Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Wed Nov 13, 2024 10:59 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
[RING][MISSIONS] Solve the puzzle of the wave forms
View previous topicView next topic
Page 5 of 7 [94 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
Counslr200
Greenhorn

Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 8

I'm a newbie to this ARG stuff, but I couldn't help but be immersed in this once I started looking at it.

Does anyone know anything about "wave function collapse?"

From what I've read on wiki, it can "correspond to the receipt of new information."

I couldn't help but look at the graph and think that the whole thing "collapsed" in 1815.

Could this result from a new discovery in quantum physics in 1815 resulting in a "collapse?"

I may be totally off the wall on this as I got a D in physics in college, but in 1815 was there any discoveries or assumptions that changed in physics to cause a different set of assumptions?

I also noted that 1815 was the end of the first Kondratieff Wave upswing (1780-1815), whatever that means.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 6:30 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
brodie
Decorated


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 185
Location: Bathurst, Australia

Hey, this may be a silly question and a redundant one, but...

What question are we asking to get the responses 'yes' and 'no' in the waveforms?



Also. In the graph? 1x10^11 = radio wave frequencies. And also waveforms? Can - apparently - convert to sound waves. Anyone thinking along the lines that deciphering the waveforms may give us the ability to communicate between 'worlds'?
_________________
Find the Lost Ring - "and if we all fail, it's nice to know we have at least .000000001% chance of surviving" (elizabeth123)

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:46 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Media-Wolf
Boot


Joined: 02 Apr 2008
Posts: 13

Hey,

Brodie I think you've got the right idea here's my thoughts and issues with it though. (of course I could be blowing smoke here)
Any type of waveform could be used to generate a sound, however from what I've seen of this puzzle so far (very little I'm planning on catching up on the weekend) we don't have near enough information to generate a wave of sufficient complexity in order to create a noise.
For example an extremly tinny sounding recording would be about 8kbs that's 8x8x1000 binary digits per full second of audio and as i mentioned it would be distorted.
My other issue is that currently we don't have a wave form we have a "tree structured chart" (for lack of a btter term). My back ground is A/V so as soon as i get a chance (friday or saturday) I'm going to try a few things. I'm thinking that the audio path could be possible if we use one wave to modulate the other and essentialy stack them to get a fifth more complexe wave.
Also want to look into frequency modulation and amplitude modulation,however first need to actually get a real "wave form".
I'm thinking that if the trees each point to a different wave on the Omphi-puter then those are the actual wave's we should be using to crack this.(yet again this is just going by what I've read on here so far though)
Waves can display a whole load of data, audio, video, electricity, movement any form of plottable chart really.
Lastly, I might be being a bit naive, but the reason I think the audio or (really inprobable) video route looks so good is that they've refered to it as a "wave form". Every broadcasting facality has a device called "wave form" monitor because of the number of signals that we use. I'm un-aware of other sectors refuring to a "wave form". More commonly you'd just call it a graph, chart or maybe just a "wave".

Let me know your thoughts on this! Smile

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:33 pm
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
DavFlamerock
Entrenched


Joined: 11 Oct 2006
Posts: 937
Location: H2Oville, ME, USA

I think Brodie wasn't saying "this IS a message from another world" but rather "this is how messages are transferred, through omphaputers like this one."

I figure what we've got is ambient waves that are escaping through. Obviously if we were to receive a message it'd be huge. And long. And I don't want to think about trying to decode that.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:13 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chid12
Boot


Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 60

Chapters 12 and 14 really help to explain the graph. Hopefully Chapter 13 will explain it even further.

It looks like the number of the y-axis is the number of universes/worlds. Worlds are created whenever a decision of some sort is made, and are destroyed by a Quick Continental Change (QCC), when the continents re-arrange themselves rapidly (ie the tectonic plates shift and earthquakes/volcanoes occur as a result). Since there is an upper limit of world (I'm guessing around 100 billion based on the scale of the y-axis), there is a massive QCC whenever that number is approached.

But that would imply that there was a massive earthquake in 1815, but there wasn't. Or at least, no more massive than would be expected. Bigger earthquakes have happened since.

I still can't understand why the graph keeps changing and the lines change colour. Surely everything that's happened before 2008 would stay the same, whatever happened afterwards?

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:35 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
brodie
Decorated


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 185
Location: Bathurst, Australia

So that would mean, on the graph, that being near the top is bad - too many worlds in the multiverse and an ultimate collapse is near - and near the bottom is good. That would definitely explain 1815, the earthquake eruption of Mt. Tambora, in the case of the QCC. But in the long haul, QCCs kill people, and it's easier - or healthier - to synchronise worlds.

Hey! That's what the visions are about! Micha's (and Diego's?) visions about terrible things! If the worlds aren't synchrohnised and kept in balance so that the ultimate collapse isn't reached, then a QCC occurs - Micha's (and Diego's) world disasters!

PS. The graph is doing funny business again at 2008. Check it out.



From the looks of it, they all swoosh back and down a bit before dropping - except for blue, which goes up before dropping. Wish we knew what the colours represented. Maybe the different types of worlds? Definitely looks like there's six from this screenshot. How are we supposed to know which one's which, though?
_________________
Find the Lost Ring - "and if we all fail, it's nice to know we have at least .000000001% chance of surviving" (elizabeth123)

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:47 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
VictorSueiro
Decorated


Joined: 06 Mar 2008
Posts: 229

I think that there is a reference to the sacred wave form #2 in chapter

Quote:
The majority of the insignificant decisions lead to the same result. If a leaf falls down in the land or not, or if a fish not upstream or downstream at all, or if a proton turns to the left or the right, all these insignificant differences are precisely the same result across the time. As result, it is not necessary that multiple worlds represent both possible results. The reality can bring together the multiple branches that it created to join multiple results in an alone branch.



Yes
No Yes
Yes

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:20 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Elizabeth123
Decorated


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 285

Ariadne recently added figuring out the meaning of the RUN GRAPH screen as a Sofia task:

Quote:
When you type "run graph" into the omphaputer, it shows a really weird graph that runs from the year 1800 to 2008, and has Schroedinger's equation on top.

The graph seems to change occasionally to show a different set of data. But then it flickers back to "normal".

What do the seven lines mean, why are they shown in logarithmic scale, and what does Schroedinger have to do with it?

If anyone can figure out the secret meaning of the flickering run graph, it's you guys, Sofia.


So she's calling the original screen we saw "normal." There's something going on in the other worlds that makes them collapse periodically? Or is the 2008 plot point that's going up and down really expressing something that's going to happen in the future and not the present?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:30 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
brodie
Decorated


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 185
Location: Bathurst, Australia

Yay! I was already working on this. Totes predicted it'd be one of Sofia's tasks. Very Happy
_________________
Find the Lost Ring - "and if we all fail, it's nice to know we have at least .000000001% chance of surviving" (elizabeth123)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:41 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Counslr200
Greenhorn

Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 8

It's been reported that the graph started moving backwards after proceeding along and then collapsed.

Why doesn't the bar drag past 2008? Afterall, we're a third of the way into 2008. So is the end of graph 1/1/2008 and the graph reaches 1/1/08 and then moves back into 2007 and then collapses? Or is the collapse in current time.

It's interesting to note that currently, at the extreme right side of the graph, there are 2 points for each colored line due to the graph moving backwards.

That did not appear to be the case in late 1814.

Could the dual points mean there are currently 2 different sets of realities or universes?

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 10:55 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Elizabeth123
Decorated


Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 285

Oy...My brain is hurting. No idea what's going on with the shift backwards to make 2 points for each line.

You know, it may be that whatever happenied in 1814-1815 happened in other worlds, which then collapsed into our own world, so we wouldn't have noticed anything going on. It's not very logical from a Meta perspective (why wouldn't the PM's link it to something we could find out about?) but maybe it's because there haven't been any super-huge land shifts in several thousands of years, and they didn't want to extend the graph that far.

Here's a summary Dante put onto the forum:
Quote:
1) Original: Lines start high, something happens around 1815, they plunge down and then slowly rise back up towards 2008

2) Change 1: Lines start high, something happens around 1815, they plunge down and then stay down, sinking further towards 2008

3) Original-plus: Lines start high, something happens around 1815, they plunge down and then slowly rise back up towards 2008 except now at the very end they suddenly sink down again.


And now we have:
4) Lines gradually rise, but then swoosh and double-back on themselves.

We also should note that for some reason we had 7 lines for graphs 1 and 2, 5 lines for graph 3, and now 6 lines for graph 4.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:12 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
danteIL
Unfictologist


Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1990

Elizabeth123 wrote:
We also should note that for some reason we had 7 lines for graphs 1 and 2, 5 lines for graph 3, and now 6 lines for graph 4.


I don't think this is true -- I just think that some of the lines have just been almost exactly on top of each other. You can tell this because the resulting color is almost a blend of the two lines that combine. I think that there are always 7 lines:

6 colored lines: red, orange, purple, light blue, dark blue, green
plus one white line

My current SPEC given our new documents is that the white line represents the sum of the other 6 lines and also represents the sum total of alternate worlds that have been created over time (hence the crash in 1815 when this line reaches that upper limit - earthquakes happen and such). Each of the other 6 lines represents the number of worlds in that particular "classification" of world, as described in the SanFran document.

EDIT: this doesn't explain at least two things:
1) why the graph is now going backwards and such

2) why the number of worlds is represented by lambda, if this also supposed to be wavelength.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:26 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

here's something I don't think anybody's caught or mentioned - the 6 colours appear to match up with the 6 FTLR sites...

red - markus
orange - larissa
purple - meihui
light blue - noriko
dark blue - ariadne
green - diego

grey could either be a function of the 6 lines, or maybe it could be "Theo"
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:45 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
brodie
Decorated


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 185
Location: Bathurst, Australia

thebruce wrote:
here's something I don't think anybody's caught or mentioned - the 6 colours appear to match up with the 6 FTLR sites...

red - markus
orange - larissa
purple - meihui
light blue - noriko
dark blue - ariadne
green - diego

grey could either be a function of the 6 lines, or maybe it could be "Theo"


i. Which one's the grey line? The one at the top? I thought it was white.

ii. Larissa isn't one of the six. Lucie is, though.

That's a good catch! Let's keep an eye on this theory.
_________________
Find the Lost Ring - "and if we all fail, it's nice to know we have at least .000000001% chance of surviving" (elizabeth123)

PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:51 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

correction: rather than representing agonothetai, or bloggers, perhaps the strengths - each of the bloggers are associated with a strength, maybe this helps us associate a colour with each strength.

grey/white, same thing Wink
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:53 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 5 of 7 [94 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » ARG: Find the Lost Ring
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group