Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:23 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
[QUESTION] SPOILERWas it a nuke or some kind of bombardment?
View previous topicView next topic
Page 6 of 9 [126 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next
Author Message
Rjet
Boot

Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 53

it might of been a nuke.

there were sirens before the explosions, do they always sound the siren when they're just bombing? I would guess sirens would indicate some kind of hardcore bombing would be in progress.

ALSO about the whole electrionics magnets etc. That Video Camera is fkin BAD ASS. if it can survive throughout the whole damn movie without getting fked up.. . AT ALL.. then it should be able to handle a nuke or anything else.

just saying. .


summary.

badass camera survives nuke. Smile

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:21 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Master Shake
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 25

If I was the military guy in charge, I would've used an FAE. Obviously, MGP breathes oxygen, and the blast would suck all the air out of its lungs. I don't care how tough it is, if it can't breathe, it can't fight.

And by the way rjet, I agree that the camera is bad ass. It must've been made by Dodge, who were also responsible for the indestructible Ram pickup in "Twister". Very Happy

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Roe
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 58

After the Helicopter crash, I recall the radio cackles that the target is still active, and to initiate Hammerdown. Then something about DoT (I honestly couldn't figure out the letters) in 15 minutes.

Then it says that 2 minutes before Hammerdown goes into affect the air raid sirens will be going off. I couldn't hear a lot of the chatter, but something about if you hear the sirens you are in the blast area.

Does anyone remember what the letters were? Distruction of Target, or Drop on Target are my only two guesses, assuming DoT is right.

I've seen the movie a couple of times and still can't get those letters.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Angstfild
Boot

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 61

It was not, could not have been a nuclear device.

What do we know about such devices?

1) EMP at detonation. This would have alone destroyed the digitally recorded material and stopped the camera recording at the moment of detonation.
2) They are detonated at altitude.
3) Incineration at ground zero. With todays weapons I am sure complete anihilation and incineration would have encompassed the entire island.
4) Produce Fallout.

Fireballs from a nuclear blast occur after the initial release of heat and energy. We are talking about, at detonation, heat as intense as the sun at ground zero. Now how big is the island. A few miles long and wide. Any small nuclear device would totally wipe out the island.

The EMP from any size of device would destroy video on the camera even if it did survive the extreme heat cause by the nuclear blast and subsequent firestorm that would engulf central park. That is where they were after all and what does that mean? Kindling.

I tend to think the evacuation was so that they could save as many lives as possible. The military carpet bombed the entire island. Short of a nuke it is the only way to be moderately sure that MGP and the parasites were exterminated.

I honestly cannot see how anyone could deduce that a nuclear device was or would be used on our own soil. Fallout anyone? It would make the area unlivable for many, many decades and there is no telling where or how far the contamination could or would spread.

I seriously doubt a nuclear device of any size was used.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:36 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Angstfild
Boot

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 61

double post

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:43 pm
Last edited by Angstfild on Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Angstfild
Boot

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 61

One other thing. I am pretty tired of the " It's only a movie" and "It's Hollywood" arguements.

The movie was made to have some semblance of realism. The movie makers wanted us to become immersed in the lives and stories of those involved in the movie. They want us to suspend belief and pretend that these things could or did occur.

With that they made the movie as close to something as believable as possible in their creative minds. So to believe that a nuke was used and the SD survived is going a bit outside of even their imaginary box.

Yes it is a movie. Correct, it is not real. But for the sake of the game and enjoyment of the movie, we are to at least pretend that it happened.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:44 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Zaggs
Boot

Joined: 21 Jan 2008
Posts: 68

I would agree with everything Angstfild said. Unless for some reason whatever the bridge was made out of is the perfect resistor of EMP its not a nuke. It doesn't matter how well the camera is made, the circuit boards would fry. Also the soldier that advises them to get to Beth's tells them the last helicopter leaves at 0600, Hammer down is later to "level the island". I don't think he would say "level" if he knew it was "nuke". The space in between "wheels up" and "Hammer Down" is to make sure all the military troops are out of harms way. But they've had a few hours and they know not all civilians would have gotten out of Manhattan, hence the god help us. Then there is also the fact that on US soil you're going to escalate what you use to kill it. You're not going to jump to a nuke. My guess is carpet bombing with Fuel Air Explosives. Maybe that one B-2 was early, but it was only dropping "dumb" (no guidance) iron bombs. Or maybe it was the last escalation after the F-18's failed.
Course how the creature survived all this when the mother must be dead (if it is truly a baby) is beyond me.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:43 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
alptraum
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 15

Angstfild wrote:
One other thing. I am pretty tired of the " It's only a movie" and "It's Hollywood" arguements.

The movie was made to have some semblance of realism. The movie makers wanted us to become immersed in the lives and stories of those involved in the movie. They want us to suspend belief and pretend that these things could or did occur.

With that they made the movie as close to something as believable as possible in their creative minds. So to believe that a nuke was used and the SD survived is going a bit outside of even their imaginary box.

Yes it is a movie. Correct, it is not real. But for the sake of the game and enjoyment of the movie, we are to at least pretend that it happened.


I think it requires a whole lot less suspension of disbelief to think that an SD card could survive a nuclear blast of unkown size and altitude and range from Rob and Beth then it does to believe a giant monster attacked NYC.

As far as the them having no idea where or how far the contamination from fallout would go that you mentioned in your previous post, actually they would have a very good idea. Our government has spent tons of time and money studying that very thing. It wouldn't be %100, but they would have a good idea of what would happen.

I think the only clues we really have to work with are the dialog from the movie and maybe they way they handled the effects of the explosion(s) at the end.

I don't think you can just rule out nukes due to the SD card and your belief that the government would never nuke a US city.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:16 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheAirman
Boot

Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Misawa, Aomori, Japan

Even the smallest nuclear bomb would destroy all of NY, and devestate Jersey, so no. It wasn't a nuke. Too much at stake.

Hell, NY and it's people have been though enough in the past 8 years without DC deciding to destroy it completely. NYC is America's most important city (second most. My hometown of DC is the capitol FTW). A nuke doesn't make sense at all. You want to stop a monster, yes. But you do not want to cause even MORE damage to that much real estate when that much of the city is destoyed as it is.

Another reason why I think it wasn't a nuke? Because they found the camera in years or months. No residual radiation or fallout is going to dissipate that quickly at all.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:53 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TommyBoy84
Boot

Joined: 21 Oct 2007
Posts: 30

Roe,

When you speak of "DoT", I think they actually said "ToT" in the movie, which would be "time on target". I think they were just referring to when the bombing for Hammerdown would actually start.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:45 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
alptraum
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 15

Thats not true at all. The US and other countries as well have created MANY sizes of nuclear weapons. There are some that would not destroy all of NYC, much less wipe out New Jersey as well. I don't want to sound like a jerk, but you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the sizes of nuclear weapons and their effects. We have many weapons that fall well below the MT+ city killer range, as do some other countries.

As far as the timeline you mention them finding the camera in (years or months, or weeks as far as we know) protective suits can go a long way to surviving a radio active environment Smile

TheAirman wrote:
Even the smallest nuclear bomb would destroy all of NY, and devestate Jersey, so no. It wasn't a nuke. Too much at stake.

Hell, NY and it's people have been though enough in the past 8 years without DC deciding to destroy it completely. NYC is America's most important city (second most. My hometown of DC is the capitol FTW). A nuke doesn't make sense at all. You want to stop a monster, yes. But you do not want to cause even MORE damage to that much real estate when that much of the city is destoyed as it is.

Another reason why I think it wasn't a nuke? Because they found the camera in years or months. No residual radiation or fallout is going to dissipate that quickly at all.


PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:12 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheAirman
Boot

Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Misawa, Aomori, Japan

alptraum wrote:
Thats not true at all. The US and other countries as well have created MANY sizes of nuclear weapons. There are some that would not destroy all of NYC, much less wipe out New Jersey as well. I don't want to sound like a jerk, but you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the sizes of nuclear weapons and their effects. We have many weapons that fall well below the MT+ city killer range, as do some other countries.

As far as the timeline you mention them finding the camera in (years or months, or weeks as far as we know) protective suits can go a long way to surviving a radio active environment Smile



I meant to edit that. I got caught up in watching the movie.

But yeah, I don't want to sound like a jerk either, but until you've become certified in loading up munitions on a multi-role fighter in your nation's Air Force, then we can have a conversation, good sir. Until then, don't insult me please.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:19 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
alptraum
Boot

Joined: 20 Jan 2008
Posts: 15

TheAirman wrote:

I meant to edit that. I got caught up in watching the movie.

But yeah, I don't want to sound like a jerk either, but until you've become certified in loading up munitions on a multi-role fighter in your nation's Air Force, then we can have a conversation, good sir. Until then, don't insult me please.


I've never loaded munitions on a fighter, but I did spend some time at Whiteman in the 80's. So I'm no stranger to nukes Smile I'm sorry you felt I was insulting you, I certainly did not intend it that way. I was just commenting on your statement that any nuke would not only level NYC but New Jersey as well. Anybody very familiar with the US nuclear weapons arsenal would know we have plenty of stuff that has a much lower yield then that. Just looking at the FUFO b-61 can show that stuff can be dialed down pretty small. Small of course is somewhat relative when talking about nukes. But certainly well below the city killer range.

Just to reiterate, I did not intend to insult you. But I do think anyone really familiar with the US nuke arsenal would know that we have plenty of stuff that is much lower yield then what you are talking about.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:33 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Angstfild
Boot

Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 61

alptraum wrote:
Thats not true at all. The US and other countries as well have created MANY sizes of nuclear weapons. There are some that would not destroy all of NYC, much less wipe out New Jersey as well. I don't want to sound like a jerk, but you have no idea what you are talking about when it comes to the sizes of nuclear weapons and their effects. We have many weapons that fall well below the MT+ city killer range, as do some other countries.

As far as the timeline you mention them finding the camera in (years or months, or weeks as far as we know) protective suits can go a long way to surviving a radio active environment Smile


The results are the same no matter what size of nuke it is. It is the ammount of dmg inflicted depending on the size of the bomb. A 20kt bomb dropped directly on the monster would wipe out everything instantly within 1 mile. The resulting firestorm and buildings knocked down from the blast wave would be in an effective range no less than 3 miles. This in effect would wipe out much if not all of NYC.

The ground burst solution would create a crater about 650ft wide and 80 deep. Big enough for our monster to fall down into. IF it was an air burst there is no significant crater. The EMP created by even this small nuke would have destroyed the SD device. That in itself should be argument enough as to why a nuke was not used at the end of the movie.

Fallout would be more severe from a groundburst as well. Anything and everything in Manahattan would be radioactive and the actual area of effect might be greater due to other mitigating conditions.

So in closing....it was not a friggin nuke. Wink

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:44 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheAirman
Boot

Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 57
Location: Misawa, Aomori, Japan

alptraum wrote:

I've never loaded munitions on a fighter, but I did spend some time at Whiteman in the 80's. So I'm no stranger to nukes Smile I'm sorry you felt I was insulting you, I certainly did not intend it that way. I was just commenting on your statement that any nuke would not only level NYC but New Jersey as well. Anybody very familiar with the US nuclear weapons arsenal would know we have plenty of stuff that has a much lower yield then that. Just looking at the FUFO b-61 can show that stuff can be dialed down pretty small. Small of course is somewhat relative when talking about nukes. But certainly well below the city killer range.

Just to reiterate, I did not intend to insult you. But I do think anyone really familiar with the US nuke arsenal would know that we have plenty of stuff that is much lower yield then what you are talking about.



You had me all checkmate'd up there. I was thinking about the GBU-43 when I wrote that. That thing isn't even a nuke.

And you are right about the B-61. As a matter of fact, there are 6 books of stuff I have to learn (if I want to at least make SSgt, but I don't plan to stay in that long. At best I'll make SrA), including the ENTIRE FUCKIN ARSENAL and the B-61 was in there. You can dial the stuff. Crazy how that works.

I was so hard pressed on it not being a nuke that I didn't think, I guess. You won.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:52 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 6 of 9 [126 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: Cloverfield (1-18-08) » Cloverfield: General / Updates
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group