Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 18, 2024 9:36 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Meta » Puppetmaster Help
Question on PM etiquette?
Moderators: imbri
View previous topicView next topic
Page 1 of 1 [13 Posts]  
Author Message
unmortal_mind
Boot

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 58
Location: Washington DC

Question on PM etiquette?
(At what point, do you come out from behind the curtain?)

One of the ARGs I helped with is best described as either:

  1. Defunct
  2. On indefinite hiatus
  3. On hiatus, but the head PM isn't telling anyone when the next book will drop


At what point, can you finally come out from behind the curtain and note "I helped with ARG X"?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:26 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Agent Lex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1188
Location: No longer London, still in England

I think this is a question you should be asking the head PM of your team, not the forum at large.

That said, if I personally had to define a boundary, it would probably be if you're absolutely sure the game will never start again. And you're sure you want your name to be involved with it Razz

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:19 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
ndemeter
Entrenched


Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 1037
Location: Sunny California!

Usually there is something like a PM chat or something like that where people can be outed at. Are you guys not planning something like that? If not AND the game is not active then I would think it's OK to reference your PM experience when warranted.

Just my personal opinion.
_________________
Twitter: NickoDM - XBL: NickoDM

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:26 pm
 View user's profile AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Ziola
Decorated


Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 152
Location: A couch somewhere...

Personally, I'm a big fan of NEVER coming out from behind the curtain. I work for a series of intertwined ARG's but all my OOG instructions are couched IG through character PM's. Its really rather amusing. People think I'm far more involved in the storylines then I really am. I'm just a player with a big mouth Laughing

I guess my experience with PM's coming out has been less then favorable. Nothing like two glory hogs who haven't produced ANYTHING in over a year to leave a nasty taste in one's mouth. It wouldn't be so bad if they weren't still rehashing their "glory days" when they ruled the ARG world (in their opinions, not mine).

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:11 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
thebruce
Dances With Wikis


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 6899
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

I guess it depends on what their role was in the ended campaign... I mean if someone did everything they were supposed to do and did it well, but it all ended for some other reason (avoidable or not), then 'coming out' could be beneficial for them if they want to continue doing that in other games, with other teams...
I mean, it might not be smart if the crashed game crashed because of you, to come out and say you were behind it Razz But I don't think never coming out, especially if you did a good job for your part...
_________________
@4DFiction/@Wikibruce/Contact
ARGFest 2013 - Seattle! ARGFest.com


PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:23 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website AIM Address
 Back to top 
krystyn
I Never Tire of My Own Voice


Joined: 26 Sep 2002
Posts: 3651
Location: Is not Chicago

Ziola wrote:
I guess my experience with PM's coming out has been less then favorable. Nothing like two glory hogs who haven't produced ANYTHING in over a year to leave a nasty taste in one's mouth. It wouldn't be so bad if they weren't still rehashing their "glory days" when they ruled the ARG world (in their opinions, not mine).

I like string!
_________________
Alternate Currency
Stories and dreams, crossing my palm like silver.

xbl gamertag: krystyn


PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:25 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
danteIL
Unfictologist


Joined: 08 May 2006
Posts: 1990

Yea see, if there were no curtain in the first place, then this wouldn't even be an issue.


But that's just my opinion...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:46 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Agent Lex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 1188
Location: No longer London, still in England

Ziola wrote:
Personally, I'm a big fan of NEVER coming out from behind the curtain.


I'm the opposite, especially if you want to consider the future of the format.

If we never found out who was the PM of a game, either before or after, then we would never find out whose games we like. Or even whose games are good at all, or absolutely rubbish. So every time, as well as the forced mystery of a trailhead, you get the forced mystery of whether the game will be good or not.

If PMs came out after, or even before/during a game, then it would be far easier to pick out a game to play based on a PM you like. Do we really need the identity of a PM shrouded in mystery? What is the huge benefit to not knowing who's running a game?

danteIL wrote:
Yea see, if there were no curtain in the first place, then this wouldn't even be an issue.


But that's just my opinion...

While my opinion isn't quite so extreme as to eliminate the curtain completely, this is along the right lines.

So long as character interaction and PM interaction are kept separate, with different rules etc, then there shouldn't be a problem. But that's a discussion for another thread...

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:35 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
FLmutant
Decorated


Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 244
Location: Orlando, FL

I have pretty non-standard opinions on that too. Slight telegraphs of the PM team, even at the beginning, are frequently useful for establishing intent. For example, I don't use "domains by proxy" to hide domain registration primarily because that info is predominatly OOG and useful to people who aren't playing and trying to figure out the intent. It also, though, tips the hand of authorship (which can be good in establishing "yes, this might indeed by an ARG") but also create challenges (yes, I know SOME of you keep track of every domain we register, dang you!)

Otherwise, while a experience is happening, I tend to think it is a bit of a cop-out if you have to resort to OOG communication with the players, but I have less of a firm opinion on that when speaking to the press (although NO REVEALS TO PRESS is a good guideline.) When the experience isn't happening, I tend to think a level of interaction with participants is valuable, natural and desired (whether that's OOG blog, PM chats, panels at ARGFest or what have you.)

I echo the comments earlier though: by all means, this is a question for you to pose with your PM team. No two teams approach this exactly the same way.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:51 am
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
rose
...and then Magic happens


Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Posts: 4117

I think there is value in the PMs revealing themselves when a game is over. First, PM chats with the players are always informative as well as a chance for players to acknowledge their relationship with the PMs and to thank them.
Second, sometimes players don't want to accept that a game is over, even when to others the game has clearly ended. An end announcement makes it clear the game is over.
Finally, and most important from the PMs view, I think, is that an end of game credit announcement insures that the PMs will always get credit for their work. Sadly, occasionally, as time goes on, people will take credit for work they didn't actually do, try to diminish the input and work of other team members, or try to claim that someone didn't do work they actually did. This is part of the reason why TV shows and films post extensive lists of credits,it prevents people from rewriting history. I think ARGs should do the same, to help protect the creative people involved behind the curtain from unwarranted backstabbing later on.
_________________
I love this site for being free, in every sense of the word~Spacebass

Mankind was my business, the common good was my business.~ Dickens


PostPosted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 1:58 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
unmortal_mind
Boot

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 58
Location: Washington DC

ndemeter wrote:
Usually there is something like a PM chat or something like that where people can be outed at. Are you guys not planning something like that? If not AND the game is not active then I would think it's OK to reference your PM experience when warranted.

Just my personal opinion.


I'm not aware of anything such as a PM chat being planned.

(Topic never came up in our team forums nor has the head PM mentioned it otherwise).

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:46 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
unmortal_mind
Boot

Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 58
Location: Washington DC

Agent Lex wrote:
I think this is a question you should be asking the head PM of your team, not the forum at large.

That said, if I personally had to define a boundary, it would probably be if you're absolutely sure the game will never start again. And you're sure you want your name to be involved with it Razz


My reason for asking on the forum was:

My participation on the ARG was on the technical side of the equation rather than the narrative side. (Ie. Puzzle design, etc.)

So, I couldn't answer any questions about whether the narrative is continuing, or what is happening next.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Ziola
Decorated


Joined: 09 Jan 2009
Posts: 152
Location: A couch somewhere...

It seems like I'm totally in the minority on this one. So I guess I'll amend my earlier post with some quasi-intelligent thoughts. If one is going to come out from behind the curtain, please make sure you do it after the game is completely over. Its fine and dandy to do so once things have run their course but doing so while the game is ongoing really tends to ruin things, IMHO. For me, part of the fun is not knowing who is running things, so I can't try and garner insider info just to have the upper hand (which I have seen people do). And if some people know who the PM is while others don't, it leads to an almost elitism attitude.

PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:50 pm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 1 of 1 [13 Posts]  
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Meta » Puppetmaster Help
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group