Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:15 am
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Spooky Video- You will never catch me.
View previous topicView next topic
Page 51 of 65 [974 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, ..., 63, 64, 65  Next
Author Message
The Unspoken Soldier
Boot

Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 10

Just thinking theoretically, what if "not right only <<" means that this code is not right (meaning a second way to solve it) and only << meaning that it is the only code left we have not figured out completely? Any one else think of this? Let me know

PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:48 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
anonwinlol
Veteran

Joined: 06 Aug 2009
Posts: 95

The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
Just thinking theoretically, what if "not right only <<" means that this code is not right (meaning a second way to solve it) and only << meaning that it is the only code left we have not figured out completely? Any one else think of this? Let me know


Thats not possible seeing as it was one of the first codes.

Also it's possible the code we've done wrong.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:08 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JBlaze
Guest


I am sorry if what I am saying here has already been discussed. If it has not, I warn you that I am revealing the PM., I am not saying I figured the 'mystery' out but I do know for sure whats going on here.

Ok People, I have just become interested with ARG's and equally obsessed with this one specifically. I have not read all of the posts. I got to the point where 'Justanother' was being accused of either being in charge or something of the like. I then had a couple quick, instinctual ideas that lead me to a simple conclusion.

Again, I didnt read all of the posts, I got a bunch of pages in and then jumped around to get the feel of the current conversation.

I am getting the feeling from what I read, that no one has really mentioned this, if people have discussed what I am about to reveal and have decided to just continue with the mystery then I apologize in advance.

Here is what I just discovered.
Justanother may or may not be the PM, regardless, the person has given us the answer. I investigated the artist mentioned by Justanother and on imdb.com i found a solid hit. The artist has a lengthy film list and one of the most recent is "Murder Collection". Click on the link coming up to see a video for Murder Collection, tell me if you notice someone in the video....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axrBMmKOW2E
http://murdercollection.com/

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:48 am
 Back to top 
JBlaze
Guest


In addition, I just moved from Somerset, Ky which is very close to the supposed area in KY. I will say that it is possible that it is in Kentucky, my guess is that it is in PA, in the Allegheny area, I am pretty confident in that.

The artist is known for making the most gruesome and 'snufflike' horror films out there.

This, like so many other ARG's are bloodsucking advertisements.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:57 am
 Back to top 
mucka1916
Veteran

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 103

JBlaze wrote:
In addition, I just moved from Somerset, Ky which is very close to the supposed area in KY. I will say that it is possible that it is in Kentucky, my guess is that it is in PA, in the Allegheny area, I am pretty confident in that.

The artist is known for making the most gruesome and 'snufflike' horror films out there.

This, like so many other ARG's are bloodsucking advertisements.


Ok well since u haven't read what was said allow me to recap





kthnxbai

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:59 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
The Unspoken Soldier
Boot

Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 10

So what you're saying is that this guy is Balan?

And either way if this is the case, the point is to FIND the PM, not find out who they are, but this is good headway, we now have a name and a face assigned to the PM if you are right.

As for the math puzzle, the one on the left. I think the T's and X's were meant to separate the numbers. so the equation would look like this

2x3-1+8-1+5-1x4-7
which equals 6

Don't know if anyone has found that already, I apologize if it has. We need a wiki up soon.
Also. 2 friends over and we're stumped on the 2nd part of the equation.
Does anybody know anything new?

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:07 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
mucka1916
Veteran

Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 103

The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
So what you're saying is that this guy is Balan?

And either way if this is the case, the point is to FIND the PM, not find out who they are, but this is good headway, we now have a name and a face assigned to the PM if you are right.

As for the math puzzle, the one on the left. I think the T's and X's were meant to separate the numbers. so the equation would look like this

2x3-1+8-1+5-1x4-7
which equals 6

Don't know if anyone has found that already, I apologize if it has. We need a wiki up soon.
Also. 2 friends over and we're stumped on the 2nd part of the equation.
Does anybody know anything new?


Ok seriously this is pissing me off

WOULD PEOPLE QUIT FLOCKING TO EVERY TROLL THAT POSTS.

now that my rant is over the 2 equations may not be linked. there is nothing to say the are... I know you're only giving a suggestion but I just can't see the format Sad

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:09 am
 View user's profile MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
The Unspoken Soldier
Boot

Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 10

mucka1916 wrote:
The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
So what you're saying is that this guy is Balan?

And either way if this is the case, the point is to FIND the PM, not find out who they are, but this is good headway, we now have a name and a face assigned to the PM if you are right.

As for the math puzzle, the one on the left. I think the T's and X's were meant to separate the numbers. so the equation would look like this

2x3-1+8-1+5-1x4-7
which equals 6

Don't know if anyone has found that already, I apologize if it has. We need a wiki up soon.
Also. 2 friends over and we're stumped on the 2nd part of the equation.
Does anybody know anything new?


Ok seriously this is pissing me off

WOULD PEOPLE QUIT FLOCKING TO EVERY TROLL THAT POSTS.

now that my rant is over the 2 equations may not be linked. there is nothing to say the are... I know you're only giving a suggestion but I just can't see the format Sad


I never said that they were specifically linked. Because I honestly believe they are to be kept seperate and the answers together may give us something. Again, only a theory of mine, I would like to hear from the people on msn to see if they have made any progress, please add me
dman1354SPLAThotmail.com

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:15 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
freakgd
Greenhorn

Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 7

The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
mucka1916 wrote:
The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
So what you're saying is that this guy is Balan?

And either way if this is the case, the point is to FIND the PM, not find out who they are, but this is good headway, we now have a name and a face assigned to the PM if you are right.

As for the math puzzle, the one on the left. I think the T's and X's were meant to separate the numbers. so the equation would look like this

2x3-1+8-1+5-1x4-7
which equals 6

Don't know if anyone has found that already, I apologize if it has. We need a wiki up soon.
Also. 2 friends over and we're stumped on the 2nd part of the equation.
Does anybody know anything new?


Ok seriously this is pissing me off

WOULD PEOPLE QUIT FLOCKING TO EVERY TROLL THAT POSTS.

now that my rant is over the 2 equations may not be linked. there is nothing to say the are... I know you're only giving a suggestion but I just can't see the format Sad


I never said that they were specifically linked. Because I honestly believe they are to be kept seperate and the answers together may give us something. Again, only a theory of mine, I would like to hear from the people on msn to see if they have made any progress, please add me
dman1354SPLAThotmail.com



i posted the equation about 10 pages ago

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:37 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
anonwinlol
Veteran

Joined: 06 Aug 2009
Posts: 95

The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
mucka1916 wrote:
The Unspoken Soldier wrote:
So what you're saying is that this guy is Balan?

And either way if this is the case, the point is to FIND the PM, not find out who they are, but this is good headway, we now have a name and a face assigned to the PM if you are right.

As for the math puzzle, the one on the left. I think the T's and X's were meant to separate the numbers. so the equation would look like this

2x3-1+8-1+5-1x4-7
which equals 6

Don't know if anyone has found that already, I apologize if it has. We need a wiki up soon.
Also. 2 friends over and we're stumped on the 2nd part of the equation.
Does anybody know anything new?


Ok seriously this is pissing me off

WOULD PEOPLE QUIT FLOCKING TO EVERY TROLL THAT POSTS.

now that my rant is over the 2 equations may not be linked. there is nothing to say the are... I know you're only giving a suggestion but I just can't see the format Sad


I never said that they were specifically linked. Because I honestly believe they are to be kept seperate and the answers together may give us something. Again, only a theory of mine, I would like to hear from the people on msn to see if they have made any progress, please add me
dman1354SPLAThotmail.com


The "msn group" (you may call us the think tank, lol) is currenltly on a break.
So they're will be nothing new coming from our side for a couple of days.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:17 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
arte_nm
Boot

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Posts: 17

hello im new to this forum i decided to sign in after read through all the pages. very interesting case. i will help if i can.
I have some photoshop skill and i wanted to ask is anyone remember a post of a guy who recaped whole movie into single images. i wanted to do something with them take a better look
regards

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:03 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
arte_nm
Boot

Joined: 15 Aug 2009
Posts: 17

i found something i wrote not right only 683 in google first web page that comes up is:
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/6/6.F3d.683.92-5154.html

when you go to point 16
there is spot that says

The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The guarantees of the First Amendment run only against the federal government. Of course, by incorporation into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, these guarantees also run against the State, Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 235, 83 S.Ct. 680, 683, 9 L.Ed.2d 697 (1963), but this does not make the First Amendment a protection against Appellees' private conspiracy. Mr. Tilton's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims likewise fail as these Amendments do not erect a shield against merely private conduct however discriminating or wrongful. See Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. 1161 (1948).

the date that draged my attention as far as i remember one of the members of forum found date coded...
it might be a clue or just false alarm
maybe im just to exited and that 683 is in my head all the time...

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:24 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Chagrinned Goat
Kl00


Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 42

arte_nm wrote:
i found something i wrote not right only 683 in google first web page that comes up is:
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/6/6.F3d.683.92-5154.html

when you go to point 16
there is spot that says

The First Amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." The guarantees of the First Amendment run only against the federal government. Of course, by incorporation into the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, these guarantees also run against the State, Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 235, 83 S.Ct. 680, 683, 9 L.Ed.2d 697 (1963), but this does not make the First Amendment a protection against Appellees' private conspiracy. Mr. Tilton's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims likewise fail as these Amendments do not erect a shield against merely private conduct however discriminating or wrongful. See Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. 1161 (1948).

the date that draged my attention as far as i remember one of the members of forum found date coded...
it might be a clue or just false alarm
maybe im just to exited and that 683 is in my head all the time...


That's actually really close. I remembered that at least 1962 was mentioned.

1962 was found here as an answer to the 23 - 18 - 15 - 14 - 7 equation.

I don't know if that's close enough to actually link the two dates, though. =\

Also, speaking of "Edwards v. South Carolina", South Carolina isn't a state we've considered. However, North Carolina has come up in conversation, if that's good for anything.


So, basically, no real input from me, just linking some of the information you added.

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 7:04 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
StabbyLaLa
Greenhorn


Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 5

waitingtoplay's profile and video on YT have been removed. thoughts?

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:22 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
the good reverend
Guest


Still there for me

PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:28 am
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 51 of 65 [974 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, ..., 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, ..., 63, 64, 65  Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Archive » Archive: General » Old News & Rumors
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group