Author
Message
MrToasty
I Have 100 Cats and Smell of Wee
Joined: 03 Aug 2004 Posts: 4310 Location: Des Moines, IA
Euchre wrote:
It's a baby of an aggressive and predatory species, and as it came ashore it was just disoriented and like many kids - ready for some snacks.
It struck me that the scene with Hud getting munched was as much about curiosity as anything. It's very natural that babies chew on things as a way to learn and explore their world.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:39 pm
The Stray
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2007 Posts: 141
Hehe
needles wrote:
Yeah that makes lots of sense actually. I kept watching the guy who posted the video of good footage and when you see the monster getting bombed it looks like he's going "HEEEEY, CUT IT OUT MAN DX THAT'S NOT FAIR, I CAN'T REACH YOU GUYS" He just looks like a child that's being picked on. So it would make sense that they say this.
I can kind of see that.
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
And if it weren't for the fact that he was eating people right from the beginning and shedding creatures that bite you and cause you to explode I could see how it could all be a misunderstanding...
On the other hand. I just had a thought. If that's the BABY how big is the ADULT. Holy crap. THINK about that...
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:04 pm
TheSerenityOfSirens
Boot
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 43
theory... my final take on the whisper ive been thinking about this for a while. this is my final theory.
i believe that it is probable that the whisper at the end of the credits is PART of the tape recovered from the rubble. lets say rob survived. hypothetically. im guessing he was knocked out for a good period of time. when he came to maybe he heard or saw the monster and said "its still alive"
im aware that there is no explanation for the reversal. i am aware that the tape was running out (or some have said DID run out) but i believe it to be a good theory. tear me up and pick apart my theory. i do want to hear your opinions.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:10 pm
Ghidra99
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jan 2008 Posts: 127
eliwein wrote:
Dude, wouldn't that be awesome, if Matt Reeves wrote himself into the story? Kinda like in The Dark Tower series, where
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Stephen King becomes a real character, and not even just a random writer named Stephen King, but the writer of the very story he's in.
Sorry, but that wasn't cool at all. I thought King ruined The Dark Tower by doing that.
I'm still firmly in the camp that the audio at the end of the movie was intended to imply that Rob possibly survived and also to paint the fact that there will be a sequel.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:43 pm
Euchre
uF Game Warden
Joined: 29 Aug 2007 Posts: 3342
MrToasty wrote:
Euchre wrote:
It's a baby of an aggressive and predatory species, and as it came ashore it was just disoriented and like many kids - ready for some snacks.
It struck me that the scene with Hud getting munched was as much about curiosity as anything. It's very natural that babies chew on things as a way to learn and explore their world.
Good point, but I was more speaking about the folks he was munching on that Marlena spoke of. I mean to say that his desire to eat people wasn't vengeful or calculated, just a case of 'the munchies'.
_________________Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:26 pm
Anteros
Unfettered
Joined: 13 Jul 2007 Posts: 451 Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Ghidra99 wrote:
eliwein wrote:
Dude, wouldn't that be awesome, if Matt Reeves wrote himself into the story? Kinda like in The Dark Tower series, where
Spoiler (Rollover to View):
Stephen King becomes a real character, and not even just a random writer named Stephen King, but the writer of the very story he's in.
Sorry, but that wasn't cool at all. I thought King ruined The Dark Tower by doing that.
I'm still firmly in the camp that the audio at the end of the movie was intended to imply that Rob possibly survived and also to paint the fact that there will be a sequel.
So they found the camera in Central Park but they didn't find the two bodies lying next to it? Meaning Rob and Beth got away?
Or they DID find the bodies next to the camera and those words were the last ones Rob spoke.
Sequel, either way. Just not NYC again, please.
_________________.
Beware of Geeks bearing Gifs.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:28 pm
Zaggs
Boot
Joined: 21 Jan 2008 Posts: 68
penguin-1203 wrote:
can anyone send me the link to the original, untouched sound file? i can reverse it myself, but i would like tp pick at it my self.
Take Jdev's first file and use "goldwave"'s demo (free) which can reverse it.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:19 pm
Halcyon
Greenhorn
Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Posts: 7
rob and beth live or die/whisper Whos to say that rob and beth weren't with the camera when it was found. The only thing we can rule out is that they didn't bring it to the military. They could have been dead with the camera or just found in a rescue party and the camera was taken. And if they WERE alive then that means it could have been robs voice at the very end.[/list]
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:23 pm
h311b3nt
Decorated
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 271 Location: OC
Euchre wrote:
I mean to say that his desire to eat people wasn't vengeful or calculated, just a case of 'the munchies'.
Case of the munchies...I thought his eyes looked a little dillated. MGP is a STONER!
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:28 pm
skizzott
Greenhorn
Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 3
The 'whisper' at the end was a walkie talkie (or whatever type of radio the military uses) communication. It's mentioned in the article in the OP.
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:22 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 1 Week 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending