Return to Unfiction unforum
 a.r.g.b.b 
FAQ FAQ   Search Search 
 
Welcome!
New users, PLEASE read these forum guidelines. New posters, SEARCH before posting and read these rules before posting your killer new campaign. New players may also wish to peruse the ARG Player Tutorial.

All users must abide by the Terms of Service.
Website Restoration Project
This archiving project is a collaboration between Unfiction and Sean Stacey (SpaceBass), Brian Enigma (BrianEnigma), and Laura E. Hall (lehall) with
the Center for Immersive Arts.
Announcements
This is a static snapshot of the
Unfiction forums, as of
July 23, 2017.
This site is intended as an archive to chronicle the history of Alternate Reality Games.
 
The time now is Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:04 pm
All times are UTC - 4 (DST in action)
View posts in this forum since last visit
View unanswered posts in this forum
Calendar
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Prank theory
Moderators: Giskard, JKatkina, Zarggg
View previous topicView next topic
Page 3 of 4 [48 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
ASD
Greenhorn

Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 7

Is it possible that Alex no longer knows what's actually on the tapes? He knows there's something wrong or horrifying, but he can't remember, or does not want to, which is why he hands it over to J more easily than he should.

Also, I'm new here as well. Hello everyone.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:51 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TNC
Guest


Hmm. It's possible he may not remember any of the events DUE to Entry 14. Maybe he got a concussion, or Slender Man erased his memory somehow? Then, when he saw all the tapes, he went back to see just what the hell it was, got freaked out early on and wanted to get rid of them by any means necessary.

I also want to bring to light te parallelism between MH and JAF at this time; Both characters, Alex and Joshua, have the first initial thought to burn their evidence, and instead pass it on.

Congratulations, Dav, you're the new J.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:03 am
 Back to top 
Grooze
Veteran


Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 101

fezzik wrote:
No, I meant Alex. At the time J was convincing him to hand over the tapes, Alex no longer seemed concerned with finishing the movie. I'm not concerned with J's motivation for wanting the tapes - that seems natural - nor with J looking at them years later - that seems natural too. What seems odd is that Alex would give them to him. If I had tapes like the ones Alex has, including shots of me bleeding profusely out of my head, and for some reason decided to hang onto them, you wouldn't be able to convince me to give them to you unless you had a damn good reason. I certainly wouldn't casually hand them over and just say "hey, if you see weird sh*t and me bleeding out of my head, just keep it to yourself, ok?" One would imagine that Alex would have expected J to watch the videos fairly quickly (which he didn't do), or at least have considered that to be a possible event, which means Alex was unconcerned with J knowing what's on the tapes. Presumably because he (Alex) was expecting to be unavailable effective immediately (dead? gone forever? hiding?), or I suppose possibly because he had some other reason to just not give a damn anymore. But it's hard to imagine not caring about what's on those tapes.


It makes sense to me if he was keeping them to himself for the protection of everyone else. It's like the situation where someone is saying to you "Please show me what this 'goatse' thing is" and you keep saying "no, you really don't want to know". Most people, in that situation, will eventually crack and say "Ok, you brought it on yourself."

I don't know if you've been in that particular situation Sad

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:18 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
JiroKage
Greenhorn


Joined: 05 Oct 2009
Posts: 7

Considering the volume of tapes it was mentioned he had "filled up the back of his car" coupled with his frantic mental state, it's altogether possible he didn't remember anything "incriminating" on the tapes. Consider also, that if he did edit out pieces of the tapes himself, perhaps he considered himself protected already.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:06 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
fezzik
Veteran

Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 131

All of these are good thoughts and yes, the explanation might be some combination of these things. But think about it from Alex' perspective. He had to assume that J would watch the tapes, probably right away. J didn't do that, but Alex would've assumed he would at least watch parts of them. It's possible Alex didn't remember their entire contents, true. And before Entry #14 I might've believed that Alex might be casual about them. But in Entry 14 the man is bleeding profusely from his head. Me, I'd remember that. So assume J watches them (or parts of them) and sees that. Wouldn't he go back to Alex? That seems like it would be a really awkward conversation that undoubtedly Alex wouldn't want to have. Remember, J didn't find the tapes, or get them by mistake. Alex gave them to him on purpose (yes, after being coerced, but still). Alex seemed to want it to just all go away, and giving those tapes to J was not the way to make that happen. It was contrary to his goals. So, the only things that make sense to me are:

1) For some reason (amnesia? depression?) Alex forgot what was on the tapes, or just couldn't bring himself to care anymore. Seems kind of unlikely or at least out-of-character, but certainly possible, especially if we assume some sort of paranormal influence ("these are not the tapes you're looking for").

2) J had some way of talking him into it, some leverage, e.g. blackmail.

3) Alex wasn't planning on being around long enough to care; he knew he was disappearing immediately and didn't think he'd ever be found. This is honestly my favorite explanation.

4) J is flat out lying about the whole thing, or at least how he got the tapes.

[Of course there's still 5: it really doesn't make any sense and the PM just didn't think it through enough. I'm really hoping that's not it.]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:40 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Egevened
Guest


Just a note

J is human, therefore cannot be trusted

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:16 pm
 Back to top 
ASD1
Guest


Well, there were many tapes, and J didn't watch them right away, right? Alex could've already left by the time J found the tape that had him bleeding and in shock.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:47 pm
 Back to top 
TNC
Guest


Egevened wrote:
Just a note

J is human, therefore cannot be trusted


Just a note, totheark said no one can be trusted, either.

So, that really holds no ground any longer.



Anyways, another thing: Slender Man mythos state the controlling of victim's minds. Maybe Alex was still under SM's power at the time, and, whatever Alex was being used for was nearing an end. SM needed a new victim besides him, a new puppet. Maybe he was just having Alex play "hard to get" in order to interest J. I've done this to people before; Saying they don't want something in order to get them interested in it.

Maybe Alex and J aren't as good friends as he thinks, and Alex wanted to pass the curse on.

Maybe the curse can ONLY be passed on to a friend; Brian passed it to Alex, Alex passed it to J.

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:28 pm
 Back to top 
fezzik
Veteran

Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Posts: 131

@ASD1: Sure, could be, but I wouldn't think Alex would count on it. The more I think about it, the more I feel that Alex had reason to think J would never be able to get back to him about the tapes, and for that reason it didn't matter. Whether Alex just thought he would be moving away and couldn't be found, or had something more sinister/paranormal in mind I can't say. Or, of course, J is just lying.

[OOG]
I get a weird dichotomy feeling from MH. Some parts of it seem fairly amateurish; the dependence on YouTube, the kinda-makes-no-sense story, the fact that months in we really have no idea what the point is or what's going on, the nagging suspicion that there's no overall plan or game, just some odd videos. But then other things seem pretty well done; the movies are satisfyingly spooky and well put-together. Some serious planning had to go into this thing: locations scouted, costumes or digital effects, some non-trivial A/V editing, finding actors, and staying generally on top of things. Anyone who's tried to do this sort of thing can tell that the people making those videos know what they're doing. So I can't decide if MH is just going to fizzle out or whether it's actually so good that it's kind of laughing at us; e.g. whether it's just crazy or Crazy Like A Fox.
[/OOG]

PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:57 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Cineball
Decorated


Joined: 09 Apr 2008
Posts: 181
Location: SF

At this very early point in my involvement I like to believe the "J is lying" theory above any others.

This begs the question, what does he have to gain by putting the story out there? If he is lying there must be a reason and the only logical conclusion is that he was involved in the Marble Hornet/SM events in some way and is throwing us all off his trail. To play Devil's advocate myself for a while, here's what could have happened:

J knew his "friend" was making this film. J decided to screw with Alex's production either as a joke or to gain academic advantage. Remember that J claims he and Alex were both film students so there would be competition for scholarships and whatnot. So J drives Alex insane. Alex isn't sleeping well, he's always stressed, he is constantly recording himself. J succeeds in stopping Alex's effort and Alex never discovers that J was behind it all along, but he keeps the tapes for some reason. J finds out that Alex still has all these tapes and has to acquire them somehow in case there's any incriminating evidence that would be grounds for academic retribution, loss of funding, expulsion, etc. J convinces Alex to hand over the tapes and waits until Alex is long gone so that he's not likely to see that J is creating a new storyline out of the footage casting Alex in a different light and throwing the suspicion on others in on the production.

None of this explains who TTA is, and I'd rather SM simply be SM. But J should never be above reproach.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 8:22 am
 View user's profile AIM Address MSN Messenger
 Back to top 
Slender freak
Unfettered


Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Posts: 368

I believe that Marbel hornets is just a really good youtube movie, or if it can be proven---REAL!

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:40 am
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
dpt
Guest


Cineball wrote:
At this very early point in my involvement I like to believe the "J is lying" theory above any others.

This begs the question, what does he have to gain by putting the story out there? If he is lying there must be a reason and the only logical conclusion is that he was involved in the Marble Hornet/SM events in some way and is throwing us all off his trail. To play Devil's advocate myself for a while, here's what could have happened:

J knew his "friend" was making this film. J decided to screw with Alex's production either as a joke or to gain academic advantage. Remember that J claims he and Alex were both film students so there would be competition for scholarships and whatnot. So J drives Alex insane. Alex isn't sleeping well, he's always stressed, he is constantly recording himself. J succeeds in stopping Alex's effort and Alex never discovers that J was behind it all along, but he keeps the tapes for some reason. J finds out that Alex still has all these tapes and has to acquire them somehow in case there's any incriminating evidence that would be grounds for academic retribution, loss of funding, expulsion, etc. J convinces Alex to hand over the tapes and waits until Alex is long gone so that he's not likely to see that J is creating a new storyline out of the footage casting Alex in a different light and throwing the suspicion on others in on the production.

None of this explains who TTA is, and I'd rather SM simply be SM. But J should never be above reproach.


J is really being controlled by SM?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 11:38 am
 Back to top 
Future Sith
Veteran


Joined: 08 Oct 2009
Posts: 89

So do we think this theory is still good?

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:27 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
TheNightmareComplex
Entrenched


Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Posts: 989
Location: South Carolina

It's not the most impressive theory, but still a pretty good one.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:34 pm
 View user's profile
 Back to top 
Guest
Guest


TheNightmareComplex wrote:
It's not the most impressive theory, but still a pretty good one.


Not after entry 16 including visual tearing on J's camera it isn't.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:38 pm
 Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 3 of 4 [48 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Chaotic Fiction » Marble Hornets
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
You cannot post calendar events in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group