Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:57 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
New http://www.1-18-08.com/ Piccy
View previous topicView next topic
Page 8 of 12 [172 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
Her
Decorated


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 160

 		Re: I like the Theory...
SuperSquirrel wrote:
starshiptrooper wrote:
SuperSquirrel wrote:
starshiptrooper wrote:
These pictures are obviously not part of the movie timeline. Don't see what the big debate is. This could be a shot taken AFTER MGP attacks New York. As I said before, these pics could just represent a file someone has on the "Monster Attack of '08"

They could've just blurred out the SOL in the backgound just to keep us speculating.


Like a portfolio someone is building to explain to authorities or the president,the events leading up to and during "case designate 'Cloverfield'".


Exactly! Every time there's a new pic, everybody freaks and tries to figure out what it means.

Maybe they don't "mean" anything, they're just pictures of what happened. And after the movie comes out (Officially) we'll have access to the whole file.


Yes! And we may then, get the whole backstory. Like the reanimation of the Monster etc. OR...maybe all of these "exhibits" (good word yes?) will be presented in some kind of case of WORLD VS. TAG....or....TAG vs TIDO...


Yes, I like this too. It definitely fits. A dossier of sorts.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:36 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		This file IS "Case Designate 'Cloverfield'", and will be primary evidence in "The City, County, and State of New York vs. Tagruato"
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:36 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Her
Decorated


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 160
Cole wrote:
do..we...know...why....there's....a....blur?.....?


The collective figures that someone blurred out something that shouldn't have been seen.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SuperSquirrel
Unfettered


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 396

 		If we follow the Theory
Cole wrote:
do..we...know...why....there's....a....blur?.....?


That these are exhibits in a case against TAG or TIDO, the authorities would have blurred the designation of a Naval ship perhaps, it would then follow that the "teaser" is being presented in the same case and so the blurred face of the soldier...

What do ya think?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:37 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cole
Account Disabled


Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 271
Her wrote:
Cole wrote:
do..we...know...why....there's....a....blur?.....?


The collective figures that someone blurred out something that shouldn't have been seen.


thank you!

geez better than nothing.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:38 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
eventfarm
Boot


Joined: 20 Aug 2007
Posts: 32

 		Is it really a blur?
Seems to me like the "blurs" are pretty square... can anyone zoom in on them? They look like screen shots to me...

Could this be Janice's picture?

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:39 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Southside
Veteran


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 131
Cole wrote:
do..we...know...why....there's....a....blur?.....?


NO..............

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:40 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SuperSquirrel
Unfettered


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 396

 		Wholly Crap!!
starshiptrooper wrote:
This file IS "Case Designate 'Cloverfield'", and will be primary evidence in "The City, County, and State of New York vs. Tagruato"


YES!!! (Jumps up and down clapping hands!!!!)

The Case, designate, "Cloverfield"

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		I like this idea.

So the pics on 01-18-08.com are part of a file compiled to be provided in a report, or court case, about what happened in
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
May, 2007
. The "Movie" is a video that's also part of the report. Considering the destruction caused by the monster and the
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
military nuke strike
this video could be the only eye-witness account available.

So this event happened in
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
May of 2007
, and the file, report is filed or presented on
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
January 18th, 2008
.

Could reconcile the
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
date difference
between the marketing and the movie.
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:42 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Her
Decorated


Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 160

 		Re: If we follow the Theory
SuperSquirrel wrote:
Cole wrote:
do..we...know...why....there's....a....blur?.....?


That these are exhibits in a case against TAG or TIDO, the authorities would have blurred the designation of a Naval ship perhaps, it would then follow that the "teaser" is being presented in the same case and so the blurred face of the soldier...

What do ya think?


Sounds good to me. that's two for you; one more and you win the big stuffed animal on the boardward. Very Happy

Starshiptrooper: Regular Sherlock Holmes, you are! Laughing

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:43 pm
Last edited by Her on Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
retina
Decorated

Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 197

 		I hate it when there's spoilers in IG threads.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:45 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
NYC5
Unfettered


Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 418
Location: New York City

 		You Can't Tamper With Evidence...
If this was a file for case "Cloverfield" they wouldn't blur things out. You can't tamper with evidence, especially blocking out important pieces of the material like the main part of a destroyed ship. The damage is critical in understanding the beast's ability...I happen to love the idea, but the blurring is really screwing it up for me.

Lets try to keep spoilers out of this, covered or not....
_________________
He's got the whole world in his hands.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:45 pm
Last edited by NYC5 on Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		Sorry, but I couldn't say what I was trying to say without some mild spoilers.

At least I covered them!

Quote:
If this was a file for case "Cloverfield" they wouldn't blur things out. You can't tamper with evidence, especially blocking out important pieces of the material like the main part of a destroyed ship. The damage is critical in understanding the beast's ability...I happen to love the idea, but the blurring is really screwing it up for me.


Perhaps they're just blurred right now, because we aren't supposed to know what's there untill the movie comes out. The soldiers face was blurred in the teaser, but not later. Maybe after the movie this pic will be re-added to the site, without the blurring.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:46 pm
Last edited by starshiptrooper on Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
SuperSquirrel
Unfettered


Joined: 16 Nov 2007
Posts: 396

 		The date stamps on the pictures will then
starshiptrooper wrote:
I like this idea.

So the pics on 01-18-08.com are part of a file compiled to be provided in a report, or court case, about what happened in
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
May, 2007
. The "Movie" is a video that's also part of the report. Considering the destruction caused by the monster and the
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
military nuke strike
this video could be the only eye-witness account available.

So this event happened in
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
May of 2007
, and the file, report is filed or presented on
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
January 18th, 2008
.

Could reconcile the
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
date difference
between the marketing and the movie.


Reflect the date stamp that the images were retrieved from the camera? How would that work...

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
starshiptrooper
Entrenched


Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 792
Location: Shelbyville, TN

 		I have a theory on that, but can't say it without another spoiler. How's about a PM?
_________________
http://www.whiskeyoutpost.net/forum/index.php

PostPosted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:49 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 8 of 12 [172 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group