team say its not.


it was Matt Reeves that says it doesn't take place in January.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:45 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JadedMax
Decorated


Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 157

At this point it has to be said.

Dear sweet Jesus. Ya know many people have checked out due to merely the fact that with days to go they don't want their movie experience to be ruined by people spamming spoilers in these forums.

But seriously in my case since I've had access to this movie I just find the interactivity with others involved in it the major reason I stuck around. I've not seen all of the movie, but selected parts.

But what I am seeing is this rampant annoying thing that's bugged me to no end the entire time. Once again, just because this entire thing when it hit had the Ethan Haas stuff associated with it, baseless assumptions have stuck with it the entire time.

You know I can punch up the new Lost ARG or whatever.. A centralized website, with videos depicting specific aspects of a "game." I could go to Eldridge, or the others like the Year Zero. In each there's an organized theme there that lets you know.

NEVER was there any indication, whatsoever that Cloverfield was associated with any ARG. There's no main website with a timeline or structure or symetrical theme breaking things down into weeks or measures of time where progress can be shown.

We did get the all too famous 1-18-08.com site. And people at the onset I guess sat there flipping around pictures and found other things related to the movie like the Myspace pages. Congratulations, you found other aspects of what's called marketing. Not a game.

The whole point of this is simple. Now people have sand in their asses and are resentful at people who created all of this, not because of anything the creators did, but because for some reason someone jammed this damned notion that this is all one big ARG and continued to force everyone to subscribe to it so much it is now actual reality to them.

It's gotten so ridiculous that now people are saying the goddamn movie itself is "Out Of Game."

It's insane. And beyond annoying.

To be honest look at the lunacy. These are people that play games that involve alternate realities, yet the fact that the movie may take place in May in it's reality, and the marketing is going on now is an issue.

If you believe so much in Alternate Realities.. How about you deal with it.

Or how about we all grasp one fact that a few of us have understood a week or so into this. It's not an ARG.

I am happy for the fact this unfolded on a forum specifically specialized in dealing with them. But this was never intended to be one. And has never shown a modicum of evidence that it was.


If you can digest a bit of real reality. The timeline in the movie really doesn't matter much.

It's just a movie. Has been, all along. If you realize this the movie could take place February 29th on a leap year and still be enjoyable.
_________________
http://savejourneyman.net/

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:55 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
visitor
Kilroy

Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 1

YEES! ^^^

I have been following these forums for a while now and was too scared to post anything. Just recently I've been trying to fight the urge to post my opinions and thank God some of you have done that for me.

The whole time thing was already established by JJ before people found out about the May and Jan. discrepancy. Even if it wasn't it wouldn't make any sense. Here's why: How are we [the audience] witnessing something that is going on the same night (of course not REALLY but ya know) and is being videotaped as we watch? It isn't possible. JJ and his team have been stressing the realism of this movie from day one so why would they let something as blatently impossible slip through the cracks. Trust me JJ Abrams wouldn't miss this minor detail. What we will be seeing on 1-18-08 is what was found. So basically WE are the eyes of whoever found the tape. And the monster attacked NYC the previous year in May. Why the time gap? We don't know that yet but I'm sure it will be explained in some way... maybe not in this particular film, but in a future film. Maybe.

*Exhales deeply* I finally got it all out there. These are my opinions and I could be wrong but I am confident. lol. Thanks for letting me interrupt you guys' ARG. For the record you're all the raddest people around!

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069

Re: At this point it has to be said.

JadedMax wrote:
Dear sweet Jesus. Ya know many people have checked out due to merely the fact that with days to go they don't want their movie experience to be ruined by people spamming spoilers in these forums.

But seriously in my case since I've had access to this movie I just find the interactivity with others involved in it the major reason I stuck around. I've not seen all of the movie, but selected parts.

But what I am seeing is this rampant annoying thing that's bugged me to no end the entire time. Once again, just because this entire thing when it hit had the Ethan Haas stuff associated with it, baseless assumptions have stuck with it the entire time.

You know I can punch up the new Lost ARG or whatever.. A centralized website, with videos depicting specific aspects of a "game." I could go to Eldridge, or the others like the Year Zero. In each there's an organized theme there that lets you know.

NEVER was there any indication, whatsoever that Cloverfield was associated with any ARG. There's no main website with a timeline or structure or symetrical theme breaking things down into weeks or measures of time where progress can be shown.

We did get the all too famous 1-18-08.com site. And people at the onset I guess sat there flipping around pictures and found other things related to the movie like the Myspace pages. Congratulations, you found other aspects of what's called marketing. Not a game.

The whole point of this is simple. Now people have sand in their asses and are resentful at people who created all of this, not because of anything the creators did, but because for some reason someone jammed this damned notion that this is all one big ARG and continued to force everyone to subscribe to it so much it is now actual reality to them.

It's gotten so ridiculous that now people are saying the goddamn movie itself is "Out Of Game."

It's insane. And beyond annoying.

To be honest look at the lunacy. These are people that play games that involve alternate realities, yet the fact that the movie may take place in May in it's reality, and the marketing is going on now is an issue.

If you believe so much in Alternate Realities.. How about you deal with it.

Or how about we all grasp one fact that a few of us have understood a week or so into this. It's not an ARG.

I am happy for the fact this unfolded on a forum specifically specialized in dealing with them. But this was never intended to be one. And has never shown a modicum of evidence that it was.


If you can digest a bit of real reality. The timeline in the movie really doesn't matter much.

It's just a movie. Has been, all along. If you realize this the movie could take place February 29th on a leap year and still be enjoyable.


Thank God someone else who agrees with me said something... I was beginning to believe that I was the only one arguing that point.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JadedMax
Decorated


Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 157

Re: At this point it has to be said.

xboyonfirex wrote:


Thank God someone else who agrees with me said something... I was beginning to believe that I was the only one arguing that point.


There are a few of us left. Most of us have been chased away, I'm sure.
_________________
http://savejourneyman.net/

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
ian mckenyon (ean_mc)
Veteran

Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 70

i imagine that, after friday, there will be posts asking if new york got destroyed or not... c'mon guys...

*although*

i thought it did take place in January... seeing as how rob said he is leaving for japan in the middle of this month...meh

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:29 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
crow
Veteran

Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 112

Re: At this point it has to be said.

JadedMax wrote:
Dear sweet Jesus. Ya know many people have checked out due to merely the fact that with days to go they don't want their movie experience to be ruined by people spamming spoilers in these forums.

But seriously in my case since I've had access to this movie I just find the interactivity with others involved in it the major reason I stuck around. I've not seen all of the movie, but selected parts.

But what I am seeing is this rampant annoying thing that's bugged me to no end the entire time. Once again, just because this entire thing when it hit had the Ethan Haas stuff associated with it, baseless assumptions have stuck with it the entire time.

You know I can punch up the new Lost ARG or whatever.. A centralized website, with videos depicting specific aspects of a "game." I could go to Eldridge, or the others like the Year Zero. In each there's an organized theme there that lets you know.

NEVER was there any indication, whatsoever that Cloverfield was associated with any ARG. There's no main website with a timeline or structure or symetrical theme breaking things down into weeks or measures of time where progress can be shown.

We did get the all too famous 1-18-08.com site. And people at the onset I guess sat there flipping around pictures and found other things related to the movie like the Myspace pages. Congratulations, you found other aspects of what's called marketing. Not a game.

The whole point of this is simple. Now people have sand in their asses and are resentful at people who created all of this, not because of anything the creators did, but because for some reason someone jammed this damned notion that this is all one big ARG and continued to force everyone to subscribe to it so much it is now actual reality to them.

It's gotten so ridiculous that now people are saying the goddamn movie itself is "Out Of Game."

It's insane. And beyond annoying.

To be honest look at the lunacy. These are people that play games that involve alternate realities, yet the fact that the movie may take place in May in it's reality, and the marketing is going on now is an issue.

If you believe so much in Alternate Realities.. How about you deal with it.

Or how about we all grasp one fact that a few of us have understood a week or so into this. It's not an ARG.

I am happy for the fact this unfolded on a forum specifically specialized in dealing with them. But this was never intended to be one. And has never shown a modicum of evidence that it was.


If you can digest a bit of real reality. The timeline in the movie really doesn't matter much.

It's just a movie. Has been, all along. If you realize this the movie could take place February 29th on a leap year and still be enjoyable.


AMEN!

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:01 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

I started to read this thread, then I went largely into 'scan mode' because it started to devolve into this petty 'ARG has nothing to do with the movie' tripe people are getting pointlessly upset about. To that I merely say this is an interactive viral campaign, not the usual definition of ARG, and in many respects a new form of Chaotic Fiction (CF). Because it doesn't follow the 'strict' standards of an ARG, people are getting flustered with it's incongruities with what's being said about the film - and so few have actually seen it to know better. (I thought that ARGs are still a revolutionary idea that is still largely undefinable? I guess some people just have to put a box around things.)

So if this is an 'IVC', and if it was outsourced (likely it would seem), then there is a good chance as speculated that secrecy kept them from sustaining good continuity. That's a really stupid stomp in the proverbial feces for sure. I tend to think there's more than just that to explain things, which I may find or figured out when I see the film...

Speaking of which...

Having not seen it yet, I have a strong suspicion that unless they outright tell you what month it is or the date, we have no solid evidence of that in the film. As many of you have probably noticed, I have an eye for some of the finest details in a big picture (remember Trinity using nmap in Matrix Reloaded?). I have to spoiler this, because it was rumored and I tripped on the info already and don't want it to 'ruin' anything for others:
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
I wouldn't be surprised if the actors didn't really know the proper date of events and that the footage from Rob and Beth being taped over is from last May. Could explain why they've not been lovers on MySpace since at least July.


Of course, as some of you have speculated the online story might try to find a way to go on until May - but that means MGP has a long time to meander around before coming ashore. And yeah, it also means Rob's departure is going to change somehow.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:32 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JadedMax
Decorated


Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 157

With all of that said. I just look at it all now as if people are putting their wants and needs ahead of the primary reason this whole thing exists. We're pretty much all here because of Cloverfield.

Maybe people feel duped or cheated but look at the big picture. We're all a part of something pretty damned cool. What we call it, or the name of it, ARG or ARE or whatever semantics you want to use sucks.

It saps the fun right out of it. Now a segment of those following it have turned negative and are ruining it, right at the end. Because they've been conditioned that Cloverfield the movie has to be squeezed into this narrow box with stuff like the dates have to match up, or this photo is non canon, or this storyline was left out of the movie, or Jamie's not there or whatever.

What was a neat little experience turned into this labored obsession. I just want to see the movie, chill out with other fans and spread the word.

That's it.
_________________
http://savejourneyman.net/

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:35 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
m_talon
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 142

JadedMax wrote:
With all of that said. I just look at it all now as if people are putting their wants and needs ahead of the primary reason this whole thing exists. We're pretty much all here because of Cloverfield.

Maybe people feel duped or cheated but look at the big picture. We're all a part of something pretty damned cool. What we call it, or the name of it, ARG or ARE or whatever semantics you want to use sucks.

It saps the fun right out of it. Now a segment of those following it have turned negative and are ruining it, right at the end. Because they've been conditioned that Cloverfield the movie has to be squeezed into this narrow box with stuff like the dates have to match up, or this photo is non canon, or this storyline was left out of the movie, or Jamie's not there or whatever.

What was a neat little experience turned into this labored obsession. I just want to see the movie, chill out with other fans and spread the word.

That's it.


A-BLANKING-MEN, brother. Only reason I've even posted in these threads is to try to soothe over some of the hurt feelings by offering ways to reconcile the differences. In actuality, I really couldn't care less. It's easy for me to say "oops, the writers of the online story made a goof. Apparently, JJ and Matt didn't communicate with them. Oh well, they'll either fix it or move on."

Inconsistencies happen. Why do you think it takes months/years to get a book out? The author and the editor have to go through it multiple times to make sure that something isn't out of place like saying a 30 year old was alive during the 60s. The online story we got for Cloverfield was probably put together after the teaser came out.

If people want to let a couple of mistakes in the online story ruin the movie or the experience, then frankly those are the kind of fans we can do without. They're the ones who ruin fandom for the rest of us with. It's entertainment, folks, not some contract between you and the writers. Just be grateful we've got a movie and online story to talk about, otherwise this would be another icky January full of cruddy movies.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:18 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ivo
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Location: Illinois, USA

Quote:
The movie sounds like it's OOG, which would mean i've wasted hours and hours writing and reading about this stuff.


Nothing could have changed this fact. The wasting, I mean.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:50 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
m_talon
Veteran


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 142

Ivo wrote:
Quote:
The movie sounds like it's OOG, which would mean i've wasted hours and hours writing and reading about this stuff.


Nothing could have changed this fact. The wasting, I mean.


Ding! Winner!

Guess what folks...we're not curing cancer here. We aren't helping the homeless or raising money for charity. This is time wasting at its best.

Everyone take a deep breath and repeat after me:

"It's just a movie. It's just a story."

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:00 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ivo
Unfettered


Joined: 29 Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Location: Illinois, USA

m_talon wrote:


"It's just a movie. It's just a story."


Agree, I mean do these people get this upset when they don't get "rewarded" for a three hour game of Monopoly, other than being able your collection of Railroads in a friend's face.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 9:04 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 4 of 6 [78 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group