unforum

[Rogi Ocnorb]

I've got one ready, but will defer till later.

[la!uep]

[retsbob999]

OK, here's a Quickie

[Rogi Ocnorb]

A LOT!

[la!uep]

[Rogi Ocnorb]

Frankly, No. I can't.
When I got to that point, I took the easy road and just started looking for multiples of 2520, manually, believing that it couldn't be more than eleven attempts.

Okay, Here's a new one:
************************************

[sixsidedsquare]

[la!uep]

Six, hope you're enjoying your vacation. Happy Easter!

Rogi, If Holmes drew a picture or wrote out something through his contacts, all I'm seeing is a field of random dots, just like Moriarty said. I can't identify any clear shape or letter.

Any further hints? Maybe I'm even blinder than Moriarty.

ETA: N is to the right, so maybe tilt your head, sorry. So there's like another 10-mile wide hole to the west...

[Rogi Ocnorb]

Remember Holmes' penchant for rounding down.

[la!uep]

I've got nothing. I've been rounding down everything in sight to no avail. What would be the relevance of the azimuth data, or even the precise timestamps we have (other than to order the whole message)?

[Rogi Ocnorb]

Did you notice any pattern when you rounded down the azimuth data?
As for the dates and times. When I changed the year, I said it would have no bearing on the puzzle. I can say the same thing for the times.
What utility did you use to do your graph? Does it let you add grid lines?

[la!uep]

When Holmes says "round down," I interpret that as truncate ("leave you with a little something" wouldn't be guaranteed with normal rounding). The range value space goes to 30 possible values (10 to 39 miles), which got me thinking letters plus some punctuation. But looking at the frequencies makes me think that's not it.

When truncating azimuth to whole degrees the change (visually) is minimal. Maybe rounding down to like 5 or 10 or 15 degree multiples? I tried those and couldn't see anything either.

I'm using Microsoft Excel. Sure, I can put grid lines, but if I need them along the azimuth-range dimensions I need to "unwrap" the chart from a doughnut shape into a rectangle strip. So I'm doing it both ways. I'm adding lines every 5 or 10 miles (in both charts), and every 15 degrees of azimuth (in the unwrapped strip). Still no pattern.

I must be doing something wrong, but there's so much manipulation going on already that I'm not too fond of testing all variations exhaustively.

Someone else please take it from here, this is too much like my day job (time-based data trend analysis).

[Rogi Ocnorb]

Okay.
I'll just specify the best of what you've already tried
Truncate azimuth to full degrees.
Truncate range to 10 miles (Just like the ticks in your first graph).
Order by azimuth
Unwrap the chart.

ETA: Or, don't truncate anything and create zones of 1 degree by 10 miles using lines and the method should become apparent.

[la!uep]

Ahh, now that was much more fun. But how was Moriarty supposed to know about the 10-mile zones? And even knowing that tip, without actually truncating the data and seeing it unwrapped it would be impossible to make out the pattern, blind or not.

[Rogi Ocnorb]

Yeah. Devon Island is the largest uninhabited island on Earth.

So, I probably threw that one together a little too hurriedly.
I was going to do it without any decimal digits, but it seemed too easy.
And having a 5 mile max range just didn't seem right. Retrospectively, I guess I should have stuck with one mile increments, though.

When you posted that first chart, I thought, "He's done it again. Just add the lines and see where things fall.". Dots would have appeared in "random" areas within squares, but there would have been only one dot per square. I was glad to see that you had discounted the date/time data as irrelevant.

Sorry for the few that ended up in the wrong quadrant. I was sure I'd set all the Random() fields (dates, times, "ones digit" miles and fractional miles/degrees) to not affect the base values.

I always wanted to do one of these with an actual picture, but got in a rush and decided on just going Braille.

Don't know about everybody else, but I'm feeling a little silly.

ETA: Got to looking at my reply and realized that I mentioned it, but never really answered daniel's question about WHY I ended up going with the 10-mile schema (an unfortunate side-effect of MY day job).

Basically, I was thinking the "blind man" clue would get better mileage and that, once the Braille path was chosen, the necessary adjustments would be made to make the data fit.