unforum

[Transparent Blue]

Re: This is buggin me!!!

[irishman]

Here's a pic of the object hitting the water

[EmmanuelGoldstein]

you *really* cant see anything in that picture.

[Random_kid]

NO! not true!
you can see a tiny, little, itty-bitty, minescule, microscopic splash on the far right of the water
but you have to know what you're looking for to see it

but youre right its pretty much nothing

[WartyHogger]

^ agree to both, it's around the cruise ship. For some reason, i knew to look in that direction first time i saw it, everyone was just saying, look at the water look at the water.!!!

[jublets]

^ agreed as well, it seems like followers of the arg knew something else had to be coming at the end, cuz the only people ive talked to who saw it has been interested in the arg including myself

[JookNy21]

So what about when JJ Abrams was interviewed and he confirmed that the monster had been living in the deep sea for thousands of years?

[KidReviewer]

def saw it hitting the ocean

[Some Thing]

Whatever hit the ocean, it was way out there.
It looks closer than it really is because of the long-angle perspective of the view.

I kinda like the idea of seeing the creature fall out of the sky a month before the attack.
What I don't like about it is that it pretty much invalidates most of the backstory.

[ScubaSteve1717]

Re: I Cannot Stress To You

[TheMaximum]

[ScubaSteve1717]

i dont see how making a sequel is a terrible idea, they want to tell a story, they just set it up basically with this movie, sure the stuff on the internet is filling things in, but it doesnt have nearly as many viewers and followers as the actual movie, a sequel is basically guaranteed, and i dont think he meant an actual remake, is JJ Abrams supposed to say "sorry guys i blew it lets re try it"? I think he just meant a sequel, which makes perfect sense, I really appreciated the movie for what it was, but why stop here? If JJ sticks with it, it should still be great.

Whats so terrible about a sequel?

[TheMaximum]

Simple. The sequel makes the original film PART ONE. It reduces the importance and magnitude of Cloverfield. It lessens Rob's struggle and makes the presence of the monster and it's parasites less shocking. Another scene showing the results of the parasite's bite would also hurt the shocking imagery of the original scene. Do you see what I'm saying? I believe that the incredible film should stand on it's own because it's so very powerful already.

[ScubaSteve1717]

so the entirety of the story is supposed to end on "i love you" "i love you too" "i had a great day" *clue* credits *clue*

sure thats epic and powerful and touching and someday might be iconic, but there is so much that still needs to be answered, i cant see this as a stand alone event

they could ruin it obviously, but this just seems like everything is done for a reason and that they know what they are doing. you cant end a movie with so many questions, most of them not even because of ambiguity, and then just stop

i see what you are saying, but this is still the first, it will remain what it is

[xboyonfirex]