Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:20 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[Spec][Spoilers] More Than 1 "Mother Monsters"?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 9 of 12 [179 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
SlushomakesMEhappy
Decorated


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 164

Give me a moment to laugh at how painfully obvious everything points to one monster.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 4751
Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth

Quote:
If there was more than one MGP, would we have not gotten two figurines?


/devil's advocacy enabled

Not if both monsters looked the same.

/devil's advocacy disabled

And, please, don't start comparing this to religion. The FSM might have to smite you.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:21 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
SlushomakesMEhappy
Decorated


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 164

Nighthawk wrote:
Quote:
If there was more than one MGP, would we have not gotten two figurines?


/devil's advocacy enabled

Not if both monsters looked the same.

/devil's advocacy disabled

And, please, don't start comparing this to religion. The FSM might have to smite you.
No they would sell two toys if there were TWO monsters. THERES ONE MONSTER GET OVER IT. And if you like TWO monsters that much look up Zilla.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
gigantis2001
Decorated


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 282
Location: Columbus, Ohio

fenix wrote:
econaz02 is right. You guys can't prove that there is only one monster without overlooking the discrepancies in the monster design.


There are no discrepancies.

Quote:
Every think that with all the quotes about the 'monster', they are only referring to one of them? Mainly, the biggest most filmed one? Because throughout the movie, the focus is on it, and with all the explosions and running about, I imagine it could be very easy to overlook a much smaller monster (which killed Hud) lurking around a park.


No. That's dumb, and makes no sense.

Quote:
Furthermore, the more I see Cloverfield, the more I think that the bridge wasn't destroyed by the same monster which is shot throughout the movie. The size just doesn't fit, it wasn't THAT huge.


Look at the clip on yahoo called "the monster revealed." Look at how the monster's head towers over the buildings at the end of the clip.

Quote:
because of the differences


I just said there are no discrepancies. Changing the word to differences doesn't do anything, yo.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:47 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tMan930
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 458
Location: Up In There

gigantis2001 wrote:
fenix wrote:
econaz02 is right. You guys can't prove that there is only one monster without overlooking the discrepancies in the monster design.


There are no discrepancies.

Quote:
Every think that with all the quotes about the 'monster', they are only referring to one of them? Mainly, the biggest most filmed one? Because throughout the movie, the focus is on it, and with all the explosions and running about, I imagine it could be very easy to overlook a much smaller monster (which killed Hud) lurking around a park.


No. That's dumb, and makes no sense.

Quote:
Furthermore, the more I see Cloverfield, the more I think that the bridge wasn't destroyed by the same monster which is shot throughout the movie. The size just doesn't fit, it wasn't THAT huge.


Look at the clip on yahoo called "the monster revealed." Look at how the monster's head towers over the buildings at the end of the clip.

Quote:
because of the differences


I just said there are no discrepancies. Changing the word to differences doesn't do anything, yo.


Well, you don't think there are any discrepancies. Others (obviously) would argue that point.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:49 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
econaz02
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 27

The toy? If that toy is Accurate then there is a SERIOUOS problem and there is DEF. more than one monster. That thing look tottaly diffrent. Lung shits are fucking like black. Color is off.

Just cause I have little post's or I joined late doesnt mean anything. Just take the time to think about it ok.

Why would they give away a second movie by saying there is more than one monster.

MOVIES NEED TWISTS!!!

IE the thing that fell in the water.

Stop saying there is only one if there is NO SOLID PROOF.

There could be one there could be more than one. Just accept the fact.

Im not here to argue just want to state a valid point.

SO AGAIN I SAY THERE IS NO PROOF IN THE PUDDING.

Quote:
Well, you don't think there are any discrepancies. Others (obviously) would argue that point.


Exactly.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:40 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
tMan930
Unfettered


Joined: 25 Nov 2007
Posts: 458
Location: Up In There

econaz02 wrote:
Lung shits are fucking like black. Color is off.



I don't think that's a good point. In the up-close scene (Hud's demise) we see these thin membranes pop off of the side. They appear to be red or orange, most likely because the sun is shining directly on them. They could easily be flesh-colored or white or even mostly see-through, and so would appear black on the creature's head if whatever was underneath was black.

EDIT: For the record, I believe that the images of the toy are either of an uncomplete model, or (if it's supposed to be a creature depicted in the movie, and we're supposed to believe that) evidence of multiple creatures existing in the movie, simply because of the tail, and I'll say it over and over again.

Watch the bridge collapse. Something that is either a tail or a tentacle (definitely not one of the monster appendages shown on the toy) slams the bridge. People argued over this, some said that it must've been a "mother monster" with a tentacle, and the argument to that point was that it was the monster's tail. This toy does not have a big badass tail.

waddafuuuuck!

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:48 pm
Last edited by tMan930 on Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
econaz02
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 27

They look pretty Red to me. If there is something to agree on it would be that but who knows maybe you are right.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:52 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Nighthawk
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee


Joined: 14 Jul 2007
Posts: 4751
Location: Miami, Florida, USA, Earth

Quote:
Lung shits are fucking like black


Your'd be kinda black around the edges too if the military was firing missiles at you...

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 9:59 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
econaz02
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 27

^ I guees MGP took a quick bath for the HUD scene then.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:04 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
gigantis2001
Decorated


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 282
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Looks like most of the more intelligent members have been absent recently (no offense to the intelligent ones who haven't left). Sad

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 10:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
pegassissy
Unfettered

Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 552

[quote="econaz02"]SO AGAIN I SAY THERE IS NO PROOF IN THE PUDDING.[quote]
Ok im gonna make a list of all the proof for their being one monster and you make a list of all the proof pointing to the "fact" that there are multiple monsters.
1. Some THING has found us

2. The fact that Hasbro released only one monster prototype

3. The newscast does not mention multiple monsters

4. The monster's appreance is identicle throughout the entire film

5. No mention of a second monster ever

6. We never see the two monsters interact

7. The military says something along the lines of "we are going to take one more shot at IT, and then hammerdown"

Im still waiting for number one econaz02 or fenix.

EDIT to add: And yeah, where did the red walruses and mr. toastys and the ting angs go?
_________________
And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...


PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:09 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SlushomakesMEhappy
Decorated


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 164

econaz02 wrote:
The toy? If that toy is Accurate then there is a SERIOUOS problem and there is DEF. more than one monster. That thing look tottaly diffrent. Lung shits are fucking like black. Color is off.

Just cause I have little post's or I joined late doesnt mean anything. Just take the time to think about it ok.

Why would they give away a second movie by saying there is more than one monster.

MOVIES NEED TWISTS!!!

IE the thing that fell in the water.

Stop saying there is only one if there is NO SOLID PROOF.

There could be one there could be more than one. Just accept the fact.

Im not here to argue just want to state a valid point.

SO AGAIN I SAY THERE IS NO PROOF IN THE PUDDING.

Quote:
Well, you don't think there are any discrepancies. Others (obviously) would argue that point.


Exactly.
If there is two monsters, then why does Mat Reeves and JJ abrams, hell everyone who worked on it, keep saying

WE NEED OUR OWN MONSTER
YOU'LL SEE THE MONSTER IN DETAIL

Why do you think there is two again? Dude, your theory about there being two monsters almost sucks as much as my "It being Zilla" theory, THAT MEANS YOUR THEORY SUCKS.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
suckaH
Unfettered

Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 672

gigantis2001 wrote:
Looks like most of the more intelligent members have been absent recently (no offense to the intelligent ones who haven't left). Sad

It doesn't help that fenix and econaz lower the collective intelligence of the forum to that of a garden hose.

Stop saying there are discrepancies. There are absolutely none. The tail? Size fits...it's 25 stories tall on all fours, that's enormous when swimming stretched out. The color of the lungs? They are slightly translucent and the sun was shining through them, making them appear to glow. Wouldn't something light in color with the sun shining through them appear to be red/orange? Stop saying we have no solid proof. JJ saying that we need our own monster (not breed of monsterS) is proof enough.

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 12:10 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
econaz02
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 27

1. Clear shots of the monster?????? Wow you must have slow fucking vision man. Holy shit.

2. MUCH discrepency... The "TOY" has black lung things not red. As well as the scene right before the subway Scene. Camon camera angle my ass thats like comparing a match box to a fucking H1. Prototype. Where is the official word from Hasbro's?

3. I guees the fact that when people are nervous and scared they dont use the best choice in words. Do you think there going to say O MY GOD THERE IS EXACTLY 3 MONSTERS. No there going to say WOW its alive. They are certaintly not going to look at the thing and study it so that the next time they see it they can say o yeah your right that is him I just saw the birthmark under his left eye yep same monster lets continue on.

4. Seems odly funny how the monster ALWAYS seems to wind up were ever the group is. Hmm especially in that scene where you can see MGP before the planes pass the group on the roof of liz's place didnt look like a fucking T-Rex walking. Not saying it has any T-rex has anythign to do about just saying it looked like the same posture.

5. The tale looking thing that hit the bridge. WTF was that looked like a huge octopus tentacle which is no were to be found on this monster.

6. The subway scene WOW that thing looks like a bat when hud runs into the subway.

7. Mention a second monster and ruin the sequel. Ass.

8. Interact? WTF yeah I think they forgot there waters under the ocean. Ever thought that when they would make a sound like a roar that could be interaction?????? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... How do you think the first humans interacted????? Sounds..

9.
Quote:
we are going to take one more shot at IT


Maybe they killed one of them? And the other one is still alive and they didnt know while they were in the heat of the battle.

10. Why on the end of www.1-18-08.com would they blur this image out??? There is a sequel coming out so why would they show the one and only monster dead? Arent they making another live action one? I would love to see them document another day. That would be stupid. The point of a sequel is to explain not show more mayhem.



Like I said again. THERE IS NO 100% PROOF. 100000000% OPINIONS!

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:11 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 9 of 12 [179 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group