unforum

[sowasred2012]

[celina63]

[bgates87]

[FacianeA]

I have a theory. How bout it's 42E doing a very clever and hilarious promo for the Dark Knight home video release. They get us all excited about it being wonder woman, the face is finally revealed, and it's all smiley! Think about it! Joker thing on the wall! Bingo! I bet I'm a genius. Haha.

[rose]

I think that the image of the Joker used in the marketing posters for the Dark Knight is the property of Warner Bros. Warner Bros is also behind the Wonder Woman straight to video movie....at least that is what wikipedia says. So it would make sense if they want to capitalize on the large on-line fan base who played the Dark Knight ARG. I really hope they are, it will be the first time a studio took advantage of the huge on-line audience developed by an ARG to market another property.

And Wonder Woman is the property of DC Comics - I really don't see them allowing anyone to use their image in a political campaign.

Don't Wonder Woman and Batman belong to the same Justice League thing?

Oh I get it. "Very soon the truth will be revealed." Doesn't Wonder Woman have that lasso that makes people tell the truth?

[shylilembrace]

Yes, wonder Dominatrix has a lasso of truth that she gets tied up with nine times out of ten <.<

[sowasred2012]

[rose]

My impression is that 42 has indicated as clearly as they possibly can, that they aren't involved in this wonderwoman viral. You can scroll back through this thread for verification. Unless they've changed policy, they don't twitter about their own games. And, if they were posting in a thread about their own game, they would break the one unbreakable rule of these forums. They simply wouldn't do that to their fans and players.

A true compliment to 42 that whenever a viral campaign comes up people wonder [hope] their company might be involved.

[sowasred2012]

[rose]

[sowasred2012]

[INCyr]

Anyone else notice, in the same style as the joker face, the "who are you?" in the upper right hand corner. Anyone know when that was added?

Also, anyone find it strange it's NOT been updated yet today? It seems like all the other updates were weekday-ly (as in, not on the weekend.)

As far as it being DC property, this could just be flying under their radar if it's someone stumping for Palin. However, it is interesting to note that it's Silver Pictures instead of Legendary, giving it a bit more credibility over someone just taking the TDK production companies and trying to make it look real.

[Nighthawk]

Update!

Hubba hubba!

[INCyr]

Well, at least it's not a Palin ad.

I'm not sure what to think about this though. We have no other reports of anything happening with a Wonder Woman movie, and usually you hear at least something come out of hollywoods rumor mill before an announcement. Plus, there's nothing on her IMDb page indicating a WW movie in the future, although it could just not be updated yet.

And did anyone else see the writing on the wall before the image shows up? I believe it says "Is this for real?" in the now-familiar Joker scrawl.

Edit 1:
Here's a link to the background image without the poster overlay:
http://www.wonder-who.com/wonderwhowebpage5.jpg

Edit 2:
Going back through wonderwhowebpage#.jpg, it appears the "Is this real" shows up first on page 4. However, my monitor at work is not configured to let me see when the Joker face shows up, or when the "Who are you?" in the upper right hand corner appears.

[degravedi]

Hmm, I have heard plenty of rumors about Megan Fox being Wonder Woman, but I still have to wonder if this is just a fan hoax. The picture is obviously photoshopped, but then again, studios have done that in the past to build hype when there aren't any stills available yet. So I'm split.