unforum

texel · Guest

wrong avenue

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 7:20 pm

epicauthor · Greenhorn Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 8

And that helps how....

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 7:24 pm

Guest · Guest

well that clears things up

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 7:27 pm

Dr Wily · Boot Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 43

I'M OVER IT

I'll just find out about it tomorrow

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 7:55 pm

enidcoleslaw · Boot Joined: 03 Oct 2003 Posts: 22 Location: Virginia

Re: name

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 8:38 pm

GOD · Guest

TROUT

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 8:54 pm

GOD · Guest

*ROTFLMAO*

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:09 pm

Monki

texcellent

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:25 pm

_________________
--((Insert insanely vague literary text here))--

yanka

Monki,
Someone found some stuff in one of the mp3's here. It looks a lot like like texel's binary, i.e. nonsense. However, given that I am soooo gullible Embarassed

, I am not completely ready to decide that this (= a few posts up) was not Texel.

Have no idea what to do with these translations. I tried it in various fonts, and it returns the same box-characters, which means I don't have the right fonts (?). Or, MORE LIKELY, that I am lame to even consider that it's really texel Embarassed

.

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:34 pm

_________________
Annushka has already bought the sunflower oil, and has not only bought it, but has already spilled it.

L'Maut · Boot Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 22

I went on a limb and considered that 64 might reference I Ching (64 hexagrams and it can be thought of as an ancestor -- or, at least, a predecessor -- of modern binary), but iching, i ching, and i_ching didn't work.

Neither did leibniz nor dyadik. Nor DNA (64 triplets).

And I think I've nearly exhausted my Beatles related guesses.

Edit: I hate stretched screens.

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 9:57 pm

Monki

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:01 pm

_________________
--((Insert insanely vague literary text here))--

GOD · Guest

redirect

**Posted:** Fri Oct 10, 2003 10:16 pm

Dr Wily · Boot Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 43

Okay, here's something worth at least a moment's consideration:

When 'texel's binary was first posted, it was a continuous string, no returns.
Now it has been segmented into lines, obviously by a forum mod, by why? Because it was screwing up the margins (which it was) or to clarify it?

Either way, it would be nice to be given some kind of indication whether or not the post is worth further consideration, possibly by someone who can look at the poster's IP...just because it isn't ASCII doesn't mean there's not information in it.

//edit: the other thing is, I wouldn't be surprised if we suddenly got a little hint like this....we have been profoundly stumped all day, and this is a big day in-game.

**Posted:** Sat Oct 11, 2003 12:50 am

Dr Wily · Boot Joined: 07 Oct 2003 Posts: 43

On further examination I'm pretty sure it's random 1s and 0s....way too many clumps of '111' and '000'; evidence of furiously hitting two keys on a keyboard over and over again, possibly while laughing dumbly and drooling.

Just a thought, that last part.

**Posted:** Sat Oct 11, 2003 1:10 am

thebizrock · Boot Joined: 08 Oct 2003 Posts: 18

Possible Clue

**Posted:** Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:40 am