unforum

[Slender freak]

[Video]Slender Freak's response to Entry#25

[Ish]

Remember, just because Jay said that video was from totheark, it doesn't necessarily mean TTA is Masky.

Jay is human, therefore his observations can't be fully trusted. He jumps to conclusions and can be wrong, just like everyone else. That's what totheark meant at the very beginning.

Though Entry ##### is pretty damning, isn't it?

[Nimbus]

[Cardy]

[Spritey]

Stop trying to find Slenderman in the footage, you guys. This is obviously just recycled news footage; they don't have the resources to fake something like this.

[Seraphic Adonis]

[eggopm3]

Does anybody else think that the building in entry 25 is meant to be the same building that was featured in Program?

[Seraphic Adonis]

[Ish]

[Slender freak]

did anyone else notice this?

[Seraphic Adonis]

@Ish; to my knowledge, greenscreen is quite cheap these days (well, not to do it professionally and with high-quality, but), as I have seen a few vlogs from people who indicate themselves to be cheapskates that utilize it. All you really need is some white bedsheets to serve as the background, you film them doing their still actions and insert them into a good spot in pre-existing film. But there is no need for argument over this minor point.

I believe someone mentioned, earlier in the thread, that it's entirely possible that even if these news stories are real ones (which they are), but we are supposed to believe that these objects are Slendy/Masky/etc; regardless, it doesn't matter if Slendy/Masky is in this frame since the implication of their involvement is there.

@Slender freak; have you not read the thread? =/ That's been kicking around for nigh on sixteen pages now.

-edit-
Well, not the image itself. Just the idea that "Slendy is in that sequence of shots."

[Señor]

IIRC the part with telephone-pole-Slendy isn't part of the original newscast. Therefore they could've filmed that part themselves and edited it in.

[Fiasco]

[Fiasco]

[theonewhoquestions]

Jeez, I take a break for a week and get my hair cut and this happens?

I think it's less that the telephone pole/tree has hands, but that somebody standing behind it has their hands waving out from behind.

And yeah, while it is just unaltered recycled footage, adding hands waving from behind a tree MIGHT (I repeat, might) be within budget. It would be a fairly small, controllable detail and probably a great deal easier than a whole body.

I'm betting it's just found footage though. But that doesn't make it any less important in setting up future events or reinforcing past ones.

Also, that background noise is pretty creepy.