Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
  

The time now is Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:42 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)		 View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Low-Volume Games
[ALADGYMA] Aladygma and the 00|11|22|88 Mystery (trailhead)
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 43 [639 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ..., 41, 42, 43  Next
Author Message
TinyGreenJedi
Greenhorn

Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 9

 		Everyone's been trying to rearrange these numbers into a date, like 11-28-2008, or 12-18-2008, or 10-12-2088. But what if it's just the date of Cloverfield I (1-18-2008), with an extra "2" to signify that it's Cloverfield II.
Okay, the more I explain this to myself, the more of a stretch it seems.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:00 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
I'M HUGE!
Decorated


Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 215
Location: U.S. 447
The Stray wrote:
TinyGreenJedi wrote:
I've been keeping up with the forums diligently for forever now, and haven't felt the need to post anything til now.
Just thought I'd throw out the fact that another way to arrange the numbers "00-11-22-88" is as "1-18-2008: 2". As in the sequel to the movie we refered to as 1-18-08 for the longest time.
Just a thought. Don't hit me.


What?

00:11:22:88 = 1-18-08: 2

How? It's quite complicated, but try to follow me on this.

00:11:22:88

1. Replace the first 0 with the first 1, thus creating:
10:01:22:88

2. With that, replace the 2nd 0 with the 2nd 1
11:00:22:88

3. Put the first 8 where the 1st 1 used to be.
11:80:22:08

4. Next, place the 2 after the 8, and move every number that used to be before the 2 up.
11:82:20:08

5. Put the last 2 at the end.
11:82:00:82

6. If done correctly, this should be interpreted as 1-18-2008: 2.
_________________
Your retarted.

An anagram for JJ Abrams is Cloverfield. Shocked

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:15 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chrizzy
Unfettered


Joined: 20 Nov 2007
Posts: 611
Location: Halifax, NS
TinyGreenJedi wrote:
Everyone's been trying to rearrange these numbers into a date, like 11-28-2008, or 12-18-2008, or 10-12-2088. But what if it's just the date of Cloverfield I (1-18-2008), with an extra "2" to signify that it's Cloverfield II.
Okay, the more I explain this to myself, the more of a stretch it seems.


Meh. It's about as likely as the following:

00-11-22-88 -> 00+11+22+88 = 121 -> 121 = 11 x 11

Therefore, Cloverfield 2 ("Aladygma"??) will come out the 11th day of the 11th month... November 11th.
Ta-da.

Too bad that's a tuesday and not a friday. Although (hold on to your butts), November 11th will be a friday in...wait for it...2011!!!

Yeah, 'bout as likely as that.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:17 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
The Stray
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 141
I'M HUGE! wrote:
The Stray wrote:
TinyGreenJedi wrote:
I've been keeping up with the forums diligently for forever now, and haven't felt the need to post anything til now.
Just thought I'd throw out the fact that another way to arrange the numbers "00-11-22-88" is as "1-18-2008: 2". As in the sequel to the movie we refered to as 1-18-08 for the longest time.
Just a thought. Don't hit me.


What?

00:11:22:88 = 1-18-08: 2

How? It's quite complicated, but try to follow me on this.

00:11:22:88

1. Replace the first 0 with the first 1, thus creating:
10:01:22:88

2. With that, replace the 2nd 0 with the 2nd 1
11:00:22:88

3. Put the first 8 where the 1st 1 used to be.
11:80:22:08

4. Next, place the 2 after the 8, and move every number that used to be before the 2 up.
11:82:20:08

5. Put the last 2 at the end.
11:82:00:82

6. If done correctly, this should be interpreted as 1-18-2008: 2.


Oh. I see it now. Well, if it is IG they're starting on a significantly more challenging path...

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069

 		I think it's Aladdin of the future.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
I'M HUGE!
Decorated


Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 215
Location: U.S. 447
The Stray wrote:
I'M HUGE! wrote:
The Stray wrote:
TinyGreenJedi wrote:
I've been keeping up with the forums diligently for forever now, and haven't felt the need to post anything til now.
Just thought I'd throw out the fact that another way to arrange the numbers "00-11-22-88" is as "1-18-2008: 2". As in the sequel to the movie we refered to as 1-18-08 for the longest time.
Just a thought. Don't hit me.


What?

00:11:22:88 = 1-18-08: 2

How? It's quite complicated, but try to follow me on this.

00:11:22:88

1. Replace the first 0 with the first 1, thus creating:
10:01:22:88

2. With that, replace the 2nd 0 with the 2nd 1
11:00:22:88

3. Put the first 8 where the 1st 1 used to be.
11:80:22:08

4. Next, place the 2 after the 8, and move every number that used to be before the 2 up.
11:82:20:08

5. Put the last 2 at the end.
11:82:00:82

6. If done correctly, this should be interpreted as 1-18-2008: 2.


Oh. I see it now. Well, if it is IG they're starting on a significantly more challenging path...

This ARG just gets harder and harder as we go along the path, no?
_________________
Your retarted.

An anagram for JJ Abrams is Cloverfield. Shocked

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:24 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
SlushomakesMEhappy
Decorated


Joined: 16 Feb 2008
Posts: 164

 		JJ abrams and george lucas. Wow heaven on earth.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:29 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Patrick Star
Unfettered


Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 409
Location: Oregon

 		http://www.tidowave.org/

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:39 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
xboyonfirex
Entrenched


Joined: 05 Dec 2007
Posts: 1069
SlushomakesMEhappy wrote:
JJ abrams and george lucas. Wow heaven on earth.


that is scary... all that's missing are Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson and the cinematic media world would go into a global 'fuck-fest' over that.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:41 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Kraker
Unfettered

Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 749
Patrick Star wrote:
http://www.tidowave.org/


To be honest, it's not hard to tell when a site is definitely ingame. Tidowave was ingame because it was simply registered before the hack, which rendered the coincidence virtually impossible.

The only evidence supporting this so far is that someone emailed a guy about it and a fishy looking website and a fishy looking video popped up on the internet.

None of it is conclusive. The video is identical to that of Cloverfield except for a name change. That makes it mores suspicious. We knew the stuff on youtube was real because it was new. If it was just a remix of the trailer we would dub it OOG.

There is only evidence pointing that it's OOG, and no evidence prooving or suggesting it's ingame.

At least don't discuss it in a forum dedicated to cloverfield. If you want that ARG to continue because you're bored, suggest it here:

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/index.php?f=140

Oh, and:

gigantis2001 wrote:
TP516 wrote:
Kraker.
you're an obnoxious bastard.


Jeez, lay offa him. First you call him a "Kraker" (yes, I know it's his name, but still), then you call him an obnoxious bastard.

I'll admit that I don't agree with his reasoning, but all he's saying is that he thinks it's OOG. As do I, by the way. He isn't making fun of any of you, or saying "if you think this is in-game, you are a dickless fuck" or anything like that.

Unless you thought he was calling you a "kraker." Then, I guess I'd understand.

Otherwise, just try'n relax.


Thank you. Some people do not realize when I am arguing a point and when I am being an "obnoxious bastard". And if I am an obnoxious bastard to you, chances are you're a troll.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:51 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
The Stray
Veteran

Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 141
Kraker wrote:
Patrick Star wrote:
http://www.tidowave.org/


To be honest, it's not hard to tell when a site is definitely ingame. Tidowave was ingame because it was simply registered before the hack, which rendered the coincidence virtually impossible.

The only evidence supporting this so far is that someone emailed a guy about it and a fishy looking website and a fishy looking video popped up on the internet.

None of it is conclusive. The video is identical to that of Cloverfield except for a name change. That makes it mores suspicious. We knew the stuff on youtube was real because it was new. If it was just a remix of the trailer we would dub it OOG.

There is only evidence pointing that it's OOG, and no evidence prooving or suggesting it's ingame.

At least don't discuss it in a forum dedicated to cloverfield. If you want that ARG to continue because you're bored, suggest it here:

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/index.php?f=140

Oh, and:

gigantis2001 wrote:
TP516 wrote:
Kraker.
you're an obnoxious bastard.


Jeez, lay offa him. First you call him a "Kraker" (yes, I know it's his name, but still), then you call him an obnoxious bastard.

I'll admit that I don't agree with his reasoning, but all he's saying is that he thinks it's OOG. As do I, by the way. He isn't making fun of any of you, or saying "if you think this is in-game, you are a dickless fuck" or anything like that.

Unless you thought he was calling you a "kraker." Then, I guess I'd understand.

Otherwise, just try'n relax.


Thank you. Some people do not realize when I am arguing a point and when I am being an "obnoxious bastard". And if I am an obnoxious bastard to you, chances are you're a troll.


In any event, until you can prove it's not, there's no need to attempt to start an entire forum over it. So THAT suggestion is out.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:54 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Caerwiden
Unfettered


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 651

 		Re: Slow Your Roll
Kraker wrote:


I just don't like the idea of people being tricked. Sure this forum may be inactive but it doesn't mean we should get the wrong kind of activity.
Quote:

It's not 'obviously' OOG and even if it is OOG it doesn't matter because we might get a new game out of this.


Um, nope. It's quite obviously OOG. All the factors so far point to it.


Um, nope. sorry. Unless you have more info than everyone else does it's not obvious at all.

It's unlikely to be IG, sure, but it doesn't matter if we get a new game out of it.
_________________
Are you sure you want to delete these messages?
Yes No

*click*

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:03 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
pegassissy
Unfettered

Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 552

 		sorry, broke flow of conversation.
_________________
And then the nurse comes round and everyone will lift their heads
But I'm thinking of what Sarah said, "Love is watching someone die"
So who's going to watch you die?...

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:19 pm
Last edited by pegassissy on Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TP516
Decorated

Joined: 19 Jan 2008
Posts: 211
Location: Boston, MA
Kraker wrote:
Patrick Star wrote:
http://www.tidowave.org/


To be honest, it's not hard to tell when a site is definitely ingame. Tidowave was ingame because it was simply registered before the hack, which rendered the coincidence virtually impossible.

The only evidence supporting this so far is that someone emailed a guy about it and a fishy looking website and a fishy looking video popped up on the internet.

None of it is conclusive. The video is identical to that of Cloverfield except for a name change. That makes it mores suspicious. We knew the stuff on youtube was real because it was new. If it was just a remix of the trailer we would dub it OOG.

There is only evidence pointing that it's OOG, and no evidence prooving or suggesting it's ingame.

At least don't discuss it in a forum dedicated to cloverfield. If you want that ARG to continue because you're bored, suggest it here:

http://forums.unfiction.com/forums/index.php?f=140

Oh, and:

gigantis2001 wrote:
TP516 wrote:
Kraker.
you're an obnoxious bastard.


Jeez, lay offa him. First you call him a "Kraker" (yes, I know it's his name, but still), then you call him an obnoxious bastard.

I'll admit that I don't agree with his reasoning, but all he's saying is that he thinks it's OOG. As do I, by the way. He isn't making fun of any of you, or saying "if you think this is in-game, you are a dickless fuck" or anything like that.

Unless you thought he was calling you a "kraker." Then, I guess I'd understand.

Otherwise, just try'n relax.


Thank you. Some people do not realize when I am arguing a point and when I am being an "obnoxious bastard". And if I am an obnoxious bastard to you, chances are you're a troll.


Kraker - you have NO PROOF that it's out of game.

it's still on the table for debate/discussion.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:19 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
intersect
Entrenched


Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 882
Location: Gainesville, FL

 		Actually, theres NO evidence at all, IG or OOG. The site itself has scant info. Besides, what the hell else do we have to talk about. I mean, you just have to look at the depth of the analyzation of the MGP toy to realize that we have a little extra time on our hands...

PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 43 [639 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ..., 41, 42, 43  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Low-Volume Games
Jump to:  


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group