unforum

[Crucifixation]

I don't think that we should elect definite leaders as of yet. We seem to be coping well as of now without a definite structure, why change? What good would it for us to have leaders?

I think we are fine as long as everyone is kept on the same page and working towards the same objective, which is to ensure BEX's survival.

[Jacks]

I agree. The minute we start picking "leaders" is the minute we could really fracture the group.

[Lunsford]

I also agree that choosing leaders will create more problems than it could solve...

[ponie]

I think as long as everyone is on the same page and communicating as a team we should be ok. Maybe Doc is trying to create a situation that could divide us. If a group wants a "Lead" in the group and the other part of the group doesn't this could cause a bit of chaos.

[Ursos]

Thanks for the desteg info - I must have missed it in one of the 12 dozen places info gets posted.

I definitely agree that we don't really need a leader. What other ARG have you played that has had a definitive leader to it? I don't see why it would be neccessary at all.

[jelloarm]

Or he seems to think that our mob tactics aren't efficient enough to complete his tasks. Which hasn't proven true so far, but he probably has a better idea of what's to come than we do. We should ponder the idea objectively. Could we react better with a leader to organize? It's the same philosophy as having generals to an army, but it would only work as long as we respected the authority.

And I kind of disagree. I think certain players, namely Esteed if I had to just pick one, have been stand-out at guiding other players and keeping an overlying idea of what's going on. Just because we haven't had a vote about it doesn't mean that we don't have a leader.

[Nighthawk]

Wanna *really* piss off the Doc? Pick ME as a leader!

Actually, I'm not to keen on that idea myself either. He's dying to have us tear each other apart on our own.

[Jacks]

I personally think that's why he mentioned it in the first place.

[Crucifixation]

UPDATE

Seems like we will be given an "official" task soon.

[ponie]

Everyone shares infor. freely and there is always someone to help out if someone has a question. Being a newby everyone has been very helpful. There are plenty of people that bring something to the table. How would you pick a "leader" with sooooo many people from soooo many different places in time and space-------

Picking a "leader" could destract us from helping out Bex. Just a thought.

[Coffeebean]

What does it mean when it says Google[bot] on H2h logged in? There was a Yahoo[bot] there yesterday. Is it collecting all of our email addys?

[Esteed]

Picking leaders is pointless as long as we're all working towards the same goal. We seem to be doing well enough for now, I agree that we should leave it as is. If we end up needing leaders later, we can easily select some. Until then, I think having a definite "leader" would create too much problem. After all, the leader can't be expected to function entirely by him/herself, so he/she would need an inner circle, thus creating a greater division among the playerbase. Which, unless I missed my guess, is exactly what Doc is trying to do.

[Saint Cad]

New Note fom Doc

Looks like we're going to have a new task soon. Hope everyone is on their toes.

[Tresbien]

Coffeebean, the bots cruise around specific websites gathering information that's used for search terms in their search engines.

ETA: It's interesting that the doc calls it the first official task. I guess the others were tests.

[Crucifixation]

I will probably need to crash in a couple of hours. It's 0130 here. I do hope whatever Doc plans to do, he can do it soon. I have a feeling that this task will require quite a bit of man power.

Scavenger hunt? I am in.