Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 11, 2024 10:39 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Administration » General
#unfiction
View previous topicView next topic
Page 4 of 7 [103 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
Author Message
krystyn
I Never Tire of My Own Voice


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 3651
Location: Is not Chicago

Wow, really? I have actually been trying to compose a post on this topic for days and days now. Gah.

You know what, Euchre? I apologize. Disrespect was about the furthest thing from my mind, and, truth be told, was a way for me to become more comfortable with the thread so that I could, in fact, post something substantive to it. I don't like being called rude and obnoxious, but I will be OK with that if I can also say that you calling me that says a lot about what you're willing to glean from the intention of my posts. And we could argue semantics all day, sure, but at the end of it, I like to show people that I like them. It's what I do.

Also, I was being somewhat literal with my metaphors (ha!): I was calling out your aphorisms of community death. It's like you were being all gothy and stuff to point out that perhaps my frivolity was not welcome in this Very Serious Thread.

So, OK.

Discussion about sexual issues in a free-form conduit like IRC is very fracking tricky, especially when there is an attached forum community of thousands and thousands of users who come from pretty much every conceivable internet-ready place on Earth to play *games*. There are *also* a *staggering* number of levels of anonymity about each person who contributes. It is often quite difficult to know exactly who you are talking to, at any given moment. This is not usually a cause for alarm or concern, but when it comes to personal things like sexual identity, the levels of anonymity become more important.

I have my own reasons for feeling uncomfortable with the conversations in #unfiction that have, as of late, veered towards the super-explicit. This does not make me a prude (srsly), and yet I am not particularly concerned about the children (except, you know, I do care, but it's not why I'm running for President), but! -- it was *also* hard to see the fall-out from steps the mods/ops took to address the concerns of the people who were feeling increasingly unwelcome in the channel.

It's not fun to be told that you were making someone else uncomfortable! It is not easy to find that tipping point where you feel you can engage in unfettered speech while others still feel welcome! There is no button anyone can push to make this happen, it's not a program anyone can write, and it's not something that the mods/ops can will into existence simply because they're the mods/ops. Being called on the carpet is, unfortunately, almost never a win-win situation. It's awkward and painful for pretty much everyone involved.

It takes work to go from there, and it can be done well as a community, rather than through a perceived/real power struggle.

For a lot of people, opting out of discussions about explicit topics is sub-optimal. It's not easy to post about it, because to defend oneself is to open oneself up to criticism about their very own personal issues, which feels twisty and hilariously inappropriate, right? In a way, it's asking someone who has a fear of heights to prove it by standing on their rooftop and saying, "I am very scared of falling right now!"

#unfiction is a leg of the giant Transformer robot that is this awesome and crazy and infuriating community. I love this place, and I respect and feel a sincere affection for a great many of the people who visit and contribute here.

But I also don't feel like this thread has reached a place where it's safe for people who have felt uncomfortable in IRC to talk about how to proceed from here. Or maybe I'm just speaking for me. It was the refutation of my cookie-ness that spurred me on, I guess.

Anyway. Explicit discussions are challenging for most online communities, and perhaps double so for communities that are ARG-focused. There are so many times I find myself bragging about the amazing sense of collective solving that goes on here, and one of the reasons it's so awesome is because the community eventually learns, as an entity, to welcome so many points of view and backgrounds that the lexicon of Things The Community Knows has astounding potential.

It feels weird that problem-solving is falling apart a little bit here, but the fact of the matter is, sex is often quite personal. The collective does not necessarily benefit from trying to extrapolate something that can be quite private, and translate that into a greater format, even if that format is a somewhat-busy IRC channel on some server somewhere.

I support people starting their own channels. It happens all the time, it is going on right now, and will continue to happen in the future.

I wish I had more solution to offer, but I just wanted to acknowledge that this is a tough topic, and some of the friction is a result of that. The mods/ops don't have all of the answers - they're just people, you know. Human. That's why this stuff gets brought to threads that are open for discussion.

I don't know. I've used too many words. I've deleted a half dozen posts already.
_________________
Alternate Currency
Stories and dreams, crossing my palm like silver.

xbl gamertag: krystyn


PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:38 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

krystyn wrote:
WYou know what, Euchre? I apologize. Disrespect was about the furthest thing from my mind, and, truth be told, was a way for me to become more comfortable with the thread so that I could, in fact, post something substantive to it. I don't like being called rude and obnoxious, but I will be OK with that if I can also say that you calling me that says a lot about what you're willing to glean from the intention of my posts. And we could argue semantics all day, sure, but at the end of it, I like to show people that I like them. It's what I do.

I didn't make a direct response that I felt such was disrespectful, because I was willing to shrug it off, as impersonal and just the way you deal with things. However, you seem to be willing to accept the consequence of saying something that might be offensive, even if you didn't understand that it could be. Now you know, and an apologetic response shows respect. Having brought it up, I'm willing to accept how it might make you feel poorly about me. You see how that works? That's a mutual respect, and responsibility.
Quote:
It's not fun to be told that you were making someone else uncomfortable! It is not easy to find that tipping point where you feel you can engage in unfettered speech while others still feel welcome! There is no button anyone can push to make this happen, it's not a program anyone can write, and it's not something that the mods/ops can will into existence simply because they're the mods/ops. Being called on the carpet is, unfortunately, almost never a win-win situation. It's awkward and painful for pretty much everyone involved.

...

For a lot of people, opting out of discussions about explicit topics is sub-optimal. It's not easy to post about it, because to defend oneself is to open oneself up to criticism about their very own personal issues, which feels twisty and hilariously inappropriate, right? In a way, it's asking someone who has a fear of heights to prove it by standing on their rooftop and saying, "I am very scared of falling right now!"

Indeed, this is all about the discomforts created by both being accused of offending and being offended. A constructive approach is needed to alleviate these situations. Things as they are now are not conducive to that end.
Quote:
It feels weird that problem-solving is falling apart a little bit here, but the fact of the matter is, sex is often quite personal. The collective does not necessarily benefit from trying to extrapolate something that can be quite private, and translate that into a greater format, even if that format is a somewhat-busy IRC channel on some server somewhere.

The reason the problem solving is falling apart is that instead of elevating to the idea of a solution, the matter of specifics is being pursued by both parties.

I am willing to accept the consequence of what I say, which includes upsetting and offending someone - even if it's not my intent. I show respect by accepting when someone takes offense at what I say and if they think less of me for it, and being willing to explain myself to them. If that method of peer interaction were followed in #unfiction I don't think this whole issue would have arisen.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:22 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
natas
PHP Ninja


Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 3177
Location: Northwest Indiana

I like the "Your mama" jokes better. That's easier for me to understand that you guy's long posts.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:28 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Gupfee
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Sep 2002
Posts: 817
Location: Massachusetts

Well K, you're a bigger woman than me because I am not going to apologize. What people are failing to realize here is that cookies are part of the forum culture, having been established as a (until now) non-threatening way to say, let's take a breather, we're all friends here. It's the online equivalent of the proverbial breaking of bread.

If that makes me a jerk, then so be it.
_________________
It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities without your help. - Judith Martin

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:18 am
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
jamesi
Sentient Being


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 2195
Location: Canadia

Here's what I still don't get about the subject of specifics -- isn't it pretty much common sense that you don't say something in chat that you wouldn't say to a minor (or anyone, for that matter) in real life? How specific does one have to be to say, "You can't say ______ in here because it's considered highly inappropriate to say _______ in real life conversations?"

Once again, we dance in circles while avoiding the advice of people who have a vested interest in including everyone in our chat conversations. And don't start with the accusatory "But you're excluding me because you're not letting me say what I want to say!" because, quite honestly, those of you choosing to make that argument fail to realize (or, realize but choose to argue anyway) that there is a big difference between censorship and appropriate conversation. Sorry, but the needs of the community (a safe, non-threatening area for all to chat in) outweigh any individual's need for saying whatever the heck they want to.

In short (because I love to summarize my own thoughts OVER AND OVER AGAIN): Just because you think you can exist in #uf whilst saying anything and everything that pops into your head doesn't mean you should be typing out statements that are (a) explicitly sexual, (b) threatening, (c) disgusting, (d) vulgar, and/or (e) full of language that could offend. As always, your choices are based on your views, but for God's sake, think of others before yourselves.
_________________
Digital Trail | Twitter | Retired ARGFest-o-Con 2012 Project Manager

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:58 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Vecheeso
Unfettered


Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Posts: 337
Location: Titusville, FL

jamesi wrote:
Sorry, but the needs of the community (a safe, non-threatening area for all to chat in) outweigh any individual's need for saying whatever the heck they want to.

In short (because I love to summarize my own thoughts OVER AND OVER AGAIN): Just because you think you can exist in #uf whilst saying anything and everything that pops into your head doesn't mean you should be typing out statements that are (a) explicitly sexual, (b) threatening, (c) disgusting, (d) vulgar, and/or (e) full of language that could offend. As always, your choices are based on your views, but for God's sake, think of others before yourselves.


i dont understand why there is still a discussion here. early on, it was asked to tone down the sexual talk, or make your own channel. people started toning it down and a separate channel was created. the needs of the community was answered when we were asked to please stop, or start a specific channel for such talks. we did exactly what was asked. those who felt they were unwelcome left #unfiction permanently, and those who wish to enjoy #unfiction as well as continue the raunchy talks they've come to enjoy, can now have such talks in the separate channel created specifically for it.

why is this not as simple as "you cant talk like that anymore, please tone it down, and if you wish, join #iasc for such discussions" and thats case closed??? resolution attained, the ruffians infecting the chat are gone/quiet. There is a special chat for talking raunchy. Why was that post about there being a new chat, not the last post? In the beginning it was "tone it down please" then it was "well, if you dont want/cant tone it down, make your own channel." so, a new channel was made. It's been toned down. Crisis averted. No more harmed sensibilities or children.

Isn't that the ENTIRE basis for this topic? "Tone it down, or leave", and some left. I mean, granted the 'tone it down' thing came out of nowhere, and is totally not applicable if you say anyone can talk about anything and that there is no rules. If you have to tone it down, then that means there is a standard, and when that standard is broken, then people say that things need to be changed back to meet that standard, and therefore the standard is the rule. So, it can no longer be said that in #unfiction there are no rules.

There are no solid/concrete rules, however, if an Op feels their own sensibilities or feelings/innocense of themselves or others in the chat are being violated/tread on, they will reprimand you for it. There are no rules in #unfiction, but there are the feelings/personality/sensibilities of the Ops that you are at the whim and mercy of, and that means that you may get away with something one day and not the other because of different Ops. If this is a problem with you, if you wish to say something that may not be accepted/acceptable because of the children or Ops, or other players in the chat, join #iasc and say it there if you like, or if its more convenient, just dont say it at all.

About the only other thing I can think of that could continue to be discussed here about #unfiction is the need for the Ops to start exercising discretion, instead of making their complaints in the middle of the chat, they need to address the individual, in privacy, if they are saying/doing something inappropriate in chat.

The only thing I will say in closing is that the "there are no rules" mantra needs to be removed from the #unfiction Ops/moderators lexicon, because it's disingenuous and misleading, and upsets lots of people when it is proven to be false, as we've seen. What should be said, and I even believe should be posted somewhere for anyone and everyone who goes into #unfiction is the following: "There are no rules in #unfiction, however, each Op has a different set of personal rules and values, and because of this, what is and isn't acceptable in chat will fluctuate depending on which Op is currently in chat or watching at any given time. If your conduct is seen as unacceptable, you will be reminded discreetly that there are others in #unfiction that may be offended by what you have said, and you will be directed to the separate chatroom made specifically for such possibly offensive conversations and topics. Have fun and play nice."
_________________
Brute Force Social Engineer (ty j5)
Currently Playing: The Aporia Agathon Project, Deleted, Eklipse Global


PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:30 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address
 Back to top 
natas
PHP Ninja


Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 3177
Location: Northwest Indiana

TLDR ARG Brownie Brownie Brownie Brownie Brownie Brownie

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:13 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

Still not sure why people can't simply accept - happily and respectfully - the point that #unfiction, being a public location and an official spinoff of Unfiction, is a place for respectable chat and discussion (not a difficult concept, as explained previously, it's a concept generally employed in numerous other areas of a person's public life).
There's no need for people of either opinion to vilify the other side.

If someone isn't respectable, they can be informed and asked to tone it down (publically or privately) - if they aren't, further action can be taken; if they are, then great! If someone wants to be unrespectable, then as per any other environment that employs a common sense expectation of respectability, they can go elsewhere; there's no need to vilify that environment by 'sticking it to them' and announcing that they're abandoning there entirely just because of these 'rules'; the two can easily coexist. But if anyone wants to leave and never return, well then that's their choice ultimately anyway.

The reason it's still going is because in this accepting this resolution, some people are making out their choice to appear as if its the 'higher ground' here. There's no need for that.

Go where you're comfortable. That's really all there is to it.

#unfiction is a common area, where as jamesi said, is intended for a wide range of personalities and people - so think about the greater community before yourself, treat it as a location where general respectability is encouraged. There's no 'rules' in that if you swear for example, you will be kicked or banned. If you're unrespectable, someone will likely say something, but if you battle it out for your right to be like that, then sure, you may be kicked. But that's what happens with spammers and trolls too (only much quicker and harsher).

Discussion content is lax compared to spamming and trolling. Respectability is encouraged, and if excessive dispute (on any topic or reason, really) is engaged, then yeah the ops have a right to decide for themselves what to do in any given case.

As for the relative opinion of various ops - it's just like in these forums. Ops will back each other, and if there's an issue on a meta level that needs to be resolved, take it up amongst themselves. If there's a general consensus, the ops will work together to support that consensus. I highly doubt there will be an op who says "ok when no other op is here but me, go nuts!". Ultimately that pits op against op, it can also promote favouritism, and form schisms. The ops, ultimately, are a team and will (or should) encourage the same environment no matter who's currently 'in charge', based on what's considered by the general community (ops and/or participants as a whole).

Anyway, now I've rambled too... really, it's simple. #unfiction is a public, common place for general common see respectability, like one would employ at work, with family, at a restaurant, on the radio, on the news, whatever... and if that's still a foreign concept, then yeah it may seem like rules bearing down on you. Well, not much can be done about it in that case. Just do your best to follow others' examples who do understand that level of respectability.

Ok, done now...
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:45 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

thebruce wrote:
If someone isn't respectable, they can be informed and asked to tone it down (publically or privately) - if they aren't, further action can be taken; if they are, then great!

This does not seem to be the way things were being done, hence why the initial post in the thread led to such grand confusion.
Quote:
But if anyone wants to leave and never return, well then that's their choice ultimately anyway.

If those that manage a channel say 'like it or leave it', that is not their choice to leave - it is the choice. The implication is that if you don't like it, you are expected to leave or you will be helped in doing so. Not really much of a choice, just a matter of opting on your sentence.
Quote:
As for the relative opinion of various ops - it's just like in these forums. Ops will back each other, and if there's an issue on a meta level that needs to be resolved, take it up amongst themselves.

When was the last time someone actually 'broke ranks' and spoke out about how they felt any moderation - or all of it - is being done? How was it received? It's my impression (having but a small peek into this realm) that nobody dares break ranks, lest you be the next to start feeling excluded.

I think there is such a fear of a loss of power that most in administration would not dare speak out in opposition to such a declaration as started this thread. The 'open minded' approach that 'allows a community to evolve naturally' instantly dies when leadership becomes unquestionable from within or without. If the administration exists for the community and is to accept it openly, then why this resistance to a substantial dialog about the standards used here? Has the community evolved into something the administration didn't want or expect? Isn't this matter one of trying to control the community and restrain it's evolution into something a few no longer identify with?

When you have such a wide open approach, expect change. Expect challenges. Don't expect to know where your community is going, just be ready to accept what it becomes.
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:12 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
natas
PHP Ninja


Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 3177
Location: Northwest Indiana

Euchre wrote:
Don't expect to know where your community is going, just be ready to accept what it becomes.


What if it becomes full of blithering idiots spewing nonsense and promoting porn, (kinda like me)?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:42 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
 Back to top 
Euchre
uF Game Warden


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 3342

natas wrote:
Euchre wrote:
Don't expect to know where your community is going, just be ready to accept what it becomes.


What if it becomes full of blithering idiots spewing nonsense and promoting porn, (kinda like me)?

Isn't the lack of rules wonderful?
Twisted Evil
_________________
Any sufficiently plausible fiction is indistinguishable from reality.
Any sufficiently twisted reality is indistinguishable from fiction.
Welcome to the new world of entertainment.
ŠEuchre 2007


PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:23 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
addlepated
Unfictologist


Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Posts: 1885
Location: Austin, Texas

Euchre wrote:
I think there is such a fear of a loss of power that most in administration would not dare speak out in opposition to such a declaration as started this thread.

I think you might be getting correlation and causation mixed up in this case. I imagine the admins are chosen because they're a group of like-minded people and would tend to think the same way about issues, anyway.
_________________
Give a man a match, and he is warm for a night. Light a man on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:19 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
jamesi
Sentient Being


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 2195
Location: Canadia

Fine, let's do it your way...

Euchre wrote:
This does not seem to be the way things were being done, hence why the initial post in the thread led to such grand confusion.


What is so darn confusing about, "Therefore, overt discussion of sexual topics, along with similar behavior, isn't really a good idea" ? Seems pretty straight forward to me. Would you like me to provide concrete examples of overt discussion of sexual topics for you? Is that what you need?

Euchre wrote:
If those that manage a channel say 'like it or leave it', that is not their choice to leave - it is the choice. The implication is that if you don't like it, you are expected to leave or you will be helped in doing so. Not really much of a choice, just a matter of opting on your sentence.


Cue the melodrama. It is not the choice but a choice. You have the same choice here at the forums -- don't like it here? No one is forcing you to stay. Drawing conclusions based on false implications is misguided at best, and trollish at worst. I'll mark you down for misguided.

Euchre wrote:
When was the last time someone actually 'broke ranks' and spoke out about how they felt any moderation - or all of it - is being done? How was it received? It's my impression (having but a small peek into this realm) that nobody dares break ranks, lest you be the next to start feeling excluded... I think there is such a fear of a loss of power that most in administration would not dare speak out in opposition to such a declaration as started this thread.


Then your peek is, indeed, small. Is it true that nobody dares break ranks or is it just that moderators here tend to agree (or, at least, respect) the opinions of the other moderators? I think for the former to be true, then people must fear those that 'outrank them' here on the Unfiction forums and in the #unfiction chat room. Hands up, all of those in that position that quake in their boots with the very thought of displeasing your Forum/Chat Room overlords, and leave them up while I count.

Euchre wrote:
The 'open minded' approach that 'allows a community to evolve naturally' instantly dies when leadership becomes unquestionable from within or without.


If you can show me an instance where the leadership here has become unquestionable, I will give you a cookie. Except, you don't like accepting cookies, so instead, a horse head.

Euchre wrote:
If the administration exists for the community and is to accept it openly, then why this resistance to a substantial dialog about the standards used here? Has the community evolved into something the administration didn't want or expect? Isn't this matter one of trying to control the community and restrain it's evolution into something a few no longer identify with?


Of course, why didn't I see this before?! Every time someone contributes to a chat that is full of sex talk and vulgar language, we're evolving!!! When our standards for decent, civil conversation come into question because some people want to talk about genitalia and masturbation and the what not, that means the control over the community is lost forever! Anarchy and snack cakes for everyone, 'tis time for a celebration!

Euchre wrote:
When you have such a wide open approach, expect change. Expect challenges. Don't expect to know where your community is going, just be ready to accept what it becomes.


And don't assume that just because community members don't have the time or patience to speak up against those who move the conversation to the other side of the decency line, that they're not part of the community anymore. I offer your advice right back to you: don't expect to know where the community is going -- you seem to have only part of the full picture.

Euchre wrote:
Isn't the lack of rules wonderful?


Almost as wonderful as the lack of common sense.

There, I played the quote game too. I feel that we're definitely moving forward in this conversation! Rolling Eyes
_________________
Digital Trail | Twitter | Retired ARGFest-o-Con 2012 Project Manager

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:21 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
jamesi
Sentient Being


Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 2195
Location: Canadia

Vecheeso wrote:
A lot of stuff...


(1) There was no mention "early on" to make your own channel. That was an opinion offered by one person to another, and that happened yesterday. Yes, we were all asked to tone down the sexual talk 15 days ago, but that was a courteous request and not a declaration of policy change, That point has been made in this thread before.

(2) Yay for your new chat room. Hope things go well, and that your "raunchy talks" help those of you in the room to feel more welcome in this game-playing community.

(3) I would love to be a part of your Utopian world where anyone can talk about anything. No, wait -- if that were to happen, then unfiltered discussion about the rape, torture and murder of an innocent child victim would be well within the boundaries of the Utopian chat environment that requires no rules, and that's only one of seven thousand and thirty-two conversations I do not want to be a part of, either as a contributor or a spectator. So, I guess I'll have to stay in #unficton, where there are no rules, except for the ones that suggest we don't talk about bad stuff that may alienate or disgust others.

(4) You know why an Op may reprimand someone for violating the feelings of another? BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

(5) You claim to have wanted direction from the Ops in regards to what is 'good talk' and what is 'bad talk' and then you hate on them for saying something in chat about the inappropriateness of a statement. There's something oddly contradictory there, don't you think? Meh, what do you care, you've left #unfiction anyway.

(6) For the 'lots of people' who were upset when they were clued in to the fact that there are socially acceptable and responsible ways (you said "rules") to talk to each other in #unfiction, I have a bit of advice for you: instead of dwelling on the hurt, the pain, and the suffering this has inflicted upon your fragile souls, consider it a refreshing reminder as to the quality of conversation 'lots of people' have grown accustomed to in #unfiction. Amidst all of the "raunchy talk" there are awesome conversations that revolve around politics, world issues, the economy, the climate, the newest XKCD comic, and even ARGs. Cast away your negative shadows and learn to love #unfiction again!

(As an aside, I think "Have fun and play nice" is a great set of rules for #unfiction. Well said!)
_________________
Digital Trail | Twitter | Retired ARGFest-o-Con 2012 Project Manager

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:52 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
redct
Entrenched


Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1233

jamesi wrote:

Euchre wrote:
When was the last time someone actually 'broke ranks' and spoke out about how they felt any moderation - or all of it - is being done? How was it received? It's my impression (having but a small peek into this realm) that nobody dares break ranks, lest you be the next to start feeling excluded... I think there is such a fear of a loss of power that most in administration would not dare speak out in opposition to such a declaration as started this thread.


Then your peek is, indeed, small. Is it true that nobody dares break ranks or is it just that moderators here tend to agree (or, at least, respect) the opinions of the other moderators? I think for the former to be true, then people must fear those that 'outrank them' here on the Unfiction forums and in the #unfiction chat room. Hands up, all of those in that position that quake in their boots with the very thought of displeasing your Forum/Chat Room overlords, and leave them up while I count.



If you're afraid to break ranks then wouldn't you be afraid to show yourself? -_-

This is NOT getting anywhere.
_________________
Playing and lurking: I'm too lazy to keep track
someone in IRC: see, sometimes instead of a man and woman loving each other, men and men love each other. this usually happens in prison, but sometimes in real life


PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:12 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 4 of 7 [103 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Administration » General
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group