unforum

[Twiler]

I noticed this, but I haven't done anything with it.

I wouldn't call what I did random guessing; I was lucky to find the start-point, but from there on I was exploiting the weaknesses of the system.

[WolfHawk]

[Twiler]

[pancito]

Re: Not Over Yet!

[AzureWolf]

I wonder what it is then? Could it be an accident? Or more likely an Easter Egg?

Also i thought I'd point out that, even though I too thought that the first and last strings were identical, they aren't.

7C47DF7D1 / 044051411 / 1C47DF7DF / 7C47DF7C1

However C47DF7 does appear in 3 of the 4.

Ciphers aren't really my thing so I'll let someone else figure out what all that means, if anything.

[bigEdog]

It may be of note that the code:
98 21 18 82 31 67

appears in Jessica's blog numbers:
44 21 84 16 33 02
36 14 18 79 22 63
98 28 06 19 59 42
67 49 96 01 18 67
19 87 34 66 31 17
35 09 32 73 45 91
30 85 33 44 56 98
25 73 82 70 78 33
67 72 42 82 55 99
88 65 71 62 15 17
13 51 53 04 17 12
56 54 60 28 60 05

Not sure what that would mean though...

[Coffeebean]

[kolixela]

http://netzreport.googlepages.com/online_converter_for_numerals.html

fond a nice converter. auto converts any base into ANYTHING else. from base 2 to base 36

and is there any way to get 312954 out of anything else we have encountered?

that would have been the code on her number string to get the access page.