unforum

[labfly]

gamasutra interview with Adriana Skarped

[konamouse]

Re: gamasutra interview with Adriana Skarped

[krystyn]

Many people do not know this, but I was the first person to combine peanut butter and chocolate into a tasty snack.

[notgordian]

Wow, krystyn, you invented Peanut Butter Twix?

[krystyn]

Y-yes!

[labfly]

i totally agree, kona. it's strange to me that you would dive into this genre of storytelling and not know about "beast" and "bees" and "lockjaw". like if someone were to make a movie for the first time, you would study previous works (especially some of the very successful works) before you begin the production. maybe that's just the artist in me. i think its important to learn all you can about the craft. oh well. they did manage create a really great cross-media story.

and krystyn, aren't you also responsible for the classic old school reeses p-butter choco cup?

[konamouse]

Who is Adriana?

[labfly]

one of the designers and performers behind "the truth about marika"


http://www.thecompanyp.com/site/?page_id=7

[krystyn]

I inscribed 1's and 0's upon the pb-choco cups, and lo, it was summer, and lo, my game never launched.

It was a good game, too. You woulda liked it.

[Nighthawk]

[krystyn]

I think she might've been referring to interactions such as this:

[konamouse]

In a movie the relationship is all between the actors and the director, the audience is passive and has limited involvement. Their interaction with the movie is one-sided, their interaction amongst eachother is perhaps one of "ooh, that was good" or "damn, that sucked". They go their separate ways after the show. Poof!

In the theatre, it's much the same, albeit there is opportunity for interaction between audience and characters (depending on the venue/the author/the director/the type of show). However, Improv is a great example of relationships built with actors/audience and even amonst the audience/audience. And the audience helps create the CF that appears on the stage. This is quite close to much of what makes ARGs fun for me - the live interaction, the response of the actors to the suggestions of the audience (much like how players interact with ARG characters and can turn the story). But after the show, people still go their separate ways.

ARG/CF has built communities the exist beyond the show. Characters may or may not engage with the audience (AREs tend towards the "we don't change our story at the suggestions of strangers" and seem to follow a more linear path - which suits the marketing model fairly well) and players may or may not engage with eachother (there are many in the audience who don't find other players, or choose to go it alone for whatever reason).

So, again, to me this lady has not done much research in the genre before pushing herself in the forefront as an expert. And her answer to the question didn't make any sense to me. I think she was pulling something out of her butt - a laudible attempt (because I do think that ARGs have a lot in common with live theatre) but it makes me go "huh?" reading it three or four times.

[krystyn]

Where did she call herself an expert?

Her lecture was specifically tooled to talk about the game for which she just won an Emmy.

[aliendial]

All this aside - I think this was a game we would have loved. If it was in english. It really sounded like tons of fun and highly interactive.

[krystyn]

I like fun.